L'agent spécial Orson Fortune et son équipe recrutent l'une des plus grandes stars de cinéma pour les aider dans une mission d'infiltration lorsque la vente d'une nouvelle technologie d'arme... Tout lireL'agent spécial Orson Fortune et son équipe recrutent l'une des plus grandes stars de cinéma pour les aider dans une mission d'infiltration lorsque la vente d'une nouvelle technologie d'armes mortelle menace de perturber l'ordre mondial.L'agent spécial Orson Fortune et son équipe recrutent l'une des plus grandes stars de cinéma pour les aider dans une mission d'infiltration lorsque la vente d'une nouvelle technologie d'armes mortelle menace de perturber l'ordre mondial.
- Réalisation
- Scénaristes
- Vedettes
Ayhan Eroglu
- Dimitry
- (as Ayhan Eroğlu)
6,3106.4K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Avis en vedette
Solid Action-Thriller without much depth
This afternoon I spontaneously went to see "Operation Fortune" in the cinema. Here is my spoiler-free review:
This is once again a typical Guy Ritchie film. You just notice his signature, in a mostly positive sense.
The story is relatively simple, but in places it is told in an unnecessarily complicated way. I found that better in "The Gentlemen" and "Cash Truck". The former has a more complex story with some twists and turns and more suspense, but without being complicated. The latter, on the other hand, is kept very simple and is also told in a relatively straightforward manner. In "Operation Fortune", on the other hand, some dialogues are strung together very quickly, so that I sometimes couldn't keep up with the many names and changes of location. That was a bit too fast for me. I hardly had time to think and let my thoughts run free. I'm not quite sure, but in my memory two or three situations didn't make direct sense and it seemed illogical how the characters behaved in those situations. Emotions are also very rare here in the plot. In any case, I couldn't really sympathize.
This brings us to the characters: They all remain pretty pale and it's really only about the direct situational action. You don't really learn much more about any of the characters. They are quite stereotypical. Hugh Grant's character is the best, I think, because he plays his role very well and somehow he seems much more tangible and interesting than the others. In general, he steals the show when he's in the picture. Wonderful! Jason Statham plays his cool and tough agent character as usual. But that's all there is to it. It's also nice to see Josh Hartnett in a bigger movie again. His role is that of an actor and he is the one who always tries to be witty, but he is also the "coward" of the film. Then there is Aubrey Plaza as Sarah Fidel. She is the intelligent one of the agent troop and shows the men again and again that she can do more than they give her credit for. Finally, there is Bugzy Malone as JJ Davies. He is also an agent and he is the quiet type and sniper who acts more from ambush. But he also remains very pale. All in all, the characters don't develop much and everyone plays his role here and remains trapped in this corset from beginning to end without breaking out of it, which is kind of a pity because I couldn't build up an emotional connection to any of the characters.
The action scenes are solid, but often they are hardly shown, as if there had been a lack of budget. But the hand-to-hand fights with Jason Statham are fun as always, even if he's a bit too good for me, because he never really gets hit himself. He can have a few more weaknesses.
The CGI effects are good and if I'm not mistaken, many scenes were shot directly on real locations, which I liked.
The cinematography is solid, the cuts are also okay and didn't stand out to me either positively or negatively.
The humor in the film is well measured and mostly manifests itself in dry sarcasm and a few quips, which I liked.
The music didn't strike me as particularly positive or negative.
Overall, "Operation Fortune" is a solid, good-looking action-agent thriller that follows in the footsteps of Mission: Impossible, but can never reach its class. A viewing is worthwhile, however, and you will definitely get your money's worth, if you don't set your expectations too high. However, you shouldn't expect the class and style of "The Gentlemen". "Operation Fortune" will certainly not stay in my memory for a very long time. But since I was well entertained and could easily overlook the weaknesses, I award a solid
7/10 points - Low rewatch value.
This is once again a typical Guy Ritchie film. You just notice his signature, in a mostly positive sense.
The story is relatively simple, but in places it is told in an unnecessarily complicated way. I found that better in "The Gentlemen" and "Cash Truck". The former has a more complex story with some twists and turns and more suspense, but without being complicated. The latter, on the other hand, is kept very simple and is also told in a relatively straightforward manner. In "Operation Fortune", on the other hand, some dialogues are strung together very quickly, so that I sometimes couldn't keep up with the many names and changes of location. That was a bit too fast for me. I hardly had time to think and let my thoughts run free. I'm not quite sure, but in my memory two or three situations didn't make direct sense and it seemed illogical how the characters behaved in those situations. Emotions are also very rare here in the plot. In any case, I couldn't really sympathize.
This brings us to the characters: They all remain pretty pale and it's really only about the direct situational action. You don't really learn much more about any of the characters. They are quite stereotypical. Hugh Grant's character is the best, I think, because he plays his role very well and somehow he seems much more tangible and interesting than the others. In general, he steals the show when he's in the picture. Wonderful! Jason Statham plays his cool and tough agent character as usual. But that's all there is to it. It's also nice to see Josh Hartnett in a bigger movie again. His role is that of an actor and he is the one who always tries to be witty, but he is also the "coward" of the film. Then there is Aubrey Plaza as Sarah Fidel. She is the intelligent one of the agent troop and shows the men again and again that she can do more than they give her credit for. Finally, there is Bugzy Malone as JJ Davies. He is also an agent and he is the quiet type and sniper who acts more from ambush. But he also remains very pale. All in all, the characters don't develop much and everyone plays his role here and remains trapped in this corset from beginning to end without breaking out of it, which is kind of a pity because I couldn't build up an emotional connection to any of the characters.
The action scenes are solid, but often they are hardly shown, as if there had been a lack of budget. But the hand-to-hand fights with Jason Statham are fun as always, even if he's a bit too good for me, because he never really gets hit himself. He can have a few more weaknesses.
The CGI effects are good and if I'm not mistaken, many scenes were shot directly on real locations, which I liked.
The cinematography is solid, the cuts are also okay and didn't stand out to me either positively or negatively.
The humor in the film is well measured and mostly manifests itself in dry sarcasm and a few quips, which I liked.
The music didn't strike me as particularly positive or negative.
Overall, "Operation Fortune" is a solid, good-looking action-agent thriller that follows in the footsteps of Mission: Impossible, but can never reach its class. A viewing is worthwhile, however, and you will definitely get your money's worth, if you don't set your expectations too high. However, you shouldn't expect the class and style of "The Gentlemen". "Operation Fortune" will certainly not stay in my memory for a very long time. But since I was well entertained and could easily overlook the weaknesses, I award a solid
7/10 points - Low rewatch value.
Rewatchable popcorn spy fun
'Operation Fortune: Ruse de Guerre' is the 5th time director Guy Ritchie has used Jason Statham in one of his films - and if it ain't broke, don't fix it! This is a pretty straight-forward spy-action-adventure, with a fair bit of comedy thrown in - closer to 'The Man From U. N. C. L. E.' than 'Wrath of Man'. I'd say I liked it better than 'The Gentlemen', but not as much as 'Snatch'. There is only minor introductions for Orson Fortune (Statham), Sarah (Plaza) and JJ (Malone) as the spy team working for Nathan (Elwes), before we're off and running.
Not sure why the "Ruse de Guerre" suffix was needed, but it translates as a cunning war trick. I assume it also helps if there are to be sequels. The trick is that the team use actor Danny Francesco (Hartnett) as bait for billionaire arms-dealer Greg Simmonds (Grant), to track a stolen weapon. Most of the plot is quite formulaic, but Statham & Ritchie know how to stage action scenes and there's plenty of exciting moments.
Hartnett plays spoiled actor well; Plaza has plenty of fun; Malone, Elwes and Statham are all solid; with Hugh Grant relishing the role, having even more fun than he did in 'The Gentlemen'. Not too long, satisfying ending, noting too new, but a nice mix of comedy and action with a good cast.
Not sure why the "Ruse de Guerre" suffix was needed, but it translates as a cunning war trick. I assume it also helps if there are to be sequels. The trick is that the team use actor Danny Francesco (Hartnett) as bait for billionaire arms-dealer Greg Simmonds (Grant), to track a stolen weapon. Most of the plot is quite formulaic, but Statham & Ritchie know how to stage action scenes and there's plenty of exciting moments.
Hartnett plays spoiled actor well; Plaza has plenty of fun; Malone, Elwes and Statham are all solid; with Hugh Grant relishing the role, having even more fun than he did in 'The Gentlemen'. Not too long, satisfying ending, noting too new, but a nice mix of comedy and action with a good cast.
Lacking in jokes. Lacking in real thrill. Middle of the road spy flick.
The good: Hugh Grant is brilliant in his role as a powerful mastermind criminal. But that's not enough...
The bad: this spy flick is lacking in real thrill. And it definitely intended to be a real thrilling spy flick. One down.
More bad: the jokes arent really funny. Missing the mark almost every time. That's two down.
Even more bad: the supporting actors are bland. All of them. That's three down.
Beware all you Jason Statham fans, this movie surely aint a terrible spy action flick, but it is definitely not Jason Statham's best either, because I have seen all his moves before, done better. And although the quirky and wonderful actress Aubrey Plaza is co starring I must admit that even her role is not her best either.
So what we have here is a below average spy flick, that just wont get really exciting.
Still worth a watch, but dont expect any originality or real thrill. It'll do as a mindless throwaway spy flick.
The bad: this spy flick is lacking in real thrill. And it definitely intended to be a real thrilling spy flick. One down.
More bad: the jokes arent really funny. Missing the mark almost every time. That's two down.
Even more bad: the supporting actors are bland. All of them. That's three down.
Beware all you Jason Statham fans, this movie surely aint a terrible spy action flick, but it is definitely not Jason Statham's best either, because I have seen all his moves before, done better. And although the quirky and wonderful actress Aubrey Plaza is co starring I must admit that even her role is not her best either.
So what we have here is a below average spy flick, that just wont get really exciting.
Still worth a watch, but dont expect any originality or real thrill. It'll do as a mindless throwaway spy flick.
Super average action flick.
As a generic action flick I guess this is sort of ok. For the new Guy Ritchie film its super disappointing. The only stand out aspect is Hugh Grant who is excellent. The rest, from storyline, acting, action sequences, comedy are all incredibly mediocre. Statham does his most basic Statham when he can do much more given the script and direction. Aubrey is ok, i think she was supposed to be funny though and she isnt at all, that isnt her problem because she is generally awesome. The other guy, was just filler, im not sure what he was even there for. The main thing though is the story, its just nothing, it could be a Steven Seagal movie it has no twists turns or surprises.
Not one of Ritchie's best
This would be a "straight to DVD" if not for Guy Ritchie. As a Ritchie-fan i was quite disappointed walking home from the theatre. I miss the dialogue Guy Ritchie is known for. The scence of black humor we know from other Guy Ritchie movies is also missing.
Hugh Grant saves the day with his performance, but we also see terrible acting from Josh Hartnett among others. Statham is Statham, nothing more, nothing less.
Don't spend your money watching this film in theatres. In a few weeks, it will probably be available on Netflix and as a tuesday evening timekiller it's probably worth watching. Be better next time Guy, we know that you could do better.
Hugh Grant saves the day with his performance, but we also see terrible acting from Josh Hartnett among others. Statham is Statham, nothing more, nothing less.
Don't spend your money watching this film in theatres. In a few weeks, it will probably be available on Netflix and as a tuesday evening timekiller it's probably worth watching. Be better next time Guy, we know that you could do better.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesGuy Ritchie rewrote the script when he came on board but he also actively encouraged his cast to improvise as much as possible. Aubrey Plaza was particularly pleased with this style of direction.
- GaffesOrson connects his gas canister to the external compressor of the air conditioned. This would not cause the gas to be vented into the interior of the property as it's part of the closed coolant loop. All it would do is break the AC.
- Générique farfeluThere is a mid-credits scene where Danny plays the role of an arms dealer.
- ConnexionsFeatures Butch Cassidy et le Kid (1969)
- Bandes originales7 Heures du Matin
Music by Jacqueline Taïeb
Lyrics by Jacqueline Taïeb
Performed by Jacqueline Taïeb
Courtesy of FGL Productions
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Operation Fortune: Ruse de Guerre?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Operation Fortune
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 50 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 6 496 125 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 3 140 214 $ US
- 5 mars 2023
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 48 983 306 $ US
- Durée
- 1h 54m(114 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant






