ÉVALUATION IMDb
7,4/10
15 k
MA NOTE
Réalisatrice nommée aux Oscars, dévoile la négligence et la cupidité à l'origine des crashs de deux Boeing MAX 737 survenus à seulement cinq mois d'intervalle.Réalisatrice nommée aux Oscars, dévoile la négligence et la cupidité à l'origine des crashs de deux Boeing MAX 737 survenus à seulement cinq mois d'intervalle.Réalisatrice nommée aux Oscars, dévoile la négligence et la cupidité à l'origine des crashs de deux Boeing MAX 737 survenus à seulement cinq mois d'intervalle.
- Réalisation
- Scénaristes
- Vedettes
- Prix
- 3 nominations au total
Donald Trump
- Self
- (archive footage)
Lester Holt
- Self
- (archive footage)
Peter Jennings
- Self
- (archive footage)
Maria Bartiromo
- Self
- (archive footage)
Richard Engel
- Self
- (archive footage)
Richard Blumenthal
- Self
- (archive footage)
Elaine Chao
- Self
- (archive footage)
Edward Pierson
- Self
- (archive footage)
John Seigenthaler
- Self
- (archive footage)
Dennis Muilenburg
- Self
- (archive footage)
7,414.5K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Avis en vedette
Airbus instructional video
This documentary should be shown to every new Airbus employee and executive, to learn how you should NOT do it.
Now on a more serious note: An interesting and sometimes even thrilling documentary, which was well-paced, had great interviews and outstanding music. It could've been a bit shorter, but if you like documentaries, it's definitely worth a watch.
Now on a more serious note: An interesting and sometimes even thrilling documentary, which was well-paced, had great interviews and outstanding music. It could've been a bit shorter, but if you like documentaries, it's definitely worth a watch.
Complex story well explained
A complex story well told. Bare faced greed of senior management ends up in deaths. As usual, the worst part is lengths people go to engage in a cover up.
Great documentary
Great documentary, even though I would love more insights into the technical aspects of the issue (fortunately YouTube exists for that. Great content going deep into MCAS).
The only thing that seems strange to me is the way they picture FAA as just another victim. Several stories from the time covered in depth the nuances of their relationship and the leeway FAA provided Boeing in these certification matters. The reluctance of FAA to ground planes is a sign of that. Some even argue this was the FAA acting to protect Boeing commercially instead of caring for US passengers safety.
The only thing that seems strange to me is the way they picture FAA as just another victim. Several stories from the time covered in depth the nuances of their relationship and the leeway FAA provided Boeing in these certification matters. The reluctance of FAA to ground planes is a sign of that. Some even argue this was the FAA acting to protect Boeing commercially instead of caring for US passengers safety.
Government oversight clearly failed passengers in this case.
This movie is good as far as it goes but stops short of illuminating a missing link in the chain of failure that killed hundreds of people. Boeing took a calculated risk and were tragically wrong as far as the 737 Max redesign. Every transportation business faces a cost - benefit analysis in the production of their vehicles, The government is charged with the responsibility of ensuring the safety of these vehicles prior to certifying them for use. In this case the agency responsible is the FAA. It would be safe to assume air travel carries the heaviest burden for any agency other than perhaps the FDA. With this in mind one would think that only the best trained people would be placed in leadership of such an important agency. This is not the case, not even close. Boeing's redesign of the 737 was carried out and certified under the directorship of Michael Huerta at. The FAA. Mr. Huerta's education is listed in Wikipedia as: "Huerta received his bachelor's degree in political science from the University of California, Riverside and his master's in international relations from the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University." If as a casual observer you question how much a political science major knows about the intricacies of the aerospace industry, you hit the core issue. Huerta could easily be called a political appointment without the technical knowledge to lead an agency as vital as the FAA. This type of appointment was neither rare previously nor has it been changed today. The latest director has the following education as listed by Wikipedia: Homendy is a native of Plainville, Connecticut. She earned a Bachelor of Arts degree from Pennsylvania State University and is a master's candidate at Clemson University. Notice the absence of what degrees she achieved, she is purely a political appointment. Neither of these people have the expertise to lead a safety agency.
Clearly Boeing failed it's workers, investors, and the flying public. They will be held accountable and pay dearly for their mistakes. Unfortunately this movie missed the elephant in the room, our safety agencies need to be cleared of political appointments and experts installed in those positions. Your life is in the hands of people profiting from placing you in danger. They exist in both the industry and in the agencies responsible for protecting you.
Clearly Boeing failed it's workers, investors, and the flying public. They will be held accountable and pay dearly for their mistakes. Unfortunately this movie missed the elephant in the room, our safety agencies need to be cleared of political appointments and experts installed in those positions. Your life is in the hands of people profiting from placing you in danger. They exist in both the industry and in the agencies responsible for protecting you.
This does not hold back.
What a truly fascinating watch this was, a documentary that truly does not hold back. As someone that follows the news with interest, I remember watching news of both tragic crashes with horror, and in both cases, it was definitely the theory that both were due to pilot error, this gives you the true story.
It's almost brutal, it really does put Boeing, and its executives, indeed its company ethos to the sword, initially I thought the documentary focused too much on Boeing's history, but in hindsight it's all in context, it's all fully relevant, and all explained.
The eighties were amazing in so many ways, awful in others, definitely the era of greed, in The UK we had Thatcher, for The U. S. Wall Street, you will see here the consequences of a Company for whom the only focus is profit.
The camera footage of the worker being told about missing parts is on of the most shocking things I've seen for some time.
It's very well made, with some fascinating interviews, it's more on the factual side that the sensational side.
A fascinating documentary, 9/10.
It's almost brutal, it really does put Boeing, and its executives, indeed its company ethos to the sword, initially I thought the documentary focused too much on Boeing's history, but in hindsight it's all in context, it's all fully relevant, and all explained.
The eighties were amazing in so many ways, awful in others, definitely the era of greed, in The UK we had Thatcher, for The U. S. Wall Street, you will see here the consequences of a Company for whom the only focus is profit.
The camera footage of the worker being told about missing parts is on of the most shocking things I've seen for some time.
It's very well made, with some fascinating interviews, it's more on the factual side that the sensational side.
A fascinating documentary, 9/10.
Le saviez-vous
- GaffesAt 1:10:25, Andy Pasztor can be seen writing "Pilots at the conbtrol" briefly, before "conbtrol" is auto-corrected to "control".
- Citations
Andy Pasztor: In addition to Congress trying to get to the bottom of this, the families of the victims really took this on as a personal issue. They felt that there needed to be some explanation of how two planes could have crashed within such a short period of time.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Last Week Tonight with John Oliver: Boeing (2024)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Downfall: The Case Against Boeing
- Lieux de tournage
- Seattle, Washington, États-Unis(initial Boeing HQ and center of operations)
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée
- 1h 29m(89 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant








