Zog and the Flying Doctors

Are you ready to embrace the magic of helping people around you? Well if so, the short film Zog and the Flying Doctors is the film for you. Be ready to be immersed in this heartwarming short film that will make you smile and laugh. Zog does carry doctors, but he also carries lots of comedic moments that will make you laugh hysterically.

The storyline follows a young woman named Pearl (Patsy Ferran) who wants to be a doctor and help everyone in the world. There is one problem; she is a princess! She doesn't want to be a princess, but is obligated by her father (Rob Brydon). Pearl goes on a life changing journey learning about herself and her passions.

The animation style in this film is exquisite. The background scenery is particularly great and really brings this fairytale to life. The animation department really checked all the boxes when it comes to the background and character design.

This is an outstanding film for younger viewers. The entire plotline supports the idea of helping others and teaches many morals. The main moral is the idea that you can be anything! Don't let anyone hold you back. Follow your dreams.

Zog and the Flying Doctors truly is a magic experience showing off the beauty of animation and heartwarming lessons. I give Zog and the Flying Doctors 5 out of 5 stars and recommend it for ages 2 to 8. This was definitely a highlight of the New York International Children's Film Festival. Reviewed by Jude A., KIDS FIRST!

The first Zog film was excellent. Granted, the Zog book itself was better, but Zog & The Flyikg Doctors film is pretty bad.

The voices are poorly selected (the Lion, the King, the Mermaid, the Unicorn - they all just don't sit quite right).

The narration by Lenny Henry is awful (his "bang, crash, thumps" for example, have zero emphasis - he sounds bored like he just wants to get paid and go home).

There is too much fighting - they have embellished on the story and added in fight scenes that feel out of place, and not ideal for watching with a toddler.

All in all, pretty poor. Stick with the original - the story, and the execution of the film, are leagues above this.

A story as warm as it can be, as heartfelt as it should be, as meaningful as it proves to be...

Enjoyed very much by both young and old!

Zog And The Flying Doctors (2) (2020) -

I was a bit disappointed with this one. Honestly I wasn't much of a fan of its predecessor 'Zog' (2018), but this one just seemed a bit like cashing in on that one's popularity and a tad basic in that it didn't bring anything new.

I don't think that the story was as well developed as it could have been and it wasn't until the second part of it that it really had anything going for it at all. Perhaps it would have been better to show how being a caring person is a good thing, with the Doctors taking on bigger and bigger challenges instead, because the King was a bit overpowering as a character and his message seemed to be louder than the Flying Doctors.

Also, Sir Gadabout might as well have been completely cut from the story for all he did and I assume that was why Kit Harrington didn't come back to voice him again.

Maybe I will watch it again in the future and feel differently, perhaps I was having my period and being a bit grumpy, but as it stands now, I would be unlikely to return to it in any hurry.

433.85/1000.

Essentially Zog 2, the direct continuation from the first movie/book.

Also accurately adapted, but with a bit of additional depth added that the first movie didn't have.

In order to avoid spoilers, the premise is effectily: A stubborn old fool who'd rather choose death than to believe in someone who he should be holding dear.

Zog & co. Solve a series of problems around the unnamed, unexplored world. These characters hardly speak. Their voices are fine, especially if you consider the thousands of voices in our reality.

A dragon and a knight having a fight seems hardly a problem, if anything, a knight is finally being a knight, and the dragon is... well, did you not see the first Zog and it's opening few minutes with what would be the idea of a dragon chomping a human in half?

Both movies have a pleasant musical score and theme.

Visually, it's the same, there's no loss.

I've seen the most Karen of complaints, though. We've got "too much fighting", someone didn't like the unicorn's horn operation (it's a unicorn, not a bicorn), and other such.

I can find myself rewatching both Zog stories in the future, simply because it's pleasant. I just wish they were a bit longer. Despite the title, it simply doesn't have enough Zog in it, while the first movie ended with the similar problem, not enough Zog, the title character. Still, we have to remember it was essentially done for free, a TV film for the holidays.