Ce drame expose les causes et conséquences de la crise des opioïdes aux États-Unis en suivant ses auteurs, ses victimes et une avocate qui veut faire éclater la vérité.Ce drame expose les causes et conséquences de la crise des opioïdes aux États-Unis en suivant ses auteurs, ses victimes et une avocate qui veut faire éclater la vérité.Ce drame expose les causes et conséquences de la crise des opioïdes aux États-Unis en suivant ses auteurs, ses victimes et une avocate qui veut faire éclater la vérité.
- Prix
- 2 victoires et 3 nominations au total
Parcourir les épisodes
Avis en vedette
Investigator Edie Flowers starts spotting worrying signs when a new wonder drug called oxycontin is released, she soon discovers that Big Pharma is a tough but to crack, especially when the law appears to be on their side.
I have to say, I didn't quite associate some of the negative reviews with the show that I have just finished binge watching. I'd suggest it's a little slow to start, but it does definitely get moving from about episode four or five onwards.
It's been a while since I binge watched a six part series, this is definitely a series that makes you want to watch, the story is absolutely captivating, yes the series is flawed, and it's far from perfect, but it does manage to show you the dangers of addiction.
I won't even get into my opinions of The US Healthcare system, and the fact that pharmaceuticals can be advertised.....in the same way that manufacturers try and convince you to buy fabric softener, it's shocking.....
The introductions are so sad and incredibly moving, those are some very powerful words.
I think Glen's story stood out for me most of all, you see a guy who has everything lose the lot, and just how quickly a regular person can fall of the rails, another victim of addiction.
Some of the acting was very good here, Matthew Broderick did a great job as Sackler, especially when he starts coming off the rails somewhat. I thought Uzo Aduba did a really good job too, there are some very passionate scenes.
Worth seeing.
7/10.
I have to say, I didn't quite associate some of the negative reviews with the show that I have just finished binge watching. I'd suggest it's a little slow to start, but it does definitely get moving from about episode four or five onwards.
It's been a while since I binge watched a six part series, this is definitely a series that makes you want to watch, the story is absolutely captivating, yes the series is flawed, and it's far from perfect, but it does manage to show you the dangers of addiction.
I won't even get into my opinions of The US Healthcare system, and the fact that pharmaceuticals can be advertised.....in the same way that manufacturers try and convince you to buy fabric softener, it's shocking.....
The introductions are so sad and incredibly moving, those are some very powerful words.
I think Glen's story stood out for me most of all, you see a guy who has everything lose the lot, and just how quickly a regular person can fall of the rails, another victim of addiction.
Some of the acting was very good here, Matthew Broderick did a great job as Sackler, especially when he starts coming off the rails somewhat. I thought Uzo Aduba did a really good job too, there are some very passionate scenes.
Worth seeing.
7/10.
Honestly we had Dopesick showing the same story about the opioid crisis in USA. And everyone thought that was fire !
This garbage show is nothing more than a Netflix revisited story about opioids. And won't win any Emmy.
This show is saved by Matthew Brodrick of course, that's enjoyable to see him back on the screen. But man the rest of the cast can't help the poor attempt of this show.
I don't know if Netflix had the idea before or after Hulu to make this happen, but man they missed it with this one (again).
Some plots are explained/shown as if the viewer had an IQ of an oyster.
Better pass than waste your time people !
This garbage show is nothing more than a Netflix revisited story about opioids. And won't win any Emmy.
This show is saved by Matthew Brodrick of course, that's enjoyable to see him back on the screen. But man the rest of the cast can't help the poor attempt of this show.
I don't know if Netflix had the idea before or after Hulu to make this happen, but man they missed it with this one (again).
Some plots are explained/shown as if the viewer had an IQ of an oyster.
Better pass than waste your time people !
This story has already been dramatised by hulu in dopesick so redoing the exact same thing, when the first time it was done so immaculately, is bound to not go that well...this is a much more superficial version in the sense that it is created with a more entertaining aspect than adherence to the actual truth and it is also squeezed in only 6 episodes when there is so much more to cover. It is an ok show, with few good performances, like Richard Sackler's role, but only because the story behind it is so fascinating, otherwise there is nothing great to hold the viewer. It is like when Jennifer Lawrence was booked to play Elizabeth Holmes in the film Bad Blood but after seeing The Dropout and Amanda Seyfried's performance, she said "what's the point in redoing something that has been done so well?" and quit...So if you want the best version of this story, check out Dopesick.
This is a well done, dark journey into an American hell created by an evil family and their soulless minions. While it is disgraceful that the endless suffering of the victims and their families has been turned into entertainment, this is important. The world needs to see what happens when an evil family is allowed to destroy America for profit. This covers the same material as Dopesick but a different take. Same info and honestly I enjoyed both. The portrayal of the Sacklers in both is not flattering. Truly evil people. The actors were amazing. A list talent and great writing. Highly recommend this and every American should see it.
I'm surprised by the low ratings and glad I didn't read before watching because I enjoyed the show.
It showed various perspectives from the Sackler family and employees, the pharma reps, the doctors, the whistleblowers, the patients and then the addicts.
I thought it was filmed well, there were comedic moments not to poke fun at the subject matter which is very sad but more at the impotence of the law makers and greed of the Sackler family and it's employees and those who jumped ship.
I thought the ending was a bit rushed I'd have liked more epilogue but overall we binged over 2 days as it was very watchable.
It showed various perspectives from the Sackler family and employees, the pharma reps, the doctors, the whistleblowers, the patients and then the addicts.
I thought it was filmed well, there were comedic moments not to poke fun at the subject matter which is very sad but more at the impotence of the law makers and greed of the Sackler family and it's employees and those who jumped ship.
I thought the ending was a bit rushed I'd have liked more epilogue but overall we binged over 2 days as it was very watchable.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThis series is based on Barry Meier's book Pain Killer: An Empire of Deceit and the Origin of America's Opioid Epidemic and the New Yorker article "The Family That Built the Empire of Pain," by Patrick Radden Keefe.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How many seasons does Painkiller have?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Durée48 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 16:9 HD
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant