ÉVALUATION IMDb
4,5/10
5,3 k
MA NOTE
Six étrangers se réveillent piégés dans un champ de maïs sans fin pour découvrir que quelque chose de mystérieux les chasse.Six étrangers se réveillent piégés dans un champ de maïs sans fin pour découvrir que quelque chose de mystérieux les chasse.Six étrangers se réveillent piégés dans un champ de maïs sans fin pour découvrir que quelque chose de mystérieux les chasse.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
Avis en vedette
An interesting and promising idea. Enjoyed the basic puzzle aspect of this at first. There were a few mildly predictable twists, some jump scares but the acting is kinda annoying and bad, the CGI effects laughable, but worst of all is the frustrating and unsatisfying ending that doesn't provide any explanation or answer any questions.
Basically felt like if Cube (1997) or Saw (2004) were set in a cornfield and not as good.
Basically felt like if Cube (1997) or Saw (2004) were set in a cornfield and not as good.
I would probably give it more of a 5 to 6, but I rated higher to compensate for some of the terrible reviews. I actually found it interesting. It reminded me of a dangerous outdoor escape room. The main issue I have with it was the ending. They could have done so much more with it. If you do watch it, be aware that there is one of those hidden final scenes at the end after a few credits. I could tell by some of the reviews that not everyone stayed on and saw it.
Ever seen the Canadian cult sci-fi thriller Cube?
How about Netflix's adaptation if the Stephen King story In The Long Grass?
Well, imagine the story of the first, but the setting of the second. That is what you have here.
And that's it. There's nothing new, nothing imaginative; just "Cube, but in a field".
Don't get me wrong, I wasn't bored at all, but everything just seemed too familiar. But there were other problems.
Some parts where painfully predictable. Others where the most over-played of clichés (the ex-soldier still haunted by how he let his platoon down, anyone?).
At one point, a character makes reference to something they couldn't have known about. It seems like a really clumsy hint that this character is not to be trusted, but it's never followed up, so why include it? Either the film-makers thought it was a clever way of second guessing the audience (it's not, because it makes things even more nonsensical) or they were not aware of their own continuity.
How about the "Impassable door" that totally blocks our heroes, only for one of them very shortly later to pass through (off camera and without any explanation or reference) with no apparent difficulty. Twice!
As I said, despite all the criticisms, I can't claim I wasn't entertained. The pace was good, and the acting largely fine (though a few of the characters were so 2D they would hardly have been missed however well acted).
It's just that, at best, it offered nothing new and, at worst, fell prey to all manner of clichés and plot-contrivences.
How about Netflix's adaptation if the Stephen King story In The Long Grass?
Well, imagine the story of the first, but the setting of the second. That is what you have here.
And that's it. There's nothing new, nothing imaginative; just "Cube, but in a field".
Don't get me wrong, I wasn't bored at all, but everything just seemed too familiar. But there were other problems.
Some parts where painfully predictable. Others where the most over-played of clichés (the ex-soldier still haunted by how he let his platoon down, anyone?).
At one point, a character makes reference to something they couldn't have known about. It seems like a really clumsy hint that this character is not to be trusted, but it's never followed up, so why include it? Either the film-makers thought it was a clever way of second guessing the audience (it's not, because it makes things even more nonsensical) or they were not aware of their own continuity.
How about the "Impassable door" that totally blocks our heroes, only for one of them very shortly later to pass through (off camera and without any explanation or reference) with no apparent difficulty. Twice!
As I said, despite all the criticisms, I can't claim I wasn't entertained. The pace was good, and the acting largely fine (though a few of the characters were so 2D they would hardly have been missed however well acted).
It's just that, at best, it offered nothing new and, at worst, fell prey to all manner of clichés and plot-contrivences.
I actually enjoyed this more than In The Tall Grass, which isn't saying much, but I had read the story that was based on and was disappointed in the film adaptation.
This was more interesting to me and just isn't as bad as a lot of these reviews claim it is, so I felt the need to give my two cents as a counterpoint to all the undeserved negativity. This is no masterpiece, but it kept me entertained and watching till the end.
This was more interesting to me and just isn't as bad as a lot of these reviews claim it is, so I felt the need to give my two cents as a counterpoint to all the undeserved negativity. This is no masterpiece, but it kept me entertained and watching till the end.
I had no idea what this movie was about besides the information from the tv. I decided to give it a try and it wasn't a bad movie by any means. I'm not sure why all the negative reviews, people needed to be more open minded to the fact that everything was shutdown bc if CoVid when this was filmed. Nobody was working let alone making movies I think for the capabilities at the time it's a decent film and it has plenty of potential for a second film. The idea of dropping people off in the middle of nowhere and having them find their way out is definitely not new but the acting was good and there was plenty of mystery left if they wanted to pick things up again.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesActress Elena Juatco said this was one of the first productions to be able to get up and going after the pandemic hit because it was filmed outside and there were only six cast members.
- Générique farfeluThere is a mid-credits scene.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Escape the Field?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- El campo de la muerte
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 1 074 879 $ US
- Durée
- 1h 29m(89 min)
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant