Painkiller

It's not bad and quite enjoyable. The problem here for anyone who has taken the time to watch the massively superior Dopesick is that they have watched Dopesick. This version of events seems quite rushed and doesn't come close to the nuanced performances and detailed storytelling of Dopesick. It's hard to put your finger on the why this fails to be as impactful as Dopesick but it fails big time. After watching Dopesick I did quite a bit of research on the subject matter and found the storytelling to be quite accurate in that production. I feel so sorry for all the people whose lives have been ruined by this travesty and genuinely feel Dopesick does a much better job of telling this unfortunate story.

This story has already been dramatised by hulu in dopesick so redoing the exact same thing, when the first time it was done so immaculately, is bound to not go that well...this is a much more superficial version in the sense that it is created with a more entertaining aspect than adherence to the actual truth and it is also squeezed in only 6 episodes when there is so much more to cover. It is an ok show, with few good performances, like Richard Sackler's role, but only because the story behind it is so fascinating, otherwise there is nothing great to hold the viewer. It is like when Jennifer Lawrence was booked to play Elizabeth Holmes in the film Bad Blood but after seeing The Dropout and Amanda Seyfried's performance, she said "what's the point in redoing something that has been done so well?" and quit...So if you want the best version of this story, check out Dopesick.

I'm surprised by the low ratings and glad I didn't read before watching because I enjoyed the show.

It showed various perspectives from the Sackler family and employees, the pharma reps, the doctors, the whistleblowers, the patients and then the addicts.

I thought it was filmed well, there were comedic moments not to poke fun at the subject matter which is very sad but more at the impotence of the law makers and greed of the Sackler family and it's employees and those who jumped ship.

I thought the ending was a bit rushed I'd have liked more epilogue but overall we binged over 2 days as it was very watchable.

First of all, I am not going to score this show. I find it not really appropriate to score a show that is about the pain and immense sorrow that is caused to people. And the main reason is that still many millions of people struggle daily with the (after-)effects of what the Sackler family did...

As society, we need to ask ourselves how on earth it is possible that the Sackler family - whom is directly responsible for addicting millions of people worldwide - is allowed to get away with what they have done. And it is not only the additing of so many people... No! It is the consequential deaths that are the result of those addictions.

That the Sackler family is able to still live in extreme luxury is beyond me. Yes, they may have 'settled' federal lawsuits by paying a multi-billion fine, but that was a small amount compared to the gigantic profits they have made altogether.

I think it therefore all the more important that the victims - and even casualties - are put center stage by such a series as this. Where we had "Dopesick" (Hulu) some time ago - where already a large group of society is made aware of what happened - it is this time "Painkiller" that is dropped on the Netflix service. And I hope that as many people as possible will watch this show. Because the Sackler family did get away with addicting millions of people! And they should be made accountable for all deaths that they caused!

If I look at the storyline of "Painkiller", it contains all the main elements that we also know from "Dopesick". I personally found that "Dopesick" gave more details, but that can also expected with its duration of over 8 hours, versus around 4.5 hours for "Dopesick".

The acting in "Dopesick" is overall pretty decent, with a clear outperformance by Matthew Broderick. Dina Shihabi, whom we know from e.g. "Archive 81" - a show that unfortunately got discontinued after 1 season - also did a pretty good job as one of the bad guys.

Investigator Edie Flowers starts spotting worrying signs when a new wonder drug called oxycontin is released, she soon discovers that Big Pharma is a tough but to crack, especially when the law appears to be on their side.

I have to say, I didn't quite associate some of the negative reviews with the show that I have just finished binge watching. I'd suggest it's a little slow to start, but it does definitely get moving from about episode four or five onwards.

It's been a while since I binge watched a six part series, this is definitely a series that makes you want to watch, the story is absolutely captivating, yes the series is flawed, and it's far from perfect, but it does manage to show you the dangers of addiction.

I won't even get into my opinions of The US Healthcare system, and the fact that pharmaceuticals can be advertised.....in the same way that manufacturers try and convince you to buy fabric softener, it's shocking.....

The introductions are so sad and incredibly moving, those are some very powerful words.

I think Glen's story stood out for me most of all, you see a guy who has everything lose the lot, and just how quickly a regular person can fall of the rails, another victim of addiction.

Some of the acting was very good here, Matthew Broderick did a great job as Sackler, especially when he starts coming off the rails somewhat. I thought Uzo Aduba did a really good job too, there are some very passionate scenes.

Worth seeing.

7/10.