ÉVALUATION IMDb
6,6/10
4,2 k
MA NOTE
Les usines de transformation du poisson sont vides parce que les sardines n'existent plus dans ces eaux.Les usines de transformation du poisson sont vides parce que les sardines n'existent plus dans ces eaux.Les usines de transformation du poisson sont vides parce que les sardines n'existent plus dans ces eaux.
John Huston
- Narrator
- (voice)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe character of "Doc" is based on John Steinbeck's friend "Doc" Ricketts (Edward Flanders Robb Ricketts), a pioneering marine biologist who wrote the classic "Between Pacific Tides." He and Steinbeck collaborated on the book "Log of the Sea of Cortez."
- GaffesWhen Mack sits down at the open upright piano and starts playing during the final party scene, none of the hammers - which are clearly visible - move.
- Citations
Suzy DeSoto: I'd still like a job.
Fauna Flood: As what?
Suzy DeSoto: You know, a... floozy.
Fauna Flood: Well first off, we don't call ourselves floozies in here. And second, you ever done this kind of thing before?
Suzy DeSoto: [sarcastically] Whadda ya gotta do besides lie down?
Fauna Flood: You gotta pretend that you like it!
- Bandes originalesBIG NOISE FROM WINNETKA
Music by Bob Haggart and Ray Bauduc
Lyrics by Gil Rodin and Bob Crosby
Performed by Bob Crosby and the Bobcats
Courtesy of MCA Records
Commentaire en vedette
The one author whose writing I consistently enjoy reading is John Steinbeck.
Cannery Row is my favorite of his stories. I've read my way through one paperback and am now preserving my second. His short novel "Sweet Thursday" is as much of a sequel to Cannery Row as it's possible to be.
The only non-paper version of the tale that I rate at least as highly as the book is the audio version, narrated by Jerry Farden. If the book is a 10, Jerry's reading is a 15. It's difficult to track down, though. If you want a real treat for your ears and your mind, get it.
Back to the movie. It's difficult to appreciate a film when you've read the book beforehand. And vice versa. So when I borrowed the VHS a few years ago, I had plenty of preconceptions, and some eager anticipation. It didn't take long for my preconceptions to shatter the anticipation.
This movie is NOT Cannery Row, but a mix of parts of it and Sweet Thursday.
I could easily be critical of it... Nick Nolte is much too much of a Man, and does not fit my mental image of Ed Ricketts at all. Debra Winger fits, more or less. The mix of two books changed the whole pace of the story, and spoiled it wholesale. There were bright spots, but tainted with those same old preconceptions.
So, don't expect to see a visual equivalent of the books, because it isn't. I don't go along with those who say that it's not worth watching. It's different than the book, and sometimes that can be hard to work through.
But, standing apart from the books, the movie is good. Darn good. It is well worth at least two viewings. And, I think, the more it's viewed, the better it gets.
Cannery Row is my favorite of his stories. I've read my way through one paperback and am now preserving my second. His short novel "Sweet Thursday" is as much of a sequel to Cannery Row as it's possible to be.
The only non-paper version of the tale that I rate at least as highly as the book is the audio version, narrated by Jerry Farden. If the book is a 10, Jerry's reading is a 15. It's difficult to track down, though. If you want a real treat for your ears and your mind, get it.
Back to the movie. It's difficult to appreciate a film when you've read the book beforehand. And vice versa. So when I borrowed the VHS a few years ago, I had plenty of preconceptions, and some eager anticipation. It didn't take long for my preconceptions to shatter the anticipation.
This movie is NOT Cannery Row, but a mix of parts of it and Sweet Thursday.
I could easily be critical of it... Nick Nolte is much too much of a Man, and does not fit my mental image of Ed Ricketts at all. Debra Winger fits, more or less. The mix of two books changed the whole pace of the story, and spoiled it wholesale. There were bright spots, but tainted with those same old preconceptions.
So, don't expect to see a visual equivalent of the books, because it isn't. I don't go along with those who say that it's not worth watching. It's different than the book, and sometimes that can be hard to work through.
But, standing apart from the books, the movie is good. Darn good. It is well worth at least two viewings. And, I think, the more it's viewed, the better it gets.
- MonDePlume
- 19 oct. 2004
- Lien permanent
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 11 300 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 5 301 539 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 1 500 000 $ US
- 15 févr. 1982
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 5 301 539 $ US
- Durée2 heures
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant