Un acteur de télé et sa doublure se lancent dans une odyssée pour se faire un nom dans l'industrie cinématographique lors des meurtres de Charles Manson en 1969 à Los Angeles.Un acteur de télé et sa doublure se lancent dans une odyssée pour se faire un nom dans l'industrie cinématographique lors des meurtres de Charles Manson en 1969 à Los Angeles.Un acteur de télé et sa doublure se lancent dans une odyssée pour se faire un nom dans l'industrie cinématographique lors des meurtres de Charles Manson en 1969 à Los Angeles.
- Réalisation
- Scénariste
- Vedettes
- A remporté 2 oscars
- 146 victoires et 377 nominations au total
7,6939.1K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Sommaire
Reviewers say 'Once Upon a Time in Hollywood' is a nostalgic, character-driven film focusing on 1960s Hollywood. It is praised for DiCaprio and Pitt's performances, meticulous era recreation, and cinematography. However, it is criticized for pacing, lack of a cohesive plot, and long scenes. The ending receives mixed reactions, celebrated for its surprise yet criticized for feeling out of place.
Avis en vedette
For a Tarantino flick disappointing to be sure
I'm a huge T fan, absolutely love many of his movies, but not all and sadly this joins the later list. The best way to describe this movie is "A day in the life of a Hollywood Actor in 1969". That is, mostly just an AVERAGE day, which is largely where the problem lies for many of us who expected more here.
Acting is great all around and saves it somewhat but like too often these days I really feel the script was weak. An example of this would be just how often we see Brad Pitt driving around by himself, where really nothing happens; it reeks of filler material but why even have it there in an already long film? Margo Robbie kind of got robbed here to some degree, her character just gets a very very minor role, didn't come off right at all.
A day in the life of in 1969 is somewhat interesting to many but if that is going to be the core it really needed some more Ooommph; like the Bruce Lee scene, German meeting scene and sequences like the ending, which finally had his trademarks all over it. Even though the film does have a "climax", there was really almost no lead up to it, and almost no really story tension throughout, sadly it mostly just plods along.
Really hoping for a return to form for his 10th and apparently possible last film. This film has some charm, which mostly comes through in the great acting, but overall this was disappointing.
Acting is great all around and saves it somewhat but like too often these days I really feel the script was weak. An example of this would be just how often we see Brad Pitt driving around by himself, where really nothing happens; it reeks of filler material but why even have it there in an already long film? Margo Robbie kind of got robbed here to some degree, her character just gets a very very minor role, didn't come off right at all.
A day in the life of in 1969 is somewhat interesting to many but if that is going to be the core it really needed some more Ooommph; like the Bruce Lee scene, German meeting scene and sequences like the ending, which finally had his trademarks all over it. Even though the film does have a "climax", there was really almost no lead up to it, and almost no really story tension throughout, sadly it mostly just plods along.
Really hoping for a return to form for his 10th and apparently possible last film. This film has some charm, which mostly comes through in the great acting, but overall this was disappointing.
Tarantino just created a new genre of film
I don't typically leave IMDb reviews but this film deserves so much praise for its risky screenplay in such a dark true crime setting.
For 2 hrs, 41 minutes, I was taken 50 years back, experiencing Hollywood's film industry as a comedic drama filled with desire, tension and everyday life.
I liked Brad's character the most, but Leo easily matched with his own performance. A definite see-it-in-theatres watch. Bring your sense of humor though. There are lines of dialogue and laugh out loud bits that completely satisfy your curious mind. Expect everything you would from Tarantino, but also what you wouldn't.
I gave it a perfect 10 because I forgot I was watching a nearly 3 hour film, even though it still wasn't long enough for me. I would like to see a director's cut up to an hour longer as I think this is a unique case that extra footage would only help such an already powerful story.
I had the privilege to watch an early 70mm screening of this film at the cinerama dome with the director, Tarantino, in the audience. It was a surreal experience I'll never forget.
For 2 hrs, 41 minutes, I was taken 50 years back, experiencing Hollywood's film industry as a comedic drama filled with desire, tension and everyday life.
I liked Brad's character the most, but Leo easily matched with his own performance. A definite see-it-in-theatres watch. Bring your sense of humor though. There are lines of dialogue and laugh out loud bits that completely satisfy your curious mind. Expect everything you would from Tarantino, but also what you wouldn't.
I gave it a perfect 10 because I forgot I was watching a nearly 3 hour film, even though it still wasn't long enough for me. I would like to see a director's cut up to an hour longer as I think this is a unique case that extra footage would only help such an already powerful story.
I had the privilege to watch an early 70mm screening of this film at the cinerama dome with the director, Tarantino, in the audience. It was a surreal experience I'll never forget.
This film will certainly divide audiences
Another great Tarantino film, though I do agree there are times where it feels a little indulgent and meandering. The climax of the film is fantastic though, and it does make it feel like it was all worth it for the most part. There isn't really a defined narrative, which may put some people off but Tarantino's sublime dialogue and the great performances make all of the scenes at least entertaining. It's no Pulp Fiction, but it definitely is one of the most original films I've seen in a while.
A love letter to a film industry that is no longer recognisable.
It took Quentin Tarantino a lifetime of living, 5 years to write and a 2 hours 41 minutes watch. This is a love letter to a film industry that is no longer recognisable. Hippies, short skirts, westerns..... all have disappeared from our movie world. But worry not, Quentin Tarantino is here to remind us of old school film making from a once beloved industry which has been described as being on life support.
The performances are flawless. I was apprehensive about how the events of August 8, 1969 would be handled. But that is handled tastefully and respectfully, yet with the classic Tarantino flair.
Will be quite a bit for those under 40 who have no recollection of this Hollywood. Some will categorise this as an over indulgent nostalgia trip for movie geeks. And they are likely to be correct. But for those of us who complain that Hollywood is reduced to remakes and comic book films, QT delivers a unique and creative viewing experience.
The performances are flawless. I was apprehensive about how the events of August 8, 1969 would be handled. But that is handled tastefully and respectfully, yet with the classic Tarantino flair.
Will be quite a bit for those under 40 who have no recollection of this Hollywood. Some will categorise this as an over indulgent nostalgia trip for movie geeks. And they are likely to be correct. But for those of us who complain that Hollywood is reduced to remakes and comic book films, QT delivers a unique and creative viewing experience.
The Manson story in a parallel universe.
I loved both the acting and the story. Brad Pitt shows a maturity playing "The old guy", and DiCaprio is spot on as the self absorbed, insecure fading star. The ending is classic Tarentino with a twist that caught me totally by surprise. I will watch this movie again. Loved it!
Explaining the Real Sharon Tate’s 'Hollywood' Appearance
Explaining the Real Sharon Tate’s 'Hollywood' Appearance
Quentin Tarantino and Margot Robbie reveal why footage of tragic actress Sharon Tate was included in Once Upon a Time in Hollywood.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesDonald "Shorty" Shea was a ranch hand employed by George Spahn. He had tried to warn Spahn about the dangerous nature of the Manson family. At some point he was jumped and then killed, with various body parts being buried around the ranch. One of the killers was Steve "Clem" Grogan - the hippie who knifes the tire and is confronted by Cliff. As he starts to change the tire you can see a cowboy in a corral in the background. As Shorty was the only ranch hand, this would have been him in the shot. His body was not found until 1977 when Clem agreed to show the police where the remains could be found.
- GaffesWhen Sharon Tate was talking to the girl at the box office of the movie theater in Westwood, you can see the Starbucks sign for half the scene before it was covered up. Starbucks was founded in 1971.
- Citations
Jay Sebring: Is everybody okay?
Rick Dalton: Well... the fuckin' hippies aren't. That's for goddamn sure.
- Générique farfeluLike Django déchaîné (2012), the film opens with the late 1960's Columbia Pictures logo.
- Autres versionsIn the teaser trailer and the next 2 theatrical trailers some shots from deleted scenes are shown.
- Cliff Booth see Charles Manson walking away from Sharon Tate's house. Both exchange looks. Charlie initially greets Cliff, later Charlie grunts at him.
- Sharon Tate dancing in a black dress in a moving stage.
- Mr. Schwarz salutes the projectionist before entering the projection room.
- Sharon Tate swimming in her pool.
- ConnexionsEdited from La grande évasion (1963)
- Bandes originalesThe Rocks
(from Have Gun - Will Travel (1957))
Written by Bernard Herrmann
Under license from Sony/ATV Music Publishing
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Once Upon a Time in... Hollywood
- Lieux de tournage
- Cielo Drive & Bella Drive, Los Angeles, Californie, États-Unis(the bottom of Rick's street begins here)
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 90 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 142 502 728 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 41 082 018 $ US
- 28 juill. 2019
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 392 105 159 $ US
- Durée
- 2h 41m(161 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant





