Dix ans avant Kirk, Spock et l'Enterprise, l'USS Discovery découvre de nouveaux mondes et de nouvelles formes de vie alors qu'un officier de Starfleet apprend à comprendre toute chose étrang... Tout lireDix ans avant Kirk, Spock et l'Enterprise, l'USS Discovery découvre de nouveaux mondes et de nouvelles formes de vie alors qu'un officier de Starfleet apprend à comprendre toute chose étrangère.Dix ans avant Kirk, Spock et l'Enterprise, l'USS Discovery découvre de nouveaux mondes et de nouvelles formes de vie alors qu'un officier de Starfleet apprend à comprendre toute chose étrangère.
- A remporté 2 prix Primetime Emmy
- 23 victoires et 92 nominations au total
Parcourir les épisodes
Sommaire
Reviewers say 'Star Trek: Discovery' receives mixed reactions for its fresh take, impressive effects, and diverse cast. Fans appreciate modern themes and character development. Criticisms include Klingon redesigns, deviations from traditional values, and reliance on action over philosophical depth. Some find character arcs and storytelling lacking, while others praise progressive social justice themes. The series polarizes audiences with its approach to core Star Trek elements and new directions.
Avis en vedette
Where to begin...
For starters, it claims to be in line with the original series and its timeline yet nothing on display lines up with it or even visually resembles it. Instead it tries to replicate the look, feel, and energy of the JJ Abrams/Kelvin timeline movies(lens flares aplenty!) but it even fails at that.
The characters are mostly bland, stereotypical, and unlikeable.
It feels like everything that the original series tried to say has been thrown out the window to appeal to one-sided politics, Gene Roddenberry was trying to present hope and optimism for the future but here as far as Discovery is concerned the future is to be pretty but cold and uncaring.
As for the acting it ranges from good to okay mostly, very talented performers such as Jason Isaacs, Michelle Yeoh, Anson Mount, and Doug Jones all try their hardest but only in tiny glimpses are able to make the rough material work.
I would have to agree with other commenters that you are just better off with The Orville instead, far better Star Trek series.
For starters, it claims to be in line with the original series and its timeline yet nothing on display lines up with it or even visually resembles it. Instead it tries to replicate the look, feel, and energy of the JJ Abrams/Kelvin timeline movies(lens flares aplenty!) but it even fails at that.
The characters are mostly bland, stereotypical, and unlikeable.
It feels like everything that the original series tried to say has been thrown out the window to appeal to one-sided politics, Gene Roddenberry was trying to present hope and optimism for the future but here as far as Discovery is concerned the future is to be pretty but cold and uncaring.
As for the acting it ranges from good to okay mostly, very talented performers such as Jason Isaacs, Michelle Yeoh, Anson Mount, and Doug Jones all try their hardest but only in tiny glimpses are able to make the rough material work.
I would have to agree with other commenters that you are just better off with The Orville instead, far better Star Trek series.
The first season was ok and had a promising start but it rapidly decayed into a sappy soap opera set in the Star Trek universe. The characters in the show and the plot have all the potential needed but the continuing agony of ongoing psychology sessions (they call them episodes) is making me reconsider my future and I'll need counselling, long into the future, for having watched this. Writing this is part of my exposure therapy after season 4 where my brain was set to stun. But seriously, so disappointed that the focus was on giving out life lessons and not writing good Star Trek stories. I get it that you can have positive messages in shows, not a bad thing, but this is just way too much, at the expense of a potentially good series.
In my personal unscientific rating scale 4=Forced myself to watch to the end but didn't really enjoy and won't watch it again.
In my personal unscientific rating scale 4=Forced myself to watch to the end but didn't really enjoy and won't watch it again.
Watching season 4 up to episode 4 at the moment i can't shake the feeling overly sensitive person or people are responsible for directing and producing this soap opera-like show. There is so much drama that it feels there is only drama. No dark and light areas, no contrast just heavy drama situations, overly acted, overly wise conversations. I don't want to point fingers at the actors but some of them make my stomach turn how absolutely terrible they are at conveying emotion on screen.
I love star trek but this is the most boring series I've ever seen.
I love star trek but this is the most boring series I've ever seen.
I just finished watching season 4 episode 1 and I don't know what to make of it. The show's script and dialogues feels like it's for an audience of 12 years old. The special effects are nicely done but the technology is borderline "magic" not believable.
First 2 seasons I thoroughly enjoyed. (Through all seasons the constant, intense, whispered dialogue drives me nuts.)
Now everyone on the ship needing to be acknowledged for their feelings and overly emotional sense of being completely overshadows any mission.
This should be called Star Trek: Self Discovery because it's more like an aggressive HR sensitivity training seminar than anything Star Trek.
If Star Trek is what you're looking for, this isn't it. If you want a sci-fi, poorly written soap opera, this is your jam.
There's about 15-20 minutes of each episode worth watching if you're interested their actual mission. Skip skip skip
This review now contains 600+ characters.
Now everyone on the ship needing to be acknowledged for their feelings and overly emotional sense of being completely overshadows any mission.
This should be called Star Trek: Self Discovery because it's more like an aggressive HR sensitivity training seminar than anything Star Trek.
If Star Trek is what you're looking for, this isn't it. If you want a sci-fi, poorly written soap opera, this is your jam.
There's about 15-20 minutes of each episode worth watching if you're interested their actual mission. Skip skip skip
This review now contains 600+ characters.
Stellar Photos From the "Star Trek" TV Universe
Stellar Photos From the "Star Trek" TV Universe
We've rounded up some of our favorite photos from across the "Star Trek" TV universe. Take a look at memorable moments from red carpet premieres and classic episodes.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe Starfleet vessels seen in the first season, including the Discovery, the Shenzou and the redesigned Enterprise, were all designed by production artist John Eaves. Eaves' work with Star Trek spans three decades. Probably his most notable contribution was the design of the Enterprise-E for Star trek: Premier contact (1996).
- GaffesWith Michael being the adoptive sister of Spock, the series has many flashbacks to their childhood and upbringing on Vulcan. Spock's Vulcan half-brother, Sybok, does not appear nor is mention during these scenes. In Star Trek 5: L'ultime frontière (1989), Spock says that he and Sybok grew up together. However, since it's never stated when Sybok joined Sarek's home - only that he did so following his mother's death - or when he was exiled from the family, it's not impossible Sybok moved in after Burnham, and left before she graduated (the two extremes of the flashbacks). Also, since Sybok was never mentioned before Star Trek V, it seems reasonable the family never spoke of him again after his estrangement.
- Autres versionsThe serif-font legends and subtitles in the "broadcast" episodes are absent from the DVD versions, where they are replaced with the standard DVD subtitles.
- ConnexionsFeatured in MsMojo: Top 10 Female Lead TV Shows You Should Be Watching in 2017 (2017)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How many seasons does Star Trek: Discovery have?Propulsé par Alexa
- Why do the Klingons in this series look completely different to how they look in all of the previous Star Trek shows and films?
- Do I need to have seen any previous Star Trek TV series and movies in order to be able to understand and follow this show?
- Does this series take place in the alternate timeline of Star Trek (2009), or the timeline we are all used to from TOS?
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Star Trek: Hành Trình Khám Phá
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée1 heure
- Couleur
- Mixage
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant