Lorsqu'un jeune ingénieur en systèmes dénonce une technologie dangereuse, Les Anges doivent agir, mettant leur vie en danger pour nous protéger tous.Lorsqu'un jeune ingénieur en systèmes dénonce une technologie dangereuse, Les Anges doivent agir, mettant leur vie en danger pour nous protéger tous.Lorsqu'un jeune ingénieur en systèmes dénonce une technologie dangereuse, Les Anges doivent agir, mettant leur vie en danger pour nous protéger tous.
- Réalisation
- Scénaristes
- Vedettes
- Prix
- 1 victoire et 9 nominations au total
Hannah Hoekstra
- Ingrid (Angel)
- (as Hanna Hoekstra)
5,084.1K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Avis en vedette
10scodivjr
Thumbs up!
While it isn't/wasn't a blockbuster movie, nor did it star huge Hollywood names I think it deserves a shot.
I found it to be a nice blend of comedy and action.
I found it to be a nice blend of comedy and action.
The critics are nuts
My husband and I just watched this and we thought it was great! It was funny and action packed. Highly recommended. People need to stop picking apart every little thing and just enjoy stuff.
10necsitm
Good Fun Movie
I really liked this movie and hate that I did not give it a chance. The previews when it first came out did not sell it good. But it is a continuation of the series and the two movies, and it is more advanced and with the times. I actually loved the cast. If you have not seen it, watch it it's a good fun time!!!!
People dont get it!!!
The kind of Angels films were never supposed to be serious, why most of people take it so serious to watch and bang them mercilessly afterwards is way over my head. It's a fun watch with all the silliness come with it, ain't it?
10capnsol
Tons of silly fun!
Tons of fun. Fits perfectly in the genre of silly action movie that doesn't try to be realistic or serious. Along the lines of The Fast and the Furious.
All of the main characters have a good dose of personality, and they're all fun to watch, and clearly having fun making it, Jane to a lesser extent, but she is playing the serious character, so not really her fault.
It's a pretty funny movie, mostly intentional, but there are also a few moments of unintentional humor that just add to the intentional humor. The setting montages are poorly edited, but this ends up adding to the goodness of the movie because they're so good-bad. The CGI is similar in this regard. There are a couple moments when it looks rather cheap. But as I said, it just adds on to the healthy dose of intentional humor.
Some people are saying this reboot was pointless or unnecessary, but I disagree. It's been a long time since the last Charlie's Angels. I watched it not long ago and it felt so dated it lost my attention. I'm not saying it's bad, but it's very much from a different era.
For the record, I would actually give this an 8/10, but since all the butthurt neck beards with fragile egos are giving this 1s and 2s, I'm trying to restore balance to the force.
All of the main characters have a good dose of personality, and they're all fun to watch, and clearly having fun making it, Jane to a lesser extent, but she is playing the serious character, so not really her fault.
It's a pretty funny movie, mostly intentional, but there are also a few moments of unintentional humor that just add to the intentional humor. The setting montages are poorly edited, but this ends up adding to the goodness of the movie because they're so good-bad. The CGI is similar in this regard. There are a couple moments when it looks rather cheap. But as I said, it just adds on to the healthy dose of intentional humor.
Some people are saying this reboot was pointless or unnecessary, but I disagree. It's been a long time since the last Charlie's Angels. I watched it not long ago and it felt so dated it lost my attention. I'm not saying it's bad, but it's very much from a different era.
For the record, I would actually give this an 8/10, but since all the butthurt neck beards with fragile egos are giving this 1s and 2s, I'm trying to restore balance to the force.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe movie features extensive use of guns and other explosive weaponry. This is a marked change from Charlie et ses drôles de dames (2000) and Charlie et ses drôles de dames se déchaînent (2003), in which star and executive producer Drew Barrymore insisted that the Angels use no guns at all and almost no weapons aside from their own martial arts skills.
- GaffesAfter Edgar's car sinks, Jane dives and struggles with the door in order to save Elena. However, since the rear window was totally broken during the car chase, Elena could simply swim through it.
- Citations
Jane Kano: I need you to exhibit some attention-seeking behavior.
Sabina Wilson: I have so many ideas.
- Générique farfeluDuring the end credits, there are several scenes showing Elena being trained to be an Angel. Famous athletes and models play the instructing Angels.
- ConnexionsFeatured in WatchMojo: Top 10 Upcoming Comedy Movies That Might Suck (2019)
- Bandes originalesPantera
Written by Elof Loelv, Andres Torres, Mauricio Rengifo, Alyssa Lourdiz Cantu, Anitta (as Larissa De Macedo Machado), Umberto Tavares and Pablo Christian Fuentes
Produced by Elof Loelv
Performed by Anitta
Anitta appears courtesy of Warner Music (Brasil), Ltd., a Warner Music Group Company
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Charlie's Angels?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Charlie's Angels
- Lieux de tournage
- Istanbul, Turquie(location)
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 48 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 17 803 077 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 8 351 109 $ US
- 17 nov. 2019
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 73 279 888 $ US
- Durée
- 1h 58m(118 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant






