Un fou à une main (il a perdu la main en échappant à une pendaison) utilise divers dispositifs détachables comme armes du crime pour se venger de ceux qu'il pense lui avoir fait du tort.Un fou à une main (il a perdu la main en échappant à une pendaison) utilise divers dispositifs détachables comme armes du crime pour se venger de ceux qu'il pense lui avoir fait du tort.Un fou à une main (il a perdu la main en échappant à une pendaison) utilise divers dispositifs détachables comme armes du crime pour se venger de ceux qu'il pense lui avoir fait du tort.
- Réalisation
- Scénaristes
- Vedettes
- Senor Pepe De Reyes
- (as Tun Tun)
- Tour Group Member
- (uncredited)
Avis en vedette
Horror Delight Despite the Fear Flasher and Horror Horn
horror with a gimmick
This is an old horror with a gimmick. At the beginning, the narrator explains the Fear Flasher and Horror Horn would precede the most horrific scenes. That is the best part of the movie. It's campy and fun in treating it seriously. The actual use of the gimmick does not do much. The grotesque violent scenes are not so shocking especially with modern horror eyes. There is blood but the camera cuts away before the actual violence. The story starts interesting but it flounders in the second half. The characters don't have the special interest and the actors are not the most charismatic. It's a passable bland old horror with a cheesy gimmick which is more fun in the imagination than it is in reality.
William Castle meets Jacques Tourneur at Hammer Studios
Silly but enjoyable
This was originally made for TV but was considered too gruesome (at the time) and released to theatres. It was also put on with a VERY fun gimmick--the Fear Flasher and Horror Horn. When the supposedly gruesome parts were coming the frame froze, flashed red and a horn sounded to warn people! The "gruesome" parts are ridiculously tame by todays standards and wouldn't scare a child. In fact I originally saw this on TV uncut during the afternoon in the 1970s when I was in grade school! Didn't scare me at all. Still the acting is good, the atmosphere is spooky and it moves at a fast clip. Silly but fun. I give it a 7.
A thrilling film with occasional lapses in the writing...but it's still well worth seeing.
The film begins with a truly horrifying and wonderful scene in which a total psycho (Patrick O'Neal) forces a minister to marry him....to a dead woman!! The guy is 100% nuts but clever--and manages to elude the police for some times after this. Eventually, when he is captured, he manages to escape both times--and I won't go in to detail about it, but the second time is a doozy and everyone assumes he's dead! And, from here on, the film bears a lot of similarity to the wonderful film "House of Wax" (the Vincent Price version, not the new crappy one) as well as the Dr. Phibes films--some amazingly gory murders, all in the name of revenge. This portion of the film is pretty good, albeit a bit slow at times.
What intrigued me about this film was seeing Patrick O'Neal in a role totally unlike his other film and TV appearances. He was good, mind you--but NOT the typical sort of O'Neal! Also I appreciated that although the subject matter was grisly, it was not at all explicit--and the red flashing lights really weren't necessary. I am thrilled, as I think many horror films just go too far.
Overall, I liked this film very much--O'Neal's character was great and the story quite exciting. The only serious problems were the occasional bad writing, as intended victims just acted too dumb at times--such as the cop (Wayne Rogers) who chose to look for a serial killer out to kill him TOTALLY ALONE! When this character found O'Neal, instead of shooting him on sight, he allowed him to get close to him...too close. Another case of bad writing involved the assistant, Pepe, who hears a noise and TELLS NO ONE--going to investigate it himself!! Too dumb--and sad because otherwise it was a thrilling little movie.
By the way, the way the film ended it seemed apparent this was meant as either a TV pilot or the first in a series. Sadly, this was not to be.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesAccording to an article in the 9/28/66 edition of "Variety", this film was the second-most profitable film in release at the time.
- GaffesAt the police department, on the door to room 112 it states it is the Exhibits Room, but in the hall outside, room 112 is indicated as the District Attorney's office.
- Citations
Anthony Draco: Can you describe him?
Marie Champlain: He's... he's tall and uh... he's dark and um... uh... soft-spoken. He moves very quietly. What's wrong me? He's the easiest man in the world to identify. His right hand is missing.
- Générique farfeluPatrick O'Neal, the villain of the piece, is inexplicably omitted from the cast list in the end titles.
- Autres versionsProduced as a TV series pilot, this film was determined to be too violent for the small screen and given theatrical distribution instead. Added for this release was an exploitation device called the "Fear Flasher/Horror Horn", ostensibly to warn the audience of the "Four Supreme Fright Points" (although it was not applied to the picture's most explicitly violent moment, the climactic fate of the villain). This device was explained in an introductory sequence narrated by William Conrad. Upon first showing on US network television, both the device and its explanation were deleted, but in subsequent syndication to local stations in the 1970s and '80s, some such prints were seen.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Deadly Earnest's Spooky Colour Marathon (1975)
- Bandes originalesAn der schönen, blauen Donau, Op. 314 (On the Beautiful Blue Danube)
(uncredited)
Music by Johann Strauss
Played at the party
Meilleurs choix
- How long is Chamber of Horrors?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Die Schreckenskammer
- Lieux de tournage
- société de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée
- 1h 20m(80 min)
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1







