Zee, tueuse redoutée des bas-fonds parisiens, refuse d'éliminer une chanteuse qu'elle a rendue aveugle. Traquée par son mentor et un inspecteur futé, elle se retrouve piégée dans un complot ... Tout lireZee, tueuse redoutée des bas-fonds parisiens, refuse d'éliminer une chanteuse qu'elle a rendue aveugle. Traquée par son mentor et un inspecteur futé, elle se retrouve piégée dans un complot qui la confronte à son passé.Zee, tueuse redoutée des bas-fonds parisiens, refuse d'éliminer une chanteuse qu'elle a rendue aveugle. Traquée par son mentor et un inspecteur futé, elle se retrouve piégée dans un complot qui la confronte à son passé.
- Réalisation
- Scénaristes
- Vedettes
- Prix
- 14 nominations au total
5,715.9K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Avis en vedette
Sleepwalking to Hollywood
I realise that John Woo is an iconic director, mainly because of his run of funky HK triad gunslinger movies, but whoever put this remake together skimped on the screenwriting, and the script. The direction is ok, but with the nagging feeling that the hourly rate there was also well shy of inspirational.
Every cliched character and trite line of dialogue feels disconnected, existing in isolation, awaiting their brief memetime on Tik Tok and Youtube.
Even the action felt kinda perfunctory, like a cheap sequel filmed in a hurry by an inferior production crew, with no sense of pride in their accomplishments. "Two more flash-cut car chases, an MMA ruck in a public space, a slow-mo bullet time shootout, and we're done, chaps".
What it resembles, more than anything, is a low-budget 80s Eurocrime actioner, with a mismatched Euro-cast, and a script straight out of Babelfish, tarted up in post to look vaguely modern. Unfortunately, it ends up looking like a badly animated storyboard.
Every cliched character and trite line of dialogue feels disconnected, existing in isolation, awaiting their brief memetime on Tik Tok and Youtube.
Even the action felt kinda perfunctory, like a cheap sequel filmed in a hurry by an inferior production crew, with no sense of pride in their accomplishments. "Two more flash-cut car chases, an MMA ruck in a public space, a slow-mo bullet time shootout, and we're done, chaps".
What it resembles, more than anything, is a low-budget 80s Eurocrime actioner, with a mismatched Euro-cast, and a script straight out of Babelfish, tarted up in post to look vaguely modern. Unfortunately, it ends up looking like a badly animated storyboard.
Why?
Why John this is just not neccesary, this is simply an excuse to put two charismatic actors kicking assess, this is not a neccesary remake my guy, it's just like the original but without the essentially of that film, you should make a remake one of your American Van Damme movies, those are not good
The crow and now this one, stop remaking solid and classic movies please, you people should remade something like Waterworld or the Travolta alien movie, try to improve bad movies instead of remaking good ones, this is not a good remake and its feels forced and weird sometimes, you can do better ok guys.
The crow and now this one, stop remaking solid and classic movies please, you people should remade something like Waterworld or the Travolta alien movie, try to improve bad movies instead of remaking good ones, this is not a good remake and its feels forced and weird sometimes, you can do better ok guys.
Autogenerated script, predictable, stilted
Hard to believe this is John Woo movie. Perhaps he doesn't care much more about the script and it's all about style and filming and little else. Every cliche is pulled out of movie history, as our hardened killer has mercy on the innocent girl. It was put together to also present the battle of the non non binary lesbians. It's not meant to be a slight on lgbtq people, there was just no reason to have them in there and it is never explained. Some nonsense about the beating of Sam worthington's heart, in his attempt to do an Irish accent.
All the good reviews here are fake. This is a shell of what good films used to be. You seen it all before and just much better done.
All the good reviews here are fake. This is a shell of what good films used to be. You seen it all before and just much better done.
What is it? 1997 again?
I had to stop after 50min where I couldn't take it anymore, I mean it might be for someone but not for me.
John Woo has a style and I respect that! However I'm not sure if I would still have stomach for that in 2024, nearly 30 years after Faceoff.
You might ask how about the story then? Enough to know that a Killer with misplaced conscious caused a lot of civilians to die to avoid one particular civilian to die because she was against killing civilians. I know it's stupid. But that's the main theme, at least up until I said enough is enough. The plot has so many wholes and it looks so fake that even popular faces couldn't save it for me.
Do not waste your precious life with this movie, Mr Woo, please grow up.
John Woo has a style and I respect that! However I'm not sure if I would still have stomach for that in 2024, nearly 30 years after Faceoff.
You might ask how about the story then? Enough to know that a Killer with misplaced conscious caused a lot of civilians to die to avoid one particular civilian to die because she was against killing civilians. I know it's stupid. But that's the main theme, at least up until I said enough is enough. The plot has so many wholes and it looks so fake that even popular faces couldn't save it for me.
Do not waste your precious life with this movie, Mr Woo, please grow up.
So the pigeons are flying again...
I don't know how many action clichés John Woo made and then piled up during his carrier, but I guess a lot. This picture is really like mocking himself. Probably, rather than maybe, he is. Well, it is a remake of his own film, once considered pioneer of modern action movies, but it does nothing original at all. Rather, it delivers basically the same but with much less intensity, commitment and flair. The soul of the original is absent. There is no fire in it, just ember - to say the least. The characters are good but apparently most of them are restricted, blocked even, to show raw emotions (with the exception of Cantona). It is a weak remake, as they usually are.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesFinn's nickname for Z, 'Cushla machree' is an Irish term of endearment that translates to "pulse of (my) heart" or "beat of (my) heart". It is derived from the Irish Gaelic phrase 'cuisle mo chroidhe'; that is often used in Irish folk songs and poetry.
- GaffesA world class killer for hire regularly and repeatedly goes to the same food place.
- Autres versionsIs a remake of "The Killer" (original title: "Dip huet seung hung," 1989), also directed by John Woo.
- ConnexionsReferenced in Film Junk Podcast: Episode 958: The Crow (1994) (2024)
- Bandes originalesLet's Live for Today
Written by Peter Warne (as Michael Julien), Mogol (as Giulio Rapetti Mogol), Norman David Shapiro (as Norman Shapiro)
Produced by Wendy Wang
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Killer?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 30 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 318 618 $ US
- Durée
- 2h 6m(126 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant






