Julian Reed et Barbara Sullivan créent un bébé en utilisant l'ancien ADN d'un corps de Néandertal. William doit apprendre à exister dans un monde où il est le seul homme de Néandertal de la ... Tout lireJulian Reed et Barbara Sullivan créent un bébé en utilisant l'ancien ADN d'un corps de Néandertal. William doit apprendre à exister dans un monde où il est le seul homme de Néandertal de la planète.Julian Reed et Barbara Sullivan créent un bébé en utilisant l'ancien ADN d'un corps de Néandertal. William doit apprendre à exister dans un monde où il est le seul homme de Néandertal de la planète.
- Réalisation
- Scénaristes
- Vedettes
- Prix
- 3 victoires et 3 nominations au total
5,6706
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Avis en vedette
A fascinating film...
A fascinating film. It does leave you with a new perspective of "what if". It seems that most were confused or let down by the ending, however, I empathise and sympathise with William. Being the odd one or being forced into places that aren't meant for you can be rather distressing. The ending was a fine touch on how he was feeling inside.
Overall, great film. It surely does leave a lot of questions and an opening for a possible sequel.
Overall, great film. It surely does leave a lot of questions and an opening for a possible sequel.
It gets one thing right
I generally agree with the other reviewers, there's so much wrong with this movie, however they got one aspect right, for me anyway. I'm Aspergic, and like Neanderthals my brain is wired differently from neuro-typical humans. I experience the world in a different way. The portrayal of William, his interactions with other people, the way he struggles with things thing, and is an outsider trapped in a world where he doesn't belong, it all really hit home. This picture is almost a study in autism by proxy.
Could have so much better
Interesting film but there could have been so much more made with this film. Just didn't feel right. He's too normal and normal looking and they didn't explore the differences enough. It's an ok watch.
Inaccurate in many ways but could have been interesting film if it had not devolved into melodrama tropes
The initial premise isn't too bad. There are some problems. For example when the science on recovering and using A(ancient)-DNA gets better, you aren't going to see these types of experiments in North America, or Europe as in both surveys show a very large amount of resistance. But rather in east Asia where the surveys show a lot more borad public acceptance of human DNA experimentation.
There is also an issue with the way the Neanderthal's boy's intelligence is dealt with. We know that on broad averages individuals and population groups with more Neanderthal DNA input have better spacial intelligence and comprehension of metaphor and symbol -- not less. In that sense this film inverts the science. Neaderthal most likely extinction was caused by competition and with Homo Sapiens with Homo Sapiens key advantages being in long, medium and short burst running speed and a couple of other attributes, including greater sexual dimporphism, that led to better specialization.
but those are not the main problems with this film. The main problem is shoehorning an interesting science fiction piece with a tired melodrama of a kid being different, wishing they were not, and then acceptance. it makes this film a hallmark card/lifetime channel trope that isn't even above average in that field.
There is also an issue with the way the Neanderthal's boy's intelligence is dealt with. We know that on broad averages individuals and population groups with more Neanderthal DNA input have better spacial intelligence and comprehension of metaphor and symbol -- not less. In that sense this film inverts the science. Neaderthal most likely extinction was caused by competition and with Homo Sapiens with Homo Sapiens key advantages being in long, medium and short burst running speed and a couple of other attributes, including greater sexual dimporphism, that led to better specialization.
but those are not the main problems with this film. The main problem is shoehorning an interesting science fiction piece with a tired melodrama of a kid being different, wishing they were not, and then acceptance. it makes this film a hallmark card/lifetime channel trope that isn't even above average in that field.
Did they run out of money?
Very short review here. This story was building up to have some kind of an amazing conclusion and then it's like the writer just ran out of money or time and was told that the story needs to end by noon today, so it was rushed. Very big let down for having invested my time.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe film explores themes of ethics, human nature, the definition of humanity, and the impact of scientific advancements.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is William?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Durée
- 1h 40m(100 min)
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant




