Un milliardaire offre un million de dollars à un couple marié pour une nuit avec la jeune femme.Un milliardaire offre un million de dollars à un couple marié pour une nuit avec la jeune femme.Un milliardaire offre un million de dollars à un couple marié pour une nuit avec la jeune femme.
- Réalisation
- Scénaristes
- Vedettes
- Prix
- 7 victoires et 8 nominations au total
6,084.8K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Avis en vedette
Glossy movie with Demi Moore at the apex of her beauty
Provocative premise receives stylish treatment from director Adrian Lyne; this film has a luxurious, almost sensuous texture, part of which comes from the ultra-glossy cinematography, and part from Demi Moore, who was at the time at the peak of her beauty and at the top of the world in her career (her hairstyle is amazing in this film). Oliver Platt, as the comic relief, gets in some funny lines. But the movie is not all surface - there is plenty of food for discussion in its themes, if one is so inclined. *** out of 4.
Where is James Mason when we need him
Adrian Lyne does what he does beautifully, whatever that is. The gorgeous look of his films hide a serious lack of depth and a rather Machiavellian knack for attracting us, the natives, with shiny pretty things. We fall for it every time, or almost, we couldn't swallow Lolita, oh no, he should have left Lolita alone and shouldn't have made that outrageous statement, remember? "James Mason was all wrong in Kubrick's version of the Nabokov novel" Do me a favor Mr. Lyne, stick to "Flashdance" and suffer all the way to the bank. Sorry, I lost myself for a moment. Where was I? Oh yes "Inidecent Proposal" Imagine that premise in the hands of someone with serious intentions. A young happy couple and the devil. The stranger who, incapable of bearing goodness and happiness, decides to destroy it. Aware of their needs, he presents a solution to their problems. He doesn't care for her, he cares about their destruction. Juicy stuff. But, although Demi Moore and Woody Harrelson are great as the perfect foil for the devil's designs, the devil is Robert Redford. Mr. Redford is a personal hero of mine, instead of resting in his laurels, Sundance, the environment, Ordinary People, Quiz Show and so on and so on. But, I heard him say in a Charlie Rose interview that he would like to play different characters, dangerous, dark but nobody offered him that kind of part. What about this one Bob? This was a part that could transform this pretty candy floss into a classic. It needed guts. Where was the darkness? I looked into Redford eyes and I saw Redford. I would have gone with him for much less than a million bucks because in spite of the fact that involved accepting an indecent proposal there was no danger, really. He allows himself to be Redford all the way. The indecency is in the title in the gimmick but not in the spirit. As a result none of the promises are fulfilled and we're left with a pretty inconsequential movie. Oh well, I hope Mr Lyne learned his lesson. One never bad mouths James Mason, okay?
Too gentlemanly to be indecent, too sentimental to be much fun
Cotton candy involving a loving couple (bordering on good buddies) who lose their shirts in Las Vegas but get a chance to recoup when a world-famous billionaire makes a play for the wife--with booty attached! Great set-up for a story that takes a slow spiral downward once the couple returns home (to a rather lovely cottage in Southern California). Some sparks from principals Robert Redford and Demi Moore, but Woody Harrelson is out of his league and Adrian Lyne's direction is all visual and nothing much upstairs (and I could've done without the horse-racing video suddenly morphing into a shot of Demi in "the act"). The film is shamefully enjoyable, and capped with teen-romance fever, but aren't these characters a little old for moony-eyed puppy love? ** from ****
OK but unrealistic
I'm only writing a review to share the humorist Erma Bombeck's observation.
In one of her last columns before her passing, she mentioned that she and her husband had gone to see this movie.
As they were driving home, her husband asked "Well? Would you?" "Would I what?" she asked.
"Would you sleep with Robert Redford for a million dollars?" "It depends," she said.
Her husband was shocked. "DEPENDS?" he choked. "Depends on WHAT?" "Depends on whether he'd let me make monthly payments..." she replied.
I passed root beer through my nose when I read that - had to share.
In one of her last columns before her passing, she mentioned that she and her husband had gone to see this movie.
As they were driving home, her husband asked "Well? Would you?" "Would I what?" she asked.
"Would you sleep with Robert Redford for a million dollars?" "It depends," she said.
Her husband was shocked. "DEPENDS?" he choked. "Depends on WHAT?" "Depends on whether he'd let me make monthly payments..." she replied.
I passed root beer through my nose when I read that - had to share.
"If you want something very badly, set it free. If it comes back to you, it's yours forever. If it doesn't, it was never yours to begin with."
Terribly underrated movie. Although the basic premise is somewhat unrealistic, consequences are something many couples, if not the majority of them, can relate to. Almost everyone at least once had essentially similar situation, regardless of the fact that specific circumstances were different. If nothing else, Woody, Demi, and Robert are enough reason to see this film.
8/10
8/10
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesDirector Adrian Lyne and Demi Moore often fought on-set over her character, with Woody Harrelson trying to be mediator between the two. Lyne had argued that he wanted Moore to show vulnerability, while the actress defended herself. It was later while Lyne was editing this movie that he realized she was portraying what he wanted all along, and he soon apologized to Moore.
- GaffesWhen David uses a Gryphon match to light the stove, the camera and two crew members are reflected in the kettle.
- Bandes originalesYou Light Up My Life
By Joseph Brooks (as Joe Brooks)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Indecent Proposal?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Indecent Proposal
- Lieux de tournage
- société de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 38 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 106 614 059 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 18 387 632 $ US
- 11 avr. 1993
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 266 614 059 $ US
- Durée
- 1h 57m(117 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant







