ÉVALUATION IMDb
5,6/10
26 k
MA NOTE
Halloween prend vie dans une aventure comique inspirée des 400 millions de livres vendus par R.L. Stine.Halloween prend vie dans une aventure comique inspirée des 400 millions de livres vendus par R.L. Stine.Halloween prend vie dans une aventure comique inspirée des 400 millions de livres vendus par R.L. Stine.
- Réalisation
- Scénaristes
- Vedettes
Matthew J. Vasquez
- Derek
- (as Matthew Jose Vasquez)
Courtney Lauren Cummings
- Tyler's Crew
- (as Courtney Cummings)
5,625.9K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Avis en vedette
Amusing
In the second Goosebumps Cinematic Universe, some kids (of course) have some issues. There's Madison Iseman, who's terrified she's not going to be able to finish her essay on fear and get into an Ivy League University; there's her kid brother and his best friend, who are bullied in school. The boys run a business carting away old junk for free, figuring they'll find some stuff worth reselling in the trash. When they're called on to empty the attic of an abandoned house, they do: Slappy the demonic ventriloquist's dummy. He proceeds to turn half the town into monsters.
Like the earlier movie, Jack Black plays R.L. Stine in the second half of the movie -- the real author gets a cameo near the end. It's juvenile, of course, and rather silly, but there are some of the anxieties that kids really experience, and the humor is deliberate and the special effects good.
Like the earlier movie, Jack Black plays R.L. Stine in the second half of the movie -- the real author gets a cameo near the end. It's juvenile, of course, and rather silly, but there are some of the anxieties that kids really experience, and the humor is deliberate and the special effects good.
Part two is more for kids. Little kids.
The first goosebumps movie that came out in 2015 was fun, dark, and deffently for all audiences. This one felt like a rip off from modern movie IT, or stranger things. The actors at times got on my nerves and frankly Slappy as the main bad guy felt boring and I feel he is being over used. Also all of the monsters being out at the same time felt like a repetition of part 1 except the cast was younger and more annoying.
1. Would I see it again? Yea
2. Was it worth buying a ticket? No
3. Was the acting good? No
4. Was the music good? No
5. Costumes and fx good? Yes
6. Would I see it with a friend? Yes
7. Will I buy it on disc? No
8. Should you wait for it on DVD? Yes
9. Did i have fun? Yes
10. Is it a good movie? Yea...ish.
Watching this after the first movie just made it worse
Stand alone, this could make up as a pretty good children's halloween movie, it even has some morals kids would normally get in a kid's movie.
BUT
The first Goosebumps movie was enjoyable for almost all audiences despite some jokes being to childish and I expected so much
I think the actors did a good job but the characters that they had to give life to were just poorly imagined and too flat.
Also, Jack Black's appearance although we would have wanted more was clearly unnecessary and was treated as a narration or explanation if you haven't watched the first movie. It would have been better without him if they were just going to let him do that.
I think the actors did a good job but the characters that they had to give life to were just poorly imagined and too flat.
Also, Jack Black's appearance although we would have wanted more was clearly unnecessary and was treated as a narration or explanation if you haven't watched the first movie. It would have been better without him if they were just going to let him do that.
Its passable for very young kids but nowhere close to its predecessor.
I revisited this yesterday with my nephew n daughter.
This one is a stand alone sequel n apart from Jack Black in a tiny role, none of the cast from the previous film returns here.
This time two young boys gets hold of an unpublished n unfinished Goosebumps book titled Haunted Halloween. How the book is kept in the dilapidated n abandoned house is never explained. They also find Slappy n brings it to life by speaking magic words found in the dummy's pocket. So a lil confusion here. Slappy is found aft opening the book but he comes alive aft the magic words. Also Slappy brings all the Halloween monsters to life including the Werewolf n Snowman, albeit in a tiny role n that too without opening any book.
This time two young boys gets hold of an unpublished n unfinished Goosebumps book titled Haunted Halloween. How the book is kept in the dilapidated n abandoned house is never explained. They also find Slappy n brings it to life by speaking magic words found in the dummy's pocket. So a lil confusion here. Slappy is found aft opening the book but he comes alive aft the magic words. Also Slappy brings all the Halloween monsters to life including the Werewolf n Snowman, albeit in a tiny role n that too without opening any book.
Almost the same as the 2015 "Goosebumps" movie...
I decided to watch "Goosebumps 2: Haunted Halloween" because I did actually thoroughly enjoy the previous "Goosebumps" movie from 2015. And based on that movie, then I actually had high hopes for "Goosebumps 2: Haunted Halloween".
While "Goosebumps 2: Haunted Halloween" definitely was a visually pleasing movie, then it was just a very unnecessary sequel. Why? Well, because it was essentially the exact same as the 2015 movie, just changed the scenery, the monsters, and the characters. But the essence of the storyline and the outcome was the exact same thing. So that felt very anti-climatic and very much like a slap to the face with a cold, dead fish.
If you haven't already seen the 2015 "Goosebumps" movie then this sequel will be a good movie to watch. However, if you already did see the 2015 one, then there virtually is no need to watch "Goosebumps 2: Haunted Halloween". I am not kidding.
The CGI department definitely did not fail to deliver, because the CGI in the movie were quite good, just as they were in the previous movie. And that is actually the selling point to "Goosebumps 2: Haunted Halloween", sad to say.
This is very much a sequel in the very definition of a sequel. So it was soup being boiled on watered down broth.
While "Goosebumps 2: Haunted Halloween" definitely was a visually pleasing movie, then it was just a very unnecessary sequel. Why? Well, because it was essentially the exact same as the 2015 movie, just changed the scenery, the monsters, and the characters. But the essence of the storyline and the outcome was the exact same thing. So that felt very anti-climatic and very much like a slap to the face with a cold, dead fish.
If you haven't already seen the 2015 "Goosebumps" movie then this sequel will be a good movie to watch. However, if you already did see the 2015 one, then there virtually is no need to watch "Goosebumps 2: Haunted Halloween". I am not kidding.
The CGI department definitely did not fail to deliver, because the CGI in the movie were quite good, just as they were in the previous movie. And that is actually the selling point to "Goosebumps 2: Haunted Halloween", sad to say.
This is very much a sequel in the very definition of a sequel. So it was soup being boiled on watered down broth.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesR.L. Stine: as the presenter of the Science Award at the end of the film.
- GaffesWhen the 3 boys are knocked off their bikes by the hosepipe the bikes disappear immediately afterwards.
- Générique farfeluAt the end of the closing credits, Slappy is heard saying" Slappy Halloween" and chuckles.
- Autres versionsThe home video and digital releases only show the movie's title as simply "Goosebumps 2".
- ConnexionsFeatured in Top 5 Best/Worst: Top 5 Best Goosebumps Monsters (2018)
- Bandes originalesHow Bad We Need Each Other
Written and Performed by Marc Scibilia
Courtesy of Good Lander Records
Under license from Sony/ATV Music Publishing
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Goosebumps 2: Haunted Halloween?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Goosebumps 2: Haunted Halloween
- Lieux de tournage
- Kirkwood, Géorgie, États-Unis(Trick-or-treating scenes)
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 35 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 46 700 633 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 15 802 225 $ US
- 14 oct. 2018
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 93 320 380 $ US
- Durée
- 1h 30m(90 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant






