ÉVALUATION IMDb
4,7/10
51 k
MA NOTE
Cette fois, un nouveau bébé arrive, et c'est une fille. Enveloppé avec le conflit standard entre mère et père, Mikey s'engage dans une petite rivalité fraternelle avec sa nouvelle soeur.Cette fois, un nouveau bébé arrive, et c'est une fille. Enveloppé avec le conflit standard entre mère et père, Mikey s'engage dans une petite rivalité fraternelle avec sa nouvelle soeur.Cette fois, un nouveau bébé arrive, et c'est une fille. Enveloppé avec le conflit standard entre mère et père, Mikey s'engage dans une petite rivalité fraternelle avec sa nouvelle soeur.
- Réalisation
- Scénaristes
- Vedettes
- Prix
- 3 nominations au total
Bruce Willis
- Mikey
- (voice)
Roseanne Barr
- Julie
- (voice)
Damon Wayans
- Eddie
- (voice)
Mel Brooks
- Mr. Toilet Man
- (voice)
4,750.5K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Avis en vedette
Bland, and too full of poopoo jokes
This was an inevitable sequel, that was really not all that of a movie. It was charming at most, but too many poopoo jokes, and other ridiculous stuff. I give it sequel: 4.5 out of 10. Rated PG-13 for crude humor, thematic elements, and language.
Hilarious
i don't care what anyone says this movie is hilarious. Roseanne as the voice of the baby was perfect. she even looked like her! John Travolta and Kirstie Alley work well in all three of the look who's talking movies. When it came on T.V. it had at least 20 minutes of edited stuff which i don't know why they took out. The one problem i had was with not having Mikey talk. The kid is old enough to talk unlike the baby, so why didn't they just have him talk? Otherwise that it was hilarious!
Why didn't they let the children talk?
I was disappointed with this movie. Not that I don't like this kind of comedy, I loved the first one, but this just doesn't live up to that.
It's not the kids' fault though. Mikey is still a cutie, and he's got some good jokes, although I don't get the speaking arrangement - he says a word or two himself, and then it suddenly switches to the male voice. I think they should have chosen either or. This was just annoying.
Roseanne as the voice of little Julie is GREAT, and there are some really good parts with her(like the visit to the doctor). But where is she for most of the movie? There is so much of the parents fighting and problems with the goofy brother-in-law that it seems the kids take a second seat in this film. I was bored at times with the long fighting scenes. They were neither interesting nor funny. The pregnancy was fast-forwarded through - I suppose they had no more ideas for it after the first movie - and Mikey's jealousy for his sister gets less attention than the potty training(which is far less interesting). The burglar story is too unbelievable to be funny. And the "music video" parts are weird - why are there so many songs? the Elvis impersonation is pretty cool(by John Travolta), but the rest of the "classic pop songs" should have been left out.
There are some really cute sister-brother scenes, but this movie could have been so much better, funnier, and more interesting if they had let the kids play the main role. Now it's pretty disappointing. Some good laughs, but not enough to save the movie. I give it a 5 out of 10.
It's not the kids' fault though. Mikey is still a cutie, and he's got some good jokes, although I don't get the speaking arrangement - he says a word or two himself, and then it suddenly switches to the male voice. I think they should have chosen either or. This was just annoying.
Roseanne as the voice of little Julie is GREAT, and there are some really good parts with her(like the visit to the doctor). But where is she for most of the movie? There is so much of the parents fighting and problems with the goofy brother-in-law that it seems the kids take a second seat in this film. I was bored at times with the long fighting scenes. They were neither interesting nor funny. The pregnancy was fast-forwarded through - I suppose they had no more ideas for it after the first movie - and Mikey's jealousy for his sister gets less attention than the potty training(which is far less interesting). The burglar story is too unbelievable to be funny. And the "music video" parts are weird - why are there so many songs? the Elvis impersonation is pretty cool(by John Travolta), but the rest of the "classic pop songs" should have been left out.
There are some really cute sister-brother scenes, but this movie could have been so much better, funnier, and more interesting if they had let the kids play the main role. Now it's pretty disappointing. Some good laughs, but not enough to save the movie. I give it a 5 out of 10.
Bland and lacklustre
The main problem with this sequel is that it is a very lacklustre retread of the much superior first movie. Now I don't mind more-of-the same-sequels, Home Alone 2 is one of the best and most underrated sequels out there in my opinion and that is often criticised for being too much like the first film.
Starting with the good things, the cameos from Damon Wayons and Mel Brooks are amusing, same with Bruce Willis and Roseanne Barr and I liked John Travolta's dance number. Plus the soundtrack was good and the film was nice to look at. However, it is incredibly predictable in the story and the script is very weak, I do agree there are too many poopoo jokes. The direction is bland and the sentimentality well and truly gets in the way.
Overall, disappointing and bland. 4/10 Bethany Cox
Starting with the good things, the cameos from Damon Wayons and Mel Brooks are amusing, same with Bruce Willis and Roseanne Barr and I liked John Travolta's dance number. Plus the soundtrack was good and the film was nice to look at. However, it is incredibly predictable in the story and the script is very weak, I do agree there are too many poopoo jokes. The direction is bland and the sentimentality well and truly gets in the way.
Overall, disappointing and bland. 4/10 Bethany Cox
That Roseanne!
The sequal to Look who's talking never has and never will be better than the first. But the only thing that makes the movie stand out, is the comedy and wit of Roseanne. She has all the funny jokes, she's cuter than what is now the baby Mikey, and she also tells what a baby might REALLY think. This movie should only be for Roseanne fans.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe Learjet featured in the movie was owned by John Travolta at the time the movie was made. Tail number N254JT. JT = John Travolta.
- GaffesWhen Mollie and James are having an argument in the hallway in front of their apartment, the door to their apartment is sometimes ajar, sometimes wide open.
- Citations
Mollie Ubriacco: Mommy is a girl, so I don't have a penis.
James Ubriacco: But she's got some set of balls.
Mollie Ubriacco: But Daddy is a big...
Mikey: Penis!
- Générique farfeluAt the beginning, the Tri-Star Pictures horse is talking about running and when he starts to fly he says "I have wings! Tri-Star Pictures - Anything can happen!". Later in the film the same Tri-Star Pictures theme is used.
- Autres versionsThe UK cinema version was cut by the BBFC to remove the line "Why don't you put me in a fucking dress?". The cut was restored to all later releases.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Troldspejlet: Episode #4.5 (1991)
- Bandes originalesAll Shook Up
Written by Otis Blackwell & Elvis Presley
Performed by Elvis Presley
Courtesy of RCA Records
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Look Who's Talking Too
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 47 789 074 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 8 100 640 $ US
- 16 déc. 1990
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 47 789 074 $ US
- Durée
- 1h 21m(81 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant






