Dragons' Den

This is a very good show. People coming to get investors for their business's. There is negatives. 1. Jenny She has hardly made any investments so what is the point of her staying a dragon. 2. What's the point of the presenter, the show wastes money on a presenter that doesn't need to be on their

Unlike The Apprentice, the Dragons have moved on in the internet world of Influences. Alan Sugar has not, he doesn't even know what an influencer is, insists on suit, (who wears a tie nowerdays? I would go on in ripped jeans, converse all-stars and a Pixies t shirt just to wind him up!) Occasionally we get a good deal, the dragons fighting each other. My question would be, if this show has been going for 20 years, how many companies, looking for support do they have now, hundreds? They must be spreading themselves very thinly, even just through one series. I suspect they are palmed-off to other staff once the deal is made, because there is no way the dragons could manage all the companies the have a stake in.

We are hardly ever told about how these companies are performing 1,5,10 years on. Reggae Reggae sauce by Levi Roots is probably the only one I remember- because I see it in the supermarket.

They could do with a companion show +5 years to see how each company progressed with honest feedback as to the support they received.

They are lowballed into giving away huge shares of their company, did they do it, did they escape the Dragons, did they fail? How was their experience once they got in the lift, the adrenaline had worn off and they realised they have sold their soul.

Thoroughly enjoyed it. I've just started watching from season 19 onwards. Was into shark tank for a couple of months saw a DD clip on YT; Peter jones was on a whole other level compared to the sharks; switched to DD after that. Peter Jones, Deborah Meadon, Duncan Bannatyne are truly dragons on the show. Like the 3 dragons from GOT.

Totally savage and ruthless. The entrepreneurs get a thorough roasting from the dragons though some escape with a light grilling and some get the dream investor/s they were hoping for. Brilliant in terms of entertainment plus you get insight into the business world. Very interesting to watch. British dry humour at its best 👍💯

There is drastic change from season 1 to 19 in the setting, dragons attitude and demeanor, humour and of course the dragons themselves (with the exception of den legends Deborah Meadon and Peter Jones). The dragon savagery has gone down sadly but there's a nice vibe on the den.

Season 19 has a great lineup of dragons. There's 2 younger dragons Sara davies and Steven Bartlett who bring a fresh perspective to the show. Theres the older more experienced dragons like Deborah Meadon, Touker Suleiman, Peter Jones all who are well established in the business world with diverse portfolios and rolling in cash. Experience of decades combined with new perspective and ideas.... The perfect combination for a good business.

A word of advice if you're just watching clips on YT know that each pitch takes nearly 1.5 hours to film, so many parts are edited out.

Of course it is flawed, some of the business propositions are ludicrous, and there have been times when the narration has become extremely annoying. Still, Dragon's Den is very interesting to watch. I like the fact that the dragons are straight talking and know what they're talking about, and as a presenter, Evan Davis does have a certain likability about him when he is not annoying that is. Over the years, we have been treated to a number of great inventions, and some hilariously ludicrous ones too. It is also very interesting learning more about how a business is run and all that.

All in all, a perfectly watchable reality show, of course with flaws, but very interesting. 8/10 Bethany Cox

Dragon's Den is a welcome relief in the constant scheduling of the usual type of reality show where people generally people sit around whining and/or swearing for no apparent purpose. The idea is that contestants come to a panel of five 'dragons' (highly successful business people) with a project or concept that they hope to get some investment in. The programme focuses on the business pitch and the reaction of the 'dragons'. It is a strong concept, offering an insight into the way that companies start up and hopefully encourages talented individuals into taking the plunge and setting up for themselves, a class of people that the UK lacks at the moment.

However it keeps in the cruelty that the British are so fond of (how else could someone like Simon Cowell become so popular?). Much of the berating is deserved as some contenders try to get hundreds of thousands of pounds for a small fraction of their tiny company whilst being completely clueless about such simple things as their turnover or net profit, but it often comes across as arrogant rich people ridiculing the dreams of ambitious entrepreneurs. The ridiculous nature of some of the products suggests that either screening applicants was limited or they were let through just for the dubious entertainment value of 'the Dragons' making fun of them. The comments are often unnecessarily barbed instead of constructive, and while this is defended as 'cruel to be kind' frequently it sounds more like the panel are trying to outdo each other to get themselves on the trailer. Some of the panel appear a lot more helpful than others, like Richard Farleigh who usually had some good advice for the contestants who were unsuccessful, while Theo Paphitis comes across as the most shrewd of the bunch.

Apparently Peter Jones is leaving which is not much of a loss as recently he has seemed more interested in boosting his ego and trying to be funny than investing - shame he is about as amusing as a documentary about the Holocaust. Lately also the panel seems to be extremely cautious, almost always refusing to take on a project by themselves, instead trying to get a partnership with another Dragon, which takes away from their supposedly bold entrepreneurial nature. The programme has also declined in quality recently due to the editing which allows you to predict which ideas will get investment by the running order and removes most of the tension. The annoyingly insistent commentary by Evan Davis repeating the rules of show and everything that has just gone on in the show also detracts from the viewer's enjoyment.