Next Time I Marry

Lucille Ball -- in her first role heading the cast list -- wants to marry foreign fortune hunter Lee Bowman, but her father's will says she must marry an ordinary American if she is to inherit enough money to make her the richest woman in America. So she goes down a line of ditch diggers and settles on James Ellison and his Great Dane. She marries him, abandons him at a drug store and is going to get a divorce, but Ellison won't be the goat, so for reasons too tiresome to mention, they wind up going together to Reno in a trailer.

That's what's wrong with this screwball comedy. On the other hand, Garson Kanin directs with a light hand, and Miss Ball gives a good performance, without any of the mannerisms (funny though they would be) she would develop as she learned how to do comedy. See if you can spot Ned Glass in his third screen appearance. Hint: he has hair.

Heiress Nancy Crocker Fleming (Lucille Ball) grabs a random guy on the WPA ditch digging line and pays him $793 to get marry. Anthony J. Anthony has only his dog and his car trailer. Nancy's dead father had left his fortune to her only if she marries a "plain American". She intends to divorce Tony as soon as the money comes in and end the secret fake marriage. Foreigner Count Georgi is eager to marry her. When she accidentally drives away with Tony's dog, he come looking for her. The cops are called in and he's arrested for kidnapping.

The humor is definitely of its time. At least, Lucille Ball is allowed to do some physical comedy. Lighting the trailer on fire is something akin to I Love Lucy. The movie stays in that pocket of weird quirkiness. The subject matter is weird. Nancy and Tony could do a funnier meet-cute. The start is rushing too quickly. The first meeting would work better if Nancy's dilemma is explained at the top. Comedy is in the eye of the beholder. Time and culture has a way of making jokes not funny. I try to keep this in mind. This is a comedy of its time.

Far-fetched bit of fluff starring Lucille Ball as an heiress who pays a complete stranger to marry her. Ditch digger James Ellison is the lucky groom. Why she does this is because of a stipulation in her father's will that says she can't get her inheritance unless she marries a "plain American." Apparently her father was worried about foreign gold diggers seducing his daughter for her money. I've seen this theme in a lot of movies from the '30s so I guess there was an epidemic of international gold diggers fleecing unsuspecting American heiresses back then. Once married, Lucy will inherit the money and then she can divorce Ellison and marry the guy she's really interested in, foreign gold digger Lee Bowman. Guess Dad knew what he was doing, after all. Anyway, Lucy plans to divorce Ellison but he gets ticked off and decides to divorce her first to publicly humiliate her or something. I was a little unclear about the reasoning there but they had to have a conflict to fill time, I suppose.

This is a rather lame screwball comedy that suffers from having unlikable characters doing unrelatable things. Lucy's pretty but there's very little of her comedic abilities on display here. Her character is insufferable. The only scene I can think of that hinted at the greatness to come for her is the scene where she and the dog tussle over some bacon. James Ellison is a sort of poor man's Joel McCrea. It's hard to really root for him either since he was mercenary enough to marry a woman he just met for money. It's a staple of screwball comedies to put characters in extraordinary situations and have them act as absurdly as possible. But it only works when you like the characters. If you don't, their madcap antics are just annoying. Don't even get me started on how this affects the romantic element of the movie. And what was with that dark and totally out of place scene where it's implied the two guys are about to rape Lucy? Creepy. Anything with Lucy is worth seeing but this is one where I doubt you'll be in any hurry to rewatch it.

I love Lucy, and she's adorable as usual in this pleasant outing, but James Ellison shows why he should have been cast in many more and different roles.

Yes, he was a great cowboy, but as a leading man, he was good-looking and manly and confident and in control.

As another reviewer said, this is pleasant fluff; and it has a story that has been used probably countless times in one form or another, but the four major characters are played so well, with Lee Bowman as the competitor for the rich woman and Mantan Moreland as his chauffeur, it's more than worth watching, just to see them.

Other, even unbilled, performers such as the great Earl Hodgins, work beautifully under director Garson Kanin and make this fun and worth the time. Enjoy.

This odd little movie sets out to prove that any white American male, randomly selected off the street, can easily outsmart a team consisting of a foreigner, a woman and a black person.

Lucille Ball's recently-deceased father insists, in his will, that she must marry a "plain American" to inherit his fortune. So she offers money to various "plain American" men on the street in return for agreeing to marry her, and finally one accepts. After she marries the man, Ball sets off for Reno in the company of the foreign husband she really wants to marry and her black "yowza, ma'am" chauffeur, to get a divorce and collect her father's inheritance. But our smug and somewhat smarmy "plain American" blocks her at every turn, which includes forcibly putting her over his shoulder and kidnapping her, soaking her with a hose, and locking her in a trailer while driving recklessly through rough terrain, until she flees in panic and is nearly raped by two passers-by. Yeah, quite a laugh riot, all right.

But on the plus side, being saved from a near-rape seems to cause Lucille Ball to fall in love with the "plain American." So there you go.

The phrase "mighty white of you" makes its appearance just minutes into the film, and a string of "yowzas" emerge from the black guy a little bit later. While I promise you I'm in no way a member of the Politically Correct squad, the whole movie made me cringe, and really prevented any enjoyment I may have gotten from it. Were things that much different in 1938? Maybe so, but I'm glad we've moved to where we are now.