Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA detached orphan teen escapes to the future, but when he arrives at a natural utopia, he must evade a lynch mob convinced that he's the prophesied Devil's Child.A detached orphan teen escapes to the future, but when he arrives at a natural utopia, he must evade a lynch mob convinced that he's the prophesied Devil's Child.A detached orphan teen escapes to the future, but when he arrives at a natural utopia, he must evade a lynch mob convinced that he's the prophesied Devil's Child.
- Prix
- 1 victoire et 1 nomination au total
Roe Pacheco
- Sally
- (as Rosemary Pacheco)
Avis en vedette
The movie has a good storyline. Too bad it wasn't done with a higher budget. Edward Pritchard plays David, a real boring young man who travels to the future. There he meets Nalia, a cute girl from the future. Sounds interesting, right? Wrong.
I made it to the point where a character named Samuel appears. Samuel is played by David Afflick. After a few minutes of Samuel, I stopped watching. I could feel my brain cells dying, and I didn't want to risk my health any further. This character would have great in the movie "Troll 2."
There should be a documentary made about this character. I want to see the director actually say, "... and cut. Good job, David" after one of Samuel's scenes. Fascinating.
I made it to the point where a character named Samuel appears. Samuel is played by David Afflick. After a few minutes of Samuel, I stopped watching. I could feel my brain cells dying, and I didn't want to risk my health any further. This character would have great in the movie "Troll 2."
There should be a documentary made about this character. I want to see the director actually say, "... and cut. Good job, David" after one of Samuel's scenes. Fascinating.
This movie is awful. Mostly because of bad acting. Not the young female actor but basically everyone else. I almost wish I would have read the book. The movie has great premise but needs most of the characters recast
I have three words for this movie:
Terr-i-ble.
It may have had a great story but I couldn't follow it. The acting; the acting. I normally would disregard bad acting if the story was intriguing. But I didn't pay great attention and wasn't worth it. Played in the background while I looked at stories on my phone 📱.
Like the rest of 2020, this has become a mess of gigantic proportions
it had potential, but lost track of where it was going - and with a cast that has little to no spark on screen, lousy effects, poor development, lost story, boring props and no sountrack to blend in to make this any more interesting...this just drags on far too long
if the timing was cut and it even had remotely interesting dialog and some thought given about advancements in the future, this could have been interesting - instead it was a bore which dragged on longer than it needed to be - and with the lack of budget to sustain anything that was needed, the basic design of the story made it a total drag to sit through
I wasn't looking for the next Star Trek or Star Wars, but when the poster is more impressive than the film, then there's a serious problem
hopefully your next effort is more entertaining, more thought put into it - and a bigger budget with stuff that makes it interesting
for a future world, this is less interesting than the stone age - and for all the advacements of travel, they have next to nothing for living - less than a jail cell
and that is where it all falls apart...more than the tiring story
it had potential, but lost track of where it was going - and with a cast that has little to no spark on screen, lousy effects, poor development, lost story, boring props and no sountrack to blend in to make this any more interesting...this just drags on far too long
if the timing was cut and it even had remotely interesting dialog and some thought given about advancements in the future, this could have been interesting - instead it was a bore which dragged on longer than it needed to be - and with the lack of budget to sustain anything that was needed, the basic design of the story made it a total drag to sit through
I wasn't looking for the next Star Trek or Star Wars, but when the poster is more impressive than the film, then there's a serious problem
hopefully your next effort is more entertaining, more thought put into it - and a bigger budget with stuff that makes it interesting
for a future world, this is less interesting than the stone age - and for all the advacements of travel, they have next to nothing for living - less than a jail cell
and that is where it all falls apart...more than the tiring story
Le saviez-vous
- Anecdotes"Escape 2120" is based on the novel "The Magician's Horses" by Brian Bennett.
- GaffesWhen Doc sets the timer for the trip, he enters 52,594,560 seconds. This is only 608 days, or about 1 year 8 months, not the 100 years he was planning to travel. It is very unlikely someone of his background would make such a mistake.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Escape 2120?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Tulevikku
- Lieux de tournage
- Marietta, Ohio, États-Unis(Dave's home town)
- société de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 40 000 $ US (estimation)
- Durée
- 1h 47m(107 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant