Une femme de banlieue est traquée par une silhouette menaçante qui rentre chez elle toutes les nuits. Elle n'obtient pas de l'aide de son entourage, alors elle est obligée de prendre les cho... Tout lireUne femme de banlieue est traquée par une silhouette menaçante qui rentre chez elle toutes les nuits. Elle n'obtient pas de l'aide de son entourage, alors elle est obligée de prendre les choses en main.Une femme de banlieue est traquée par une silhouette menaçante qui rentre chez elle toutes les nuits. Elle n'obtient pas de l'aide de son entourage, alors elle est obligée de prendre les choses en main.
- Prix
- 1 nomination au total
Leith M. Burke
- Rob
- (as Leith Burke)
Nikea Gamby-Turner
- Detective
- (as Nikea Gamby Turner)
Avis en vedette
Although this is billed as a thriller/horror film, I'd place it more in the category of Black Mirror or Twilight Zone in that it's a satire about the state of things in the world, told with surreal/absurd elements. For example there were themes of people being disbelieved, while holding to an every-person-for-themselves attitude, further preventing people from getting support. There's much more to it than that (gender and class) so I'm summarizing very briefly.
Other points: Some of the acting was stiff at times but that became an advantage during brief kafkaesque scenes of the protagonist attempting to communicate. With surreal elements, it often comes with the territory in any case. The music was minimal and rather than announcing everything that was about to happen, it left space for the imagination to fill in the blanks, only containing a few themes that repeated, along with a few key visual leitmotifs.
I can see how a person following this as a literal story with a straightforward protagonist might expect things to go differently, but I felt a definite tension leading up to the end, wondering how the director would play out the themes presented in the story. Perhaps intentionally on the part of the director, while I felt sympathy for the main character, I felt even more for a few of the side characters, especially toward the end of the movie.
Overall I enjoyed the movie, found the themes timely, and will look up other movies by this director.
Other points: Some of the acting was stiff at times but that became an advantage during brief kafkaesque scenes of the protagonist attempting to communicate. With surreal elements, it often comes with the territory in any case. The music was minimal and rather than announcing everything that was about to happen, it left space for the imagination to fill in the blanks, only containing a few themes that repeated, along with a few key visual leitmotifs.
I can see how a person following this as a literal story with a straightforward protagonist might expect things to go differently, but I felt a definite tension leading up to the end, wondering how the director would play out the themes presented in the story. Perhaps intentionally on the part of the director, while I felt sympathy for the main character, I felt even more for a few of the side characters, especially toward the end of the movie.
Overall I enjoyed the movie, found the themes timely, and will look up other movies by this director.
1. Poor or non-existent forensics reduced the credibility of the story.
2. Like a poor teacher the storyline does not direct the audience into thinking about the issue of fear, but instead has us asking what's going on. The focus was on knives, hammers, blood on floor, bodies gone.
3. Bodies disappearing opens many interpretations some of which are nonsensical which added to the confusion. Was she hallucinating; a metaphor; ghosts/spirits?
4. The poor response to securing the home & ways of protecting one's self gives us another female victim character as helpless & lacking intelligence.
5. Even the DVDs special feature of production staff audio commentary overlay said nothing about the story itself, but only camera angles, lighting, etc.
2. Like a poor teacher the storyline does not direct the audience into thinking about the issue of fear, but instead has us asking what's going on. The focus was on knives, hammers, blood on floor, bodies gone.
3. Bodies disappearing opens many interpretations some of which are nonsensical which added to the confusion. Was she hallucinating; a metaphor; ghosts/spirits?
4. The poor response to securing the home & ways of protecting one's self gives us another female victim character as helpless & lacking intelligence.
5. Even the DVDs special feature of production staff audio commentary overlay said nothing about the story itself, but only camera angles, lighting, etc.
I dont get all the really bad reviews for this film. It wasnt that bad but it wasn't amazing either just ok. Yes it doesnt explain a lot and yes its a looped plot film but it tries to hard for the deaper meaning than just a typical looped slasher although it probably would have been better if stuck to the loops without the deepness. The acting isnt great and can seem a bit b movie ish at times but they get the job done well enough. It did have potential to be a hell of a lot better but overall it was different from what i expected and i didn't mind that. The direction is the best part of this film. Some good shots and a mellow score with synth elements bring a nice welcomed atmosphere and help set the tone. Its not the best film ever made or the best looped style movie but its worth a watch nonetheless.
The killer mask is cheap. It has little horror effective elements. It is more psychological drama than horror movie. The cool mystery about the loop quickly disappeared. It was hard to care for the main character. I liked the first 20 minutes, and the last 20 minutes because there was finaly some progress. Didn't like the generalisation it gives about men. If you liked the 2019 version of Black Christmas, may be this one is for you.
Le saviez-vous
- GaffesAt 19:32, when May is talking to Ted's sister Sarah, her iPhone isn't compatible with the case she's using.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Dead Meat Podcast: Interview with Brea Grant (2021)
- Bandes originalesSign of the Times
Written by Hannah Fairlight
Produced by Michael Wagener
Performed by Hannah Fairlight
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Lucky?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Durée
- 1h 23m(83 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant