AnhL-504
ago 2025 se unió
Te damos la bienvenida a nuevo perfil
Nuestras actualizaciones aún están en desarrollo. Si bien la versión anterior de el perfil ya no está disponible, estamos trabajando activamente en mejoras, ¡y algunas de las funciones que faltan regresarán pronto! Mantente al tanto para su regreso. Mientras tanto, el análisis de calificaciones sigue disponible en nuestras aplicaciones para iOS y Android, en la página de perfil. Para ver la distribución de tus calificaciones por año y género, consulta nuestra nueva Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos2
Para saber cómo ganar distintivos, ve a página de ayuda de distintivos.
Calificaciones2
Clasificación de AnhL-504
Reseñas2
Clasificación de AnhL-504
In Trigger, episode 4 shows:
Most of the people who register to receive guns are victims of social injustice: being humiliated, cheated, exploited, despised, but have no legal tools or spiritual support to fight back.
They are forced into a situation where "they can only endure silently", meaning that society has abandoned them.
👉 At that moment, giving them a gun is like giving them "the last right to demand justice".
But the problem here is:
A gun is not just a real-life weapon, but a metaphor for "absolute power".
Once they use it to shoot their enemies, they immediately relieve injustice, but at the same time they also:
Become criminals immediately.
There is no turning back, because society will see them as murderers, not victims anymore.
The "liberation" by guns is actually a double-edged trap:
Helping them satisfy, but cutting off their future.
Giving them power, but taking away their lives.
I think the director intentionally pushes the audience into this contradiction:
On the one hand, the audience understands and sympathizes with them ("If I were you, I would probably want to shoot you").
But on the other hand, we also see that guns are not a truly fair solution, but only a way to "turn despair into destruction".
👉 In short:
The "ultimate weapon" in the film is a symbol of despair cloaked in power. It helps people take revenge, but at the same time kills both the victim and the perpetrator.
Most of the people who register to receive guns are victims of social injustice: being humiliated, cheated, exploited, despised, but have no legal tools or spiritual support to fight back.
They are forced into a situation where "they can only endure silently", meaning that society has abandoned them.
👉 At that moment, giving them a gun is like giving them "the last right to demand justice".
But the problem here is:
A gun is not just a real-life weapon, but a metaphor for "absolute power".
Once they use it to shoot their enemies, they immediately relieve injustice, but at the same time they also:
Become criminals immediately.
There is no turning back, because society will see them as murderers, not victims anymore.
The "liberation" by guns is actually a double-edged trap:
Helping them satisfy, but cutting off their future.
Giving them power, but taking away their lives.
I think the director intentionally pushes the audience into this contradiction:
On the one hand, the audience understands and sympathizes with them ("If I were you, I would probably want to shoot you").
But on the other hand, we also see that guns are not a truly fair solution, but only a way to "turn despair into destruction".
👉 In short:
The "ultimate weapon" in the film is a symbol of despair cloaked in power. It helps people take revenge, but at the same time kills both the victim and the perpetrator.