Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueTeenage secret agents must travel to the past and stop an evil doctor from creating a virus that wipes out all life in the future.Teenage secret agents must travel to the past and stop an evil doctor from creating a virus that wipes out all life in the future.Teenage secret agents must travel to the past and stop an evil doctor from creating a virus that wipes out all life in the future.
Ben Vazquez
- Jayden Hill
- (as Ben Edwards)
Avis en vedette
The First Cargo Boy and Pocket Man is a masterfully crafted story that seamlessly weaves sharp political commentary into its engaging narrative. On the surface, it's a quirky, fast-paced adventure filled with memorable characters-Cargo Boy's relentless hustle and Pocket Man's enigmatic presence make for an unforgettable duo. But beneath the humour and action lies a razor-sharp critique of capitalism, labour exploitation, and bureaucratic absurdity.
The way the film uses its absurd premise to highlight real-world issues is nothing short of genius. Cargo Boy's endless toil mirrors the struggles of the working class, while Pocket Man's mysterious influence feels like a biting satire on shadowy power brokers pulling strings behind the scenes.
The way the film uses its absurd premise to highlight real-world issues is nothing short of genius. Cargo Boy's endless toil mirrors the struggles of the working class, while Pocket Man's mysterious influence feels like a biting satire on shadowy power brokers pulling strings behind the scenes.
As soon as I read Teenage Secret Agents I knew this film would be total garbage. Teenagers are usually spotty little oinks who can't get out of bed or a safespace not secret agents saving the world. As a kids film I'm sure it will be loved but if you're a grown up don't waste your time or money with this one...
I only watched this because a flat headed reviewer decided that they were going to hate it as soon as they heard ' Teenage Secret Agents '.....!
No point in deciding against a visual experience based on 3 written words, you may as well make the choice not to watch it.
As it goes, not a bad movie at all! Good for a fun watch when there is nothing else.
If you are a young teen, you will enjoy it, If you are an adult you will accept it for what it is.
No point in deciding against a visual experience based on 3 written words, you may as well make the choice not to watch it.
As it goes, not a bad movie at all! Good for a fun watch when there is nothing else.
If you are a young teen, you will enjoy it, If you are an adult you will accept it for what it is.
We all know this was gonna be be bad. The trailer, the poster...heck the tagline alone caused someone to rage review this film (though I doubt they watched the movie). However, when you live in a state where the film commission has been gutted and you are left to your own laurels, what do you expect?
This ain't Rio Bravo or Evolution or Planet of the Apes. This is not the high quality films that used to come to the great state of Arizona before the conservative elite pretty much yeeted out the film commission and its associated offices (did I use yeet right?). So what is left is the DIY crowd, and I honestly can't get too angry at Clay Moffatt for making his own movies even if the quality is suspect. I guess when you have that kind of money to throw around, you might as well. But on the other hand, the modern era of DIY bad film making is its own niche, and this movie is on par with the likes of Birdemic. This movie was made with love and care, regardless of the awful production value.
It's hard to tell you what this story is. I mean, a story about an agency brainwashing...err....training young spies is an interesting idea. We have seen it many times before, but not at this level of low budget incompetence. The only thing that saves this thing is the eccentricity of it. It tries to be Dr. Who and any number of Christopher Nolan films with the budget barely big enough to pay for a wedding (which one reviewer called Good Bad or Bad Bad insinuated). Plus you got Ben Vasquez's ridiculous hat, the silly code names and the fact this secret organization would exist in the boring and ridiculously hot plains of Mesa, Arizona (I guess they could not afford Sedona or Flagstaff locations).
This movie is bad, let's be honest. But at least they tried (?).
This ain't Rio Bravo or Evolution or Planet of the Apes. This is not the high quality films that used to come to the great state of Arizona before the conservative elite pretty much yeeted out the film commission and its associated offices (did I use yeet right?). So what is left is the DIY crowd, and I honestly can't get too angry at Clay Moffatt for making his own movies even if the quality is suspect. I guess when you have that kind of money to throw around, you might as well. But on the other hand, the modern era of DIY bad film making is its own niche, and this movie is on par with the likes of Birdemic. This movie was made with love and care, regardless of the awful production value.
It's hard to tell you what this story is. I mean, a story about an agency brainwashing...err....training young spies is an interesting idea. We have seen it many times before, but not at this level of low budget incompetence. The only thing that saves this thing is the eccentricity of it. It tries to be Dr. Who and any number of Christopher Nolan films with the budget barely big enough to pay for a wedding (which one reviewer called Good Bad or Bad Bad insinuated). Plus you got Ben Vasquez's ridiculous hat, the silly code names and the fact this secret organization would exist in the boring and ridiculously hot plains of Mesa, Arizona (I guess they could not afford Sedona or Flagstaff locations).
This movie is bad, let's be honest. But at least they tried (?).
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe first of a planned trilogy.
- ConnexionsFollowed by The Rise of Sir Longbottom (2021)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 21 000 $ US (estimation)
- Durée1 heure 27 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant