The Scarlet Tunic

The Scarlet Tunic strongest point is the quality of the photography particularly in the use of colour and light. The spectacular scenery of the Wessex and Dorset coast provides natural beauty but other scenes using light in a unique way are key to the film's overall effect. The setting in the army camp comes to life completely through the use of superb light and shadows. Another example is the dramatic use of the scarlet tunic itself. The scene with the bright red garment lying on the beach creates a vivid and heart rendering moment. The story is one of a tragic romance, which is made even stronger by the quality of the visuals. Some of the acting is excellent with the two lead characters strong. My only negative feeling about this film was some of the characters are over acted and tend to distract from the overall quality of the film with the most objectionable being the Army captain.

I think this is a great example of why the British are so good at romances. A powerful story, great acting and beautifully shot in the English countryside - if you want to see some of Britain's best scenery then buy this film. But it's much more than that Jean Marc-Barr smoulders as the soldier who falls in love with the betrothed English rose (Emma Fielding) and their forbidden love forms the basis of this enjoyable but melancholy story. A strong cast and a good script make this a thoroughly enjoyable movie, particularly when you consider it was made on a budget that many other movies spend on catering. Forget the snide comments, this is a wholesome family film, which you can watch over and over again - it's got everything. One of the best undiscovered British romances around. Strongly recommended.

Being very familiar with the area in which the film was shot, we empathised immediately with the settings. Having also had military connections the period uniforms interested us and we scrutinised every detail we could!(The position of the double V ranking stripes - which were ripped off, seemed to change position on the sleeve from time to time.) Firstly we enjoyed the movie enormously, even though neither of us had heard of the novel. The big names surprised us for such a modest production. The feeling of the pace of life was perfectly conveyed along with the simplicity of love and death in those times. Timing and opportunities were snatched at and acts of passion were colourfully acted out. The housekeeper and master relationship unfolded so naturally. The relationship which bore a love child girl, resulted in a family reunion at the end of the film - a relationship which the deceased hero and heroine had contrived to create. The film was a tragedy and it was in our opinion extremely well casted, the filming locations were of course perfect and authentic, costume and hair was good and the lighting we noticed brought the audience a little closer to actually being there. (Lighting is not something we comment on usually!) Make up was good as it should not have been visible in this piece, for this period or for these country folk. The death scene was "short lived"! It all happened so fast, which was a pity - more could have been made of this scene. But it was true love I guess. Thought there wasn't enough anger in this scene by the father.

Believe it was a well budgeted film, and looking at the credits used local help too. More please.

Even actors as talented as Emma Fielding and Simon Callow could not save this one. These actors will put this one behind them and go on to greater accomplishments. I am impressed that they chose art over commercialism in this effort, and most especially with their faith in the material. But it was clear that the direction and editing left a great deal to be desired. My sense is that the best part of this effort was probably left on the cutting-room floor. One disappointing film does not break a career.

A beautiful film that deserves to be seen more often, and it does deserve a higher rating than the 5.3 it has as of now(lack of votes perhaps?). There are a couple of moments of rushed editing and Simon Callow is in over-acting scenery-chewing mode that can feel at odds with the tone of the rest of the film. The Wessex/Dorset scenery is simply exquisite though and matches Hardy's vivid writing almost exactly, and the photography is not just lovely to look at but allows us to take in the scenery and atmosphere without feeling stolid TV movie quality. The period detail is evocatively rendered- not too clean and not too bleak either- with good make-up and no obviously anachronistic-looking hair-styles, and the lighting is careful not to be too bright or too murky. The simple tranquillity of the music score also appeals, and when the drama should resonate it does wisely take a back-seat, as do the very literate and thoughtfully adapted script that is in keeping with Hardy's prose and the simple but very charming and touchingly melancholic story. The characters don't feel like caricatures and you do genuinely believe in the two protagonists' love for one another. Jean-Marc Barr is a charming and handsome Matthaus, and Emma Fielding is English-Rose-personified. In fact the acting is very well done, though with some reservations on Callow's part. Much of the direction is slick and sympathetic too. So all in all, a very good and beautiful film that doesn't disgrace Hardy or the story in the slightest. It's not 100% perfect, but it is much better than the rating makes it out to be. 8/10 Bethany Cox