The Boy Behind the Door
- 2020
- 1h 28m
ÉVALUATION IMDb
5,7/10
6,4 k
MA NOTE
Bobby et son meilleur ami Kevin sont kidnappés et emmenés dans une étrange maison éloignée, cependant Bobby parvient à s'échapper. Il entend les cris de Kevin et se rend compte qu'il ne peut... Tout lireBobby et son meilleur ami Kevin sont kidnappés et emmenés dans une étrange maison éloignée, cependant Bobby parvient à s'échapper. Il entend les cris de Kevin et se rend compte qu'il ne peut pas laisser son ami derrière lui.Bobby et son meilleur ami Kevin sont kidnappés et emmenés dans une étrange maison éloignée, cependant Bobby parvient à s'échapper. Il entend les cris de Kevin et se rend compte qu'il ne peut pas laisser son ami derrière lui.
- Directors
- Writers
- Stars
- Prix
- 2 victoires et 2 nominations au total
Avis en vedette
The major component of what I enjoyed about the film is the dynamic and poignant performances of the child actors in the film. However, my general feelings of the film's story progression is one of frustration and eye rolls.
I do realize that film's protagonist is a child so poorly thought out action makes sense. Child characters can't be presumed to have the most logical survival instincts. Still, I felt more irritation toward the antagonist or general logistics of the occurrences in the film.
Still, I definitely give it kudos for both taking on a dark real life subject as well as the actors performances.
I do realize that film's protagonist is a child so poorly thought out action makes sense. Child characters can't be presumed to have the most logical survival instincts. Still, I felt more irritation toward the antagonist or general logistics of the occurrences in the film.
Still, I definitely give it kudos for both taking on a dark real life subject as well as the actors performances.
I can't even get into it. Starts off interesting but soon delves into pubes on a bar of soap. Really tried to enjoy it but so full of bad writing, continuity errors and becomes very generic half way though
Just nonsense.
On the other hand though I've ordered a Chinese takeaway bit I don't know what any of the food names mean so it's a gamble as to what I'm going to get.
Just nonsense.
On the other hand though I've ordered a Chinese takeaway bit I don't know what any of the food names mean so it's a gamble as to what I'm going to get.
The kids were decent actors and the beginning was quite scary. It's terrifying how badly kidnapping and assaulting, abusing and killing of children as become an epidemic today. Sad that your kid can't even play in their own yard without fear of a predator taking them, and the internet lets them right into your home now too! :O Why can't we figure out a way to use technology to protect kids instead of putting them in More Danger??? And as for the reviewer saying its Democrats that traffic kids, You know what?? Political affiliation has NOTHING to DO with whether your an EVIL CREEP or NOT. People of all ages, races, incomes, political affiliations, religions, genders Can choose to be EViL MONSTERS, so stop already with your misinformation PLEASE!!!
Now do characters here (and kids furthermore) act and do stuff that you would deem ... not helpful to their situation? You bet they do. Is it the old and established, well if they did everything right, we wouldn't have a movie kind of thing? Maybe in some cases yes, maybe you feel in most cases too.
But having said that, the actors (kids - which I can't stress out enough are not easy to find - well not good actor kids like the ones you get here at least) are really not to blame for anything here - if you actually don't like the movie that is.
If like me you buy into the story and suspend your disbelief, you'll have quite the ride. A well choreographed and well shot one at that. For an independent production with a limited plot and time - that is all I ask for.
But having said that, the actors (kids - which I can't stress out enough are not easy to find - well not good actor kids like the ones you get here at least) are really not to blame for anything here - if you actually don't like the movie that is.
If like me you buy into the story and suspend your disbelief, you'll have quite the ride. A well choreographed and well shot one at that. For an independent production with a limited plot and time - that is all I ask for.
At the end of the day, I anticipated something akin to the film "Don't Breathe". A film which immediately grabbed my attention, and I thought it would be filled with surprises and brutal tension.
Trying to be as unbiased as possible, I sought an edge-of-my-seat experience, one that would keep my heart pounding and my grip tight as I cheered on survival at every turn, unfortunately, the film kept me shifting in my seat feeling very little emotion.
I found The Boy Behind the Door lacking in both suspense and tension, as well as in character depth. There was the occasional jump scare, and the first twenty-five minutes was reasonable appealing. However, the storyline was linear and cliché. When I become engrossed in a film, it's the background sounds, the eerie drawn-out suspense, and the sheer tense nature of impending events that captivate me.
However, the film never really shifts from third gear, it looks and feels very low budget. Even when Bobby (played by Lonnie Davis) locks himself in the bathroom, and we hear footsteps behind the door, it doesn't create the same heart-pounding scenario as "Don't Breathe", but rather feels like a weary attempt to build a similar but less effective atmosphere.
One aspect that truly bothers me is that at 12 years old, I had watched my fair share of horror films. Some were utterly terrifying. In my mind, I always came back to the same opinion: if ever in such a situation, given the chance, I would continuously defend myself, ensuring the abductor or villain is completely incapacitated.
Unfortunately, in The Boy Behind the Door, there are a few extremely imprudent moments where the boy attacks the enemy, only to drop the weapon in their vicinity while they are dazed or disoriented, clearly implying they will return for retribution, making is a spectacular facepalm moment of sheer stupidity.
The film itself is rather timid. It lacks crucial horror elements, but its strength lies in its depiction of abduction and what many people thankfully don't tend to see or hear in the darkness and horrors of our world about child abduction.
On a more positive note, although there aren't many to mention, Lonnie delivered a solid performance. He was emotionally invested, and his ability to remain silent for large periods of the film showcased his versatility, emotional depth, innocence, and believability. Another noteworthy performance came from Kristen Bauer (Miss Burton). I couldn't help but draw parallels to her role as 'Pam' in 'True Blood' as the similarities were striking.
The themes of abduction, friendships, innocence, gender, race, and evil were prominently presented; however, character depth and background were what I believed to be one of the film's major flaws. The kidnapping happened early and suddenly that it would have been better to build a solid foundation before the real horrors began.
I must say, Rotten Tomatoes has lost a significant amount of credibility, and dropped the ball by rating this at 97% "Certified Fresh". I would trust the IMDb rating of 5.7-6 as far more accurate reading.
This was the fist film I have seen from Shudder, and while the service has potential to unleash something fresh and gruesome, after this film it tends to fall into the Blumhouse hit and miss category.
Overall, I am disappointed and had expected much more. It's not a terrible film by any stretch, but The Boy Behind the Door is not one I'll look back on too fondly either.
5/10.
Trying to be as unbiased as possible, I sought an edge-of-my-seat experience, one that would keep my heart pounding and my grip tight as I cheered on survival at every turn, unfortunately, the film kept me shifting in my seat feeling very little emotion.
I found The Boy Behind the Door lacking in both suspense and tension, as well as in character depth. There was the occasional jump scare, and the first twenty-five minutes was reasonable appealing. However, the storyline was linear and cliché. When I become engrossed in a film, it's the background sounds, the eerie drawn-out suspense, and the sheer tense nature of impending events that captivate me.
However, the film never really shifts from third gear, it looks and feels very low budget. Even when Bobby (played by Lonnie Davis) locks himself in the bathroom, and we hear footsteps behind the door, it doesn't create the same heart-pounding scenario as "Don't Breathe", but rather feels like a weary attempt to build a similar but less effective atmosphere.
One aspect that truly bothers me is that at 12 years old, I had watched my fair share of horror films. Some were utterly terrifying. In my mind, I always came back to the same opinion: if ever in such a situation, given the chance, I would continuously defend myself, ensuring the abductor or villain is completely incapacitated.
Unfortunately, in The Boy Behind the Door, there are a few extremely imprudent moments where the boy attacks the enemy, only to drop the weapon in their vicinity while they are dazed or disoriented, clearly implying they will return for retribution, making is a spectacular facepalm moment of sheer stupidity.
The film itself is rather timid. It lacks crucial horror elements, but its strength lies in its depiction of abduction and what many people thankfully don't tend to see or hear in the darkness and horrors of our world about child abduction.
On a more positive note, although there aren't many to mention, Lonnie delivered a solid performance. He was emotionally invested, and his ability to remain silent for large periods of the film showcased his versatility, emotional depth, innocence, and believability. Another noteworthy performance came from Kristen Bauer (Miss Burton). I couldn't help but draw parallels to her role as 'Pam' in 'True Blood' as the similarities were striking.
The themes of abduction, friendships, innocence, gender, race, and evil were prominently presented; however, character depth and background were what I believed to be one of the film's major flaws. The kidnapping happened early and suddenly that it would have been better to build a solid foundation before the real horrors began.
I must say, Rotten Tomatoes has lost a significant amount of credibility, and dropped the ball by rating this at 97% "Certified Fresh". I would trust the IMDb rating of 5.7-6 as far more accurate reading.
This was the fist film I have seen from Shudder, and while the service has potential to unleash something fresh and gruesome, after this film it tends to fall into the Blumhouse hit and miss category.
Overall, I am disappointed and had expected much more. It's not a terrible film by any stretch, but The Boy Behind the Door is not one I'll look back on too fondly either.
5/10.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe two directors are lifelong friends and look somewhat like grownup versions of the child actors in their film.
- GaffesThe water on the stove starts to boil and it is heard whistling, yet the ordinary kettle does not have a cap or built-in whistle at all.
- ConnexionsFeatures Frankenstein (1931)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Boy Behind the Door?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Ховайся
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 378 469 $ US
- Durée1 heure 28 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was The Boy Behind the Door (2020) officially released in India in English?
Répondre