ÉVALUATION IMDb
7,0/10
1,4 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueFollowing his release from Slade prison, Fletcher tries to stick to the straight and narrow, but it isn't easy.Following his release from Slade prison, Fletcher tries to stick to the straight and narrow, but it isn't easy.Following his release from Slade prison, Fletcher tries to stick to the straight and narrow, but it isn't easy.
- A remporté le prix 2 BAFTA Awards
- 2 victoires au total
Parcourir les épisodes
7,01.4K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Avis en vedette
Excellent sequel, tragically early cancellation
Couldn't agree more with another review on here, if both shows we're called "Fletcher" no-one would have spotted the join between this and Porridge.
Ronnie Barker just as great as ever. And what a tragedy we lost Richard Beckinsale so early, truly talented young actor.
Along with a supporting cast of Fulton Mackay (even though only 1 episode) and Patricia Brake as Fletch's daughter. Even a very young Nicholas Lyndhurst as his son.
Maybe the support hasn't got as many purely comical characters as Porridge (Warren, Maclaren, Ives, Barrowclough etc) which probably just takes the slight edge off if you wanted to compare the series seperately.
Still worth a revisit, or getting acquainted with if you liked Porridge and didn't catch this. And a catchy theme tune just to add the finishing touch. Great memories
A pretty good sequel series
The ongoing adventures of Fletcher after he leaves prison. And whilst it falls just short of that brilliant show it is still better than a lot of other comedies.
That's not to say it's terrible, because it isn't. But when you are trying to make a sequel to comedy gold and it comes out silver then a slight disappointment may appear. Many of the original cast make appearances but the scenario and situation means that some of the original zeitgeist disappears. Ronnie Barker is uniformly excellent of course but a little of the magic that made Porridge such a memorable and brilliantly written series has been lost at this point. However there are still enough laughs to keep it going. Worth watching but not quite as memorable as it's predecessor series.
That's not to say it's terrible, because it isn't. But when you are trying to make a sequel to comedy gold and it comes out silver then a slight disappointment may appear. Many of the original cast make appearances but the scenario and situation means that some of the original zeitgeist disappears. Ronnie Barker is uniformly excellent of course but a little of the magic that made Porridge such a memorable and brilliantly written series has been lost at this point. However there are still enough laughs to keep it going. Worth watching but not quite as memorable as it's predecessor series.
Who said sequels don't pack the same punch!?
Well, I got the DVD of Going Straight the other week, and put it with my DVDs for Porridge. I've read all that stuff that says GS wasn't received as fondly as Porridge - and I've also read that Ronnie Barker thinks it's just as good. I am in full agreement with Mr Barker here.
First off - yes, Going Straight dispensed with the "less is more" approach that made Porridge (and almost all the greatest sitcoms bar Fawlty Towers) so brilliant. But that's the only problem I have with it.
I suspect that the people who dismiss this show were disappointed because it wasn't just more Porridge. Well, the whole point is that he's been released on parole. Alternately, for the people who miss Warren, Lukewarm and Grouty - remember that they were all sent down from different parts of the country, and so when released, all went home to different parts of the country. To have them all on the outside together would not be realistic. The only fellow ex-con to be kept in the series was, of course, Lennie Godber. Plus Fletch's daughter Ingrid has a much bigger part in this series - again, to be expected.
Certainly, the series still has the same emotional resonance - Porridge dealt with the pressures of being in prison, and Going Straight deals with life on the outside for ex-prisoners, and the prejudices they are up against. Much like the prejudices that sequels tend to be up against . . .
Overall, I like this series. Not quite as much as Porridge, I'll admit. But certainly enough to recommend it to anyone who is a fan of Porridge. Who said that sequels aren't as good?!
First off - yes, Going Straight dispensed with the "less is more" approach that made Porridge (and almost all the greatest sitcoms bar Fawlty Towers) so brilliant. But that's the only problem I have with it.
I suspect that the people who dismiss this show were disappointed because it wasn't just more Porridge. Well, the whole point is that he's been released on parole. Alternately, for the people who miss Warren, Lukewarm and Grouty - remember that they were all sent down from different parts of the country, and so when released, all went home to different parts of the country. To have them all on the outside together would not be realistic. The only fellow ex-con to be kept in the series was, of course, Lennie Godber. Plus Fletch's daughter Ingrid has a much bigger part in this series - again, to be expected.
Certainly, the series still has the same emotional resonance - Porridge dealt with the pressures of being in prison, and Going Straight deals with life on the outside for ex-prisoners, and the prejudices they are up against. Much like the prejudices that sequels tend to be up against . . .
Overall, I like this series. Not quite as much as Porridge, I'll admit. But certainly enough to recommend it to anyone who is a fan of Porridge. Who said that sequels aren't as good?!
I'm Going Straight as an Arr'aw - and with a Bafta!
Like Porridge, Going Straight was a series that was to shine! In 1978 it won a Bafta TV Award and rightly so! With a fantastic theme tune (If you can find the elongated version on LP - do its magnificent!),Writing team and the superb acting of Ronnie Barker- Fulton Mackay and Richard Beckinsale who could say it was bad? As many posters have said here - it didn't live up to the expectations of Porridge and in a way this "could" be correct, but i feel it packs the same punch! It shows the strain of trying to reintegrate back into life, on the straight and narrow, fighting back temptation and the leering face of crime and Barker plays this to an Art! Be it the wittiness of Fletch,The stupidity of remarks from Raymond or the "happy ending" - The series is memorable for it.
And to say that Barker said it was up there with Porridge - what more can one say!
And to say that Barker said it was up there with Porridge - what more can one say!
A worthy follow up
Ian La Frenais and Dick Clement did a solid job of following up a classic comedy by giving Ronnie Barker's great character Fletch another opportunity to shine.
Instead of prison life, Fletch negotiates his way through the unforgiving economic climate of 70s Britain. In six episodes, we see him attempt to rebuild his life, which has some fairly compelling moments. Will he go straight or revert to type?
Naturally, it has lots of humour thanks to the numerous situations the writers devise to generate laughs. The banter is as strong as Porridge and delivered wonderfully by Barker. The only weaker aspect in comparison is that Going Straight mostly relies on Barker and, in some scenes, his partnership with Richard Beckinsale to carry it. Porridge had an impressive range of characters that complemented each other so well.
My favourite episodes are 'Going Home', 'Going, Going, Gone', and 'Going Off the Rails'. However, all six are worth watching if you like Barker and Porridge.
For me, it's a 7.5/10, but I round up.
Instead of prison life, Fletch negotiates his way through the unforgiving economic climate of 70s Britain. In six episodes, we see him attempt to rebuild his life, which has some fairly compelling moments. Will he go straight or revert to type?
Naturally, it has lots of humour thanks to the numerous situations the writers devise to generate laughs. The banter is as strong as Porridge and delivered wonderfully by Barker. The only weaker aspect in comparison is that Going Straight mostly relies on Barker and, in some scenes, his partnership with Richard Beckinsale to carry it. Porridge had an impressive range of characters that complemented each other so well.
My favourite episodes are 'Going Home', 'Going, Going, Gone', and 'Going Off the Rails'. However, all six are worth watching if you like Barker and Porridge.
For me, it's a 7.5/10, but I round up.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesDespite winning a BAFTA for best comedy, it was felt by many involved that the show was too much in the shadow of Porridge and lacked the sparkle of its predecessor. Producer, Sydney Lotterby, said that Fletcher and Godber lacked purpose and context outside of the prison setting and that it was 'almost inevitable that there wouldn't have been a second series' regardless of Richard Beckinsale's subsequent death. According to the writers there was only ever meant to be one series, as Ronnie Barker would only agree to do six episodes.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Ronnie Barker Interview (2001)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How many seasons does Going Straight have?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant





