Un groupe de personnes témoigne d'une agression mortelle sans intervenir. Toutes ces personnes sont ciblées par quelqu'un, ou plutôt quelque chose, qui cherche à se venger.Un groupe de personnes témoigne d'une agression mortelle sans intervenir. Toutes ces personnes sont ciblées par quelqu'un, ou plutôt quelque chose, qui cherche à se venger.Un groupe de personnes témoigne d'une agression mortelle sans intervenir. Toutes ces personnes sont ciblées par quelqu'un, ou plutôt quelque chose, qui cherche à se venger.
Avis en vedette
Started off reasonably well but gradually descended into farce with some truly dreadful acting with no suspense, zero scares or anything remotely new or interesting to see and utilizing some of the writing of Final Destination rather than come up with something fresh and new it plays out like a made for tv wet Sunday afternoon movie.
Writer and director Jeffrey Reddick wrote the Final Destination series - they say we all have one book in us all so I guess that was his but this one is a dud!
Writer and director Jeffrey Reddick wrote the Final Destination series - they say we all have one book in us all so I guess that was his but this one is a dud!
This film highlights some pertinent issues, such as the fact that we do not help others when they are in situations of difficulty, even violence. Our morbid interest in the violence that happens to others. around us. how to overcome mourning. Strange dreams and events surround Caitlin, our heroine, hallucinations of all kinds that make her unreliable in the eyes of the authorities. Another multiracial couple is fashionable, but nothing against it. some similarities, of tenuous ideas with final Destination, here or there. There is a twist in the film but very poorly designed. As in the thrillers of lifetime, a terrible disappointment. No spoilers, Thriller is watchable although only once. promising start that degrades the end of time, both the script and the performance of the actors, the direction is average.NOT AN HORROR MOVIE AT ALL a Thriller.
This film had a lot of potential and had some really nice ideas running through it. Unfortunately those ideas got lost in translation, paired with some terrible acting, resulted in a rollercoaster of a movie in terms of highs and lows. I love that they used such a current problem right now (people filming things instead of helping) and turned it into a horror movie. I really liked the premise and what the movie aspired to be. The main actress wasn't talented enough to pull this off, I found her quite jarring. And she was 'supported' by an even worst cast. The two revelations at the end were pretty decent; the final revelation a pleasant surprise. It's just a shame most of the characters had zero depth.
Honestly I liked this one, the subject was interesting and it was different but... the last act when everything is reveal just destroyed what happened before and turned the film from a good " you reap what you sow" concept to a petty revenge film.
Too bad without this it would have been a 7/10, but because of this I'm force to go with a 5.
Too bad without this it would have been a 7/10, but because of this I'm force to go with a 5.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesJeremy Holm (Detective Boyd) was a frequent actor on Primetime: What Would You Do? (2009), a hidden camera show where staged scenarios are acted out in public in order to see who steps in to help. This is uncannily similar to the plot/theme of this movie.
- Bandes originalesHost
written by Jammes Luckett
performed by Thrillharmonik
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Don't Look Back?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 30 780 $ US
- Durée
- 1h 30m(90 min)
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant