Une expédition de spéléologie tourne vraiment mal lorsque les explorateurs sont piégés et poursuivis par une étrange race de prédateurs.Une expédition de spéléologie tourne vraiment mal lorsque les explorateurs sont piégés et poursuivis par une étrange race de prédateurs.Une expédition de spéléologie tourne vraiment mal lorsque les explorateurs sont piégés et poursuivis par une étrange race de prédateurs.
- Réalisation
- Scénariste
- Vedettes
- Prix
- 8 victoires et 22 nominations au total
Stephen Lamb
- Crawler
- (as Steve Lamb)
7,2267.6K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Avis en vedette
Good gore movie
An interesting and differentiated horror movie in the "gore" style. It is above average for the genre. It started slowly, but after half it became interesting, maintaining a tense atmosphere, a little frightening and claustrophobic. The atmosphere is good. It can be divided into two parts: before and after the cave. You sit on the armchair during the exhibition with that feeling of agony and distress. It escapes from the usual clichés to the genre, having an unconventional and surprising ending. There are some logic flaws in the plot and the characters, but nothing that compromises the story. The curiosity is to see the cast practically all feminine. It's worth as entertainment. I recommend it to all lovers of horror art.
A little overrated
The Descent is, in my opinion, an overrated horror film. It does a great job building tension, and the underground cave setting adds a strong sense of claustrophobia and anxiety that really works. But beyond that, it feels a bit too generic. Most of the plot points are predictable well in advance, and that kills a lot of the suspense. Even the ending feels flat and expected. For a horror film, being this easy to anticipate is a big flaw. It's not bad - it's well shot and has a solid atmosphere - but it just doesn't bring anything fresh or truly terrifying to the table.
Unsettling
The Descent is a film that plays with the theme of claustrophobia. Effective usage of lighting. I am pleasantly shocked by how well orchestrated this film is.
One of the greatest British horrors ever made.
Focusing on the fear of claustrophobia with the simple dread of the unknown, The Descent puts likable characters in frightening situations. As a horror fanatic, this film floats at the top of my list of best scary films in recent years. The setup feels like it moves quickly and seamlessly into the main storyline, but that's because it's so beautifully shot, well-acted, and scripted so that we know and care enough about the characters to worry once they belay down into the dark cave. This character knowledge carries weight throughout the movie, as the group variously splinters and works together to escape. Shocks and jolts start before the central scare appears. And props to an all-woman cast that feels totally natural and not slapped together to achieve cheap feminist self-congratulations. Well-acted and atmospheric, I recommend this movie to anyone wanting to see a solid, scary horror movie that doesn't reinvent the genre, but definitely strays from the norm.
Architectural Darkness
Regular readers of my comments know I am interested in cinematic architecture.
There's built space of course, but much cooler is when a filmmaker deals with the non-physical: architectural fire or water. Smoke.
And then there's perhaps the hardest of them, architectural darkness. Form of the formless, containment by absence, the pressing in of the absence of light.
"Ghosts of Mars" did a bit of it, poorly, and it is exceedingly rare overall. That's why I celebrate any attempt. This isn't great, but it has some competence and lessons.
If you don't know this little film, it has a long setup period where we have a group of young women not girls, surely who arrange to be stranded in a cavern with a threat.
There are monsters but the threat is the dark. This isn't terrific cinematic engineering, that part all seems to be hit and miss. But it does have terrific pacing overall and that attention to pacing extends to the use of darkness and the various lighting devices they have at their disposal.
Much use is made of the point of view nature of the lighting: flashlights and cameras and even after they are gone much of the blocking uses those sensibilities. Its a subtle fold, but so very effective. It makes us see what these women do and joins us to them in terror.
There's an effective plot device that pings off this. One of our women has visions, which we follow until we have our legs pulled out from us and her. The ending has one of these two endings where we aren't quite sure which is real and which imagined. The idea that both are true is the most unsettling.
Ted's Evaluation -- 3 of 3: Worth watching.
There's built space of course, but much cooler is when a filmmaker deals with the non-physical: architectural fire or water. Smoke.
And then there's perhaps the hardest of them, architectural darkness. Form of the formless, containment by absence, the pressing in of the absence of light.
"Ghosts of Mars" did a bit of it, poorly, and it is exceedingly rare overall. That's why I celebrate any attempt. This isn't great, but it has some competence and lessons.
If you don't know this little film, it has a long setup period where we have a group of young women not girls, surely who arrange to be stranded in a cavern with a threat.
There are monsters but the threat is the dark. This isn't terrific cinematic engineering, that part all seems to be hit and miss. But it does have terrific pacing overall and that attention to pacing extends to the use of darkness and the various lighting devices they have at their disposal.
Much use is made of the point of view nature of the lighting: flashlights and cameras and even after they are gone much of the blocking uses those sensibilities. Its a subtle fold, but so very effective. It makes us see what these women do and joins us to them in terror.
There's an effective plot device that pings off this. One of our women has visions, which we follow until we have our legs pulled out from us and her. The ending has one of these two endings where we aren't quite sure which is real and which imagined. The idea that both are true is the most unsettling.
Ted's Evaluation -- 3 of 3: Worth watching.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesTwenty-one separate cave sets were built for the film. These were carefully reused with different camera angles, set dressing and lighting to suggest a nearly endless collection of interconnected tunnels and caverns. For realism, the makers often limited the lighting of the sets to light sources that the protagonists brought with them, such as flashlights, helmet lights and light sticks.
- GaffesAll of the spines in the various bone piles throughout the movie have the spines intact and the inter vertebral disks still present in the spines. Inter vertebral disks, however, are cartilage, not bone, and would have decayed (especially given that there is no clothing, hair, or fur in the bone piles, meaning that the bones are quite old). The spine segments should be scattered and in pieces, not in long segments.
- Générique farfeluThe creature's snarling sound can be heard at the end of the credits.
- Autres versionsSPOILER: The endings of the US and European versions differ. In the end, Sarah wakes up at the bottom of the cave, crawls out, and makes her way back to the car. When she is driving away, she pulls over and vomits, and when she leans back into the car, she is startled by the ghost of Juno sitting in the passenger seat. The US version cuts to the credits here. In the European version, this apparition causes Sarah to wake up for real at the bottom of the cave, revealing her escape to be just a dream. She then has a vision of her daughter's birthday cake, which we see is just her torch. The camera backs out, the voices of the creatures can be heard again and are increasing in strength as they are closing in on her, and the movie ends. This ending was considered "too dark" for US audiences.
- ConnexionsEdited into The Descent: Deleted and Extended Scenes (2006)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- The Descent
- Lieux de tournage
- Perth and Kinross, Écosse, Royaume-Uni(on location)
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 3 500 000 £ (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 26 024 456 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 8 911 330 $ US
- 6 août 2006
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 57 222 311 $ US
- Durée
- 1h 39m(99 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant






