Une équipe de pêcheurs s'aventure dans des eaux dangereuses lorsque leurs dettes commencent à s'accumuler.Une équipe de pêcheurs s'aventure dans des eaux dangereuses lorsque leurs dettes commencent à s'accumuler.Une équipe de pêcheurs s'aventure dans des eaux dangereuses lorsque leurs dettes commencent à s'accumuler.
- Réalisation
- Scénariste
- Vedettes
- Prix
- 2 nominations au total
Brian J. McDonald
- Paul
- (as Brian McDonald)
6,112.8K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Avis en vedette
A slow burner for sure, but gradually becomes an incredible emotional ride
This is a very good picture, one that has quickly become one of my favorite this year. It is not an action movie, far from it, and not a crime story either. It is all about human emotions, and how we deal with them. Don't make me wrong: it is quite slow in development (of the story), but grows and grows, and gradually grows on you. By the time it ends, you feel emotionally lifted. All the attributes of a good movie are there: the production value is first class, the acting is impeccable as so is the direction, with the editing and the score not far behind. If you liked 'Fathers and Daughters' (2015), this project is definitely for you.
Kind of missed opportunity
I have been waiting for this movie for over a year. It was stuck in post-production for some time and was finally released a few days ago.
The truth is, I had high expectations for the story, especially from a writer/director of Helgeland's level.
I don't know what he originally had in mind, but he has put two films in one here. On the one hand, it's a family drama; on the other, it's a drug deal gone wrong that doesn't make a good transition and, on top of that, an almost unnecessary love story.
It has a somewhat OK third act, which has enough tension but raises many questions.
On the good side now. The cinematography is excellent, and the transitions between city and sea scenes work nicely. The cast is well chosen, and for the most part, the actors know where they need to be. And, of course, the two strongest cards of the film are Tommy Lee Jones and Ben Foster in the role of father and son.
Although it's a nearly three-decade-old project, it could have been executed way better, especially when the person working on it has such an impressive track record under his belt.
I give it a 6/10, mainly due to acting.
The truth is, I had high expectations for the story, especially from a writer/director of Helgeland's level.
I don't know what he originally had in mind, but he has put two films in one here. On the one hand, it's a family drama; on the other, it's a drug deal gone wrong that doesn't make a good transition and, on top of that, an almost unnecessary love story.
It has a somewhat OK third act, which has enough tension but raises many questions.
On the good side now. The cinematography is excellent, and the transitions between city and sea scenes work nicely. The cast is well chosen, and for the most part, the actors know where they need to be. And, of course, the two strongest cards of the film are Tommy Lee Jones and Ben Foster in the role of father and son.
Although it's a nearly three-decade-old project, it could have been executed way better, especially when the person working on it has such an impressive track record under his belt.
I give it a 6/10, mainly due to acting.
Watch it with the right mindset
All these critics and people on here are bagging this film. I get it, you want action, twists, a plot that goes along quickly and more, more, more. Well don't watch this movie then. Simple really.
If you approach a film with the right mindset (like this one) and don't expect to be blown away you can actually enjoy its nuance, acting and glimpse into sea fishing. I enjoyed it for those reasons. It's definitely a meandering film with some scenes not driving anywhere - they're there instead to develop characters.
This film is a character family drama with a small crime element. It's mis marketed in my opinion. Just watch it causally and enjoy the acting. And for the bad scenes that don't really work, just appreciate it for what it is. Good acting. 6.4/10.
If you approach a film with the right mindset (like this one) and don't expect to be blown away you can actually enjoy its nuance, acting and glimpse into sea fishing. I enjoyed it for those reasons. It's definitely a meandering film with some scenes not driving anywhere - they're there instead to develop characters.
This film is a character family drama with a small crime element. It's mis marketed in my opinion. Just watch it causally and enjoy the acting. And for the bad scenes that don't really work, just appreciate it for what it is. Good acting. 6.4/10.
Stellar performance by Tommy Lee Jones, but that is about the only real positive this movie has to offer
Quite a slowburning, bleak and depressive story, that is certainly not suited for the casual viewer who might be (wrongfully) expecting some sort of fun action thriller, which it is definitely not and was never meant to be either...
The good: Tommy Lee Jones steals the show with his stellar performance as the father of a son (Ben Foster) in dire money troubles. But as magnificent the performance of mister Tommy Lee Jones may be, actor Ben Foster just didnt cut it in the dramatic scenes, in which he (and all the other actors for that matter) failed to deliver true drama.
True drama needs credible acting performances from ALL the actors concerned. Now we have only Tommy Lee Jones performance to deliver true drama, but his role (however important) was of a supporting nature, which makes us viewers have to deal with other leading actors who fail to impress.
The good: Tommy Lee Jones steals the show with his stellar performance as the father of a son (Ben Foster) in dire money troubles. But as magnificent the performance of mister Tommy Lee Jones may be, actor Ben Foster just didnt cut it in the dramatic scenes, in which he (and all the other actors for that matter) failed to deliver true drama.
True drama needs credible acting performances from ALL the actors concerned. Now we have only Tommy Lee Jones performance to deliver true drama, but his role (however important) was of a supporting nature, which makes us viewers have to deal with other leading actors who fail to impress.
Decent watch, flawed writing
I don't understand why this film seems to inspire such a strong love/hate reaction in so many people. Perhaps people expected some high-stakes crime film. I will agree that the plot blurbs on this movie are a bit misleading, as crime is only a part of this film. If you don't expect to be blown away then I think it makes the experience more enjoyable. It is a good, though perhaps dramatic portrayal of the North Atlantic fishing industry, and actually a refreshing watch in the face of so many bland Hollywood films that attempt to tackle similar issues. The acting was good, not perfect, but still very decent. My biggest complaint would be the writing. It felt like they tried to cram every genre trope into one two-hour package. It also has a predictable feel-good ending. Had some of the events been shaved off to allow for more realistic character growth then it would have been a much more moving story. In the end it's an admirable attempt at tackling serious issues that's held down by its own ambition.
Taylor Sheridan Projects, Ranked by IMDb Users
Taylor Sheridan Projects, Ranked by IMDb Users
From "Mayor of Kingstown" to "Yellowstone," check out writer/director Taylor Sheridan's most popular movies and TV series on IMDb, ranked by user rating.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesWhen the project was announced, Jake Gyllenhaal, Ansel Elgort, and Zendaya were cast in the lead roles. All dropped out after the project was stuck in development for several years. The roles later went to Ben Foster, Toby Wallace, and Jenna Ortega.
- GaffesMabel says she needs to write an essay to apply to community college but all community colleges have an open admissions policy. Anyone with a high school diploma or GED can simply enroll in classes.
- Bandes originalesNew Sensation
Written by Andrew Farriss (as Andrew Charles Farriss) and Michael Hutchence
Performed by INXS
Courtesy of Petrol Records
Under license from Universal Music Enterprises
Courtesy of Atlantic Recording Corp.
By arrangement with Warner Music Group Film & TV Licensing
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Finestkind?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Найкращий вид
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée
- 2h 6m(126 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant







