Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA gothic tale of obsession between a haunted young woman and the terrifying vampire infatuated with her, causing untold horror in its wake.A gothic tale of obsession between a haunted young woman and the terrifying vampire infatuated with her, causing untold horror in its wake.A gothic tale of obsession between a haunted young woman and the terrifying vampire infatuated with her, causing untold horror in its wake.
- Réalisation
- Scénaristes
- Vedettes
- Nommé pour 4 oscars
- 60 victoires et 194 nominations au total
Gherghina Bereghianu
- Innkeeper's Mother-in-Law
- (as Georgina Bereghianu)
Katerina Bila
- Virgin on Horseback
- (as Kateřina Bílá)
7,1248.9K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Sommaire
Reviewers say 'Nosferatu' is lauded for its visuals, gothic atmosphere, and strong performances by Lily-Rose Depp and Bill Skarsgård. The film's meticulous detail and haunting score are appreciated, though some find the pacing slow and story unoriginal. Themes of isolation and obsession are well-explored, but narrative clarity is criticized. Practical effects enhance the immersive experience, yet the film's length is seen as tedious by some.
Avis en vedette
Meh....meh
This film did nothing that Coppola's 1992 Bram Stoker's Dracula didn't already do. Coppola's film both thematically, and visually broke ground (costumes, creature design, set pieces, etc.), and had a far more expository, but also sinister and apprehensive feel. Not to mention it was also far more carnal. Nosferatu on the other hand, just felt like a tamer, "nothing new to see here" re-make, with nothing remotely original in any depictions. Maybe if Nosferatu looked scarier than a bald Vlad Teppish ("The Impaler", "Dracul"), that might've helped. I give it a 5-6 with a "I wouldn't watch it again" rating.
A visual marvel with solid performances but a partly-enervated screenplay
Robert Eggers made a significant impression with his 2015 directorial debut "The Witch", and has continued to impress me since. A reimagining of "Nosferatu" at his helm seemed like a dream come true, and after many years, it finally came to fruition with somewhat mixed results.
As with the original 1922 film and Werner Herzog's surreal 1979 remake, Eggers mostly honors the source material here. The original film itself was a blatant derivative of "Dracula," so anyone who knows the bones of that classic story will more or less already have the lay of the land in terms of what happens in "Nosferatu".
Firstly, the attention to detail here is impeccable; the period costumes and sets are dazzling, and the cinematography is top-notch, with repeated uses of muted grey nighttime sequences that border on black-and-white (intentional I'm sure, as an ode to the Murnau original). In the latter act, as rats and plague take over the streets, there is a palpable sense of rot that is highly effective. Given that Eggers has proven his excellence in these departments with his previous films, it is no surprise that the finer details and visuals are uniformly stunning.
As far as performances are concerned, we have a strong cast here. Lily-Rose Depp (whom I'd never seen in anything prior to this) gave a formidable performance as the haunted Ellen Hutter, who is pursued by Count Orlok (Bill Skarsgard), a malevolent vampire whose connection to her is emboldened when her husband Thomas (Nicholas Hoult) is assigned to handle estate matters for the Count. Willem Dafoe is as spunky as ever here as an occult expert who attempts to help the Hutters, and Aaron Taylor-Johnson and Emma Corrin give effective performances as the Hardings, friends of the Hutters who oversee the troubled Ellen while Thomas travels to Orlok.
All of these aforementioned elements give the film a real leg up, and approximately the first half of it (largely consisting of Thomas's travels into Transylvania and first encounter with Orlok) are engrossing and beautifully contrasted with Ellen's "melancholic" (and eventually possession-like) episodes back in urban Germany. However, once the story returns its focus to the city, the film seems to stall its momentum. One of the notable differences in this reimagining is that the focus revolves more around the Ellen character (aptly named "Lucy Harker" in Herzog's version) and the Hardings, but the unfortunate thing is that it never feels like the audience gets to know them any better for it. This is especially so in the case of Ellen, whose character has a slightly different spin in Eggers's screenplay, specifically in terms of her relationship to Orlok. The result feels like something of a missed opportunity, and the proverbial stake is driven in even further when one considers the film's running time, which is considerably longer than both the 1922 and 1979 versions, and yet those films often feel more involved. There is a strange amorphousness about the 2024 version's latter half that left it feeling enervated, especially against the ominous and suspenseful first hour.
The film's conclusion will hold no surprises for those who already know the previous films, but Eggers's staging of it is nonetheless spectacular and visually effective--and this is a fact that remains true about the film as a whole. Unfortunately, it does stumble a bit in the latter half as it seems to attempt to expand the material without ever fully reaching a satisfactory fever pitch. All that being said, the film is a gothic visual marvel in its own right, upheld by stunning cinematography and uniformly solid performances. It is imperfect, but it is a showstopper in more ways than one. 7/10.
As with the original 1922 film and Werner Herzog's surreal 1979 remake, Eggers mostly honors the source material here. The original film itself was a blatant derivative of "Dracula," so anyone who knows the bones of that classic story will more or less already have the lay of the land in terms of what happens in "Nosferatu".
Firstly, the attention to detail here is impeccable; the period costumes and sets are dazzling, and the cinematography is top-notch, with repeated uses of muted grey nighttime sequences that border on black-and-white (intentional I'm sure, as an ode to the Murnau original). In the latter act, as rats and plague take over the streets, there is a palpable sense of rot that is highly effective. Given that Eggers has proven his excellence in these departments with his previous films, it is no surprise that the finer details and visuals are uniformly stunning.
As far as performances are concerned, we have a strong cast here. Lily-Rose Depp (whom I'd never seen in anything prior to this) gave a formidable performance as the haunted Ellen Hutter, who is pursued by Count Orlok (Bill Skarsgard), a malevolent vampire whose connection to her is emboldened when her husband Thomas (Nicholas Hoult) is assigned to handle estate matters for the Count. Willem Dafoe is as spunky as ever here as an occult expert who attempts to help the Hutters, and Aaron Taylor-Johnson and Emma Corrin give effective performances as the Hardings, friends of the Hutters who oversee the troubled Ellen while Thomas travels to Orlok.
All of these aforementioned elements give the film a real leg up, and approximately the first half of it (largely consisting of Thomas's travels into Transylvania and first encounter with Orlok) are engrossing and beautifully contrasted with Ellen's "melancholic" (and eventually possession-like) episodes back in urban Germany. However, once the story returns its focus to the city, the film seems to stall its momentum. One of the notable differences in this reimagining is that the focus revolves more around the Ellen character (aptly named "Lucy Harker" in Herzog's version) and the Hardings, but the unfortunate thing is that it never feels like the audience gets to know them any better for it. This is especially so in the case of Ellen, whose character has a slightly different spin in Eggers's screenplay, specifically in terms of her relationship to Orlok. The result feels like something of a missed opportunity, and the proverbial stake is driven in even further when one considers the film's running time, which is considerably longer than both the 1922 and 1979 versions, and yet those films often feel more involved. There is a strange amorphousness about the 2024 version's latter half that left it feeling enervated, especially against the ominous and suspenseful first hour.
The film's conclusion will hold no surprises for those who already know the previous films, but Eggers's staging of it is nonetheless spectacular and visually effective--and this is a fact that remains true about the film as a whole. Unfortunately, it does stumble a bit in the latter half as it seems to attempt to expand the material without ever fully reaching a satisfactory fever pitch. All that being said, the film is a gothic visual marvel in its own right, upheld by stunning cinematography and uniformly solid performances. It is imperfect, but it is a showstopper in more ways than one. 7/10.
No more than mediocre revisionism
F. W. Murnau's (illegally adapted) 1922 film Nosferatu presented the vampire as a sickly, batlike elf. In the new 'Nosferatu,' Robert Eggers introduces an off-putting new look for Count Orlok, but Nosferatu (2024) is an unnecessary retelling of Murnau's original film wrapped in mediocrity. It reflects a trend of nostalgia and reboots. Innovation takes a backseat to reverence in the foreground. This is an exercise in indulgence that only the MMXXV Generation will enjoy. Visually, the film is overblown in its impressionistic palette. Coppola's Dracula was visually more imposing, combining opulent gothic imagery with operatic intensity. Herzog's Nosferatu (1979) had more haunting, austere beauty. And Carl Dreyer's Vampyr (1932) was more dreamlike.
Did Not Do It For Me
I usually love Robert Eggers' work - his films have this unique ability to pull you into eerie, unsettling worlds that linger with you long after the movie has finished. But his take on Nosferatu just didn't land for me.
The pacing was painfully slow, to the point where it felt like it was dragging for the sake of atmosphere rather than tension. And while I can appreciate deliberate storytelling, this just felt uninspiring, like it was going through the motions without that signature spark Eggers usually brings to his projects.
To make matters worse, I couldn't stop seeing Dr. Robotnik from Sonic the Hedgehog every time Nosferatu was on screen. It's probably not fair to the film, but the resemblance was so distracting that I found myself more amused than unsettled.
Ultimately, Nosferatu lacked the sharp, visceral energy that made Eggers' previous work so compelling. Instead of feeling haunted, I left the theater feeling underwhelmed.
The pacing was painfully slow, to the point where it felt like it was dragging for the sake of atmosphere rather than tension. And while I can appreciate deliberate storytelling, this just felt uninspiring, like it was going through the motions without that signature spark Eggers usually brings to his projects.
To make matters worse, I couldn't stop seeing Dr. Robotnik from Sonic the Hedgehog every time Nosferatu was on screen. It's probably not fair to the film, but the resemblance was so distracting that I found myself more amused than unsettled.
Ultimately, Nosferatu lacked the sharp, visceral energy that made Eggers' previous work so compelling. Instead of feeling haunted, I left the theater feeling underwhelmed.
Good, but I prefer Herzog's version
It wouldn't make much sense to compare this efx heavy remake to the black and white original (an unauthorized rip-off of Dracula). But I couldn't help comparing this to Herzog's 1979 version and would recommend any fan of this movie who hasn't already seen that one to check it out. Here's why:
Unlike Lily Depp, Isabelle Adjani projected a vulnerability that made her sacrifice all the more brave.
Eggers' screenplay basically just dresses up the original with some long-winded dialog, particularly dragging the last half out to annoying lengths. His biggest changes were the addition of shock efx imagery inserted at critical moments to amp up the horror. For me, they had the opposite effect - distracting reminders that we were watching an "artsy" film.
The CGI enhancements add some stunning visuals in places, but by lessening the authenticity they lower the horror aspect. For example, in Herzog's version, seeing thousands of real rats flooding the dock (a marvel of animal wrangling) evokes the utter horror of the moment while the rats in the new version just look like background rats in a video game.
Eggers' biggest strength is his eye for detail. The costumes are gorgeous. The settings as well. The film comes alive when Hoult arrives in Eastern Europe. The gypsy and peasant scenes are the best in the movie.
Ralph Ineson is excellent. The rest of the cast is good. I found Depp too cold and unlikeable from the start. I gave up trying to catch all her whispery dialog, ditto for the garbled rumblings of Nosferatu in a few scenes.
This film will no doubt be more enjoyable to those who haven't previously seen Herzog's, as it will seem more original and the drawn-out scenes less laborious.
I should add I'm a huge fan of The Witch and I appreciated much that was good in this film. It just wasn't a grand slam for me.
Unlike Lily Depp, Isabelle Adjani projected a vulnerability that made her sacrifice all the more brave.
Eggers' screenplay basically just dresses up the original with some long-winded dialog, particularly dragging the last half out to annoying lengths. His biggest changes were the addition of shock efx imagery inserted at critical moments to amp up the horror. For me, they had the opposite effect - distracting reminders that we were watching an "artsy" film.
The CGI enhancements add some stunning visuals in places, but by lessening the authenticity they lower the horror aspect. For example, in Herzog's version, seeing thousands of real rats flooding the dock (a marvel of animal wrangling) evokes the utter horror of the moment while the rats in the new version just look like background rats in a video game.
Eggers' biggest strength is his eye for detail. The costumes are gorgeous. The settings as well. The film comes alive when Hoult arrives in Eastern Europe. The gypsy and peasant scenes are the best in the movie.
Ralph Ineson is excellent. The rest of the cast is good. I found Depp too cold and unlikeable from the start. I gave up trying to catch all her whispery dialog, ditto for the garbled rumblings of Nosferatu in a few scenes.
This film will no doubt be more enjoyable to those who haven't previously seen Herzog's, as it will seem more original and the drawn-out scenes less laborious.
I should add I'm a huge fan of The Witch and I appreciated much that was good in this film. It just wasn't a grand slam for me.
Stream & Scream: 13 Fresh Frights
Stream & Scream: 13 Fresh Frights
Our Sr. Video Producer Alex Logan is back with two handfuls of his top Halloween-season picks available on streaming. If you’re a freak like him, his recs from the past five or so years should keep you up all night.
Blocage sonore
Prévisualisez la bande originale ici et continuez à écouter sur Amazon Music.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe exteriors of Orlok's castle were filmed at Hunedoara Castle, also known as Corvin Castle, a Romanian castle located in Transylvania and one of the largest medieval castles extant in Europe.
- GaffesWhen Willem DaFoe sets fire to Knock's coffin, you can clearly see the gas jets igniting under the coffin.
- Citations
Ellen Hutter: Professor, my dreams grow darker. Does evil come from within us, or from beyond?
- Générique farfeluThe Universal Pictures, Focus Features, Maiden Voyage Pictures and Studio 8 production logos are 1920-styled versions, in homage to the era Nosferatu le vampire (1922) released.
- Autres versionsThe "Extended Cut" features four minutes of new footage, lengthening two scenes that were already included in the theatrical version. The first new scene is a Count Orlok monologue, responding to Thomas's mention of the ritual witnessed at a tavern during his journey, where the townspeople dug up a body from the forest and impaled it with a stake. The second scene shows more of the Second Night and foreshadows Ellen's eventual acceptance of agency over her own fate.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
Director Robert Eggers' Essential Watchlist
Director Robert Eggers' Essential Watchlist
Nosferatu director Robert Eggers recommends four of his all-time favorite films + one beloved TV series which he regularly returns to for inspiration and entertainment.
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Ma Cà Rồng Nosferatu
- Lieux de tournage
- Corvin Castle, Transylvania region, Roumanie(Castle shown in the trailer, 40-second mark)
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 50 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 95 608 235 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 21 652 560 $ US
- 29 déc. 2024
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 181 764 515 $ US
- Durée
- 2h 12m(132 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.66 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant






