Un loup-garou en Angleterre

There is nothing about this that is good, the script, the acting, the directing all bad but the film is much better than the sum of its parts!!! Even the werewolves who look like something from early 70s Doctor Who help tie this together

I didn't watch the previews, but I saw it added to the app I watch movies on and the poster looked cool, so I decided to watch it. I don't know why, but I was kinda expecting more from it. Its very B. Corny, kinda funny and kinda stupid. It definitely wasn't the worst movie I've ever seen by any stretch, though. A lot of other werewolf comedy-horror films are sorta heavy on gore, but this movie isn't. That was part of the reason it was just kinda meh for me. It's very mild in that department. From the start I was thinking it was kinda stupid, but not stupid enough to stop watching. You might have the same feelings if you flip it on, where its not the best but you still wanna see it through. I'm on a middle ground with it. I wouldn't say not to watch it, but if you don't, you're not missing out on a real must see movie. That sounds kinda mean to the directors and I'm not trying to be, but its just my personal criticism.

Well, the movie was branded as "the best werewolf movie in years", and I must admit that I was definitely intrigued and had some hopes for this movie when I sat down to watch it. But the best werewolf movie in years, nah, not so much.

"A Werewolf in England" was watchable, for sure, but this was hardly an outstanding werewolf movie, much less the best in years. The movie was adequately entertaining, but I must admit that I sat with a 'was that really it' sensation as the movie came to an end.

The storyline in the movie was fairly okay. Sure, it was straight forward and offering no surprises or plot twists at all, so it was a bit on the generic side, and you knew exactly what would happened long before it happened, so writer and director Charlie Steeds wasn't exactly going out all the way here, but instead playing it way too safe.

As for the acting in the movie, well I will say that the actors and actresses performed well enough, given the limitations imposed upon them with the script and the very bland and often pointless characters they had to work with. Yeah, many of the characters were just so mundane that you didn't even remember their names, much less cared a bit about their fate and what not.

The effects in "A Werewolf in England" were adequate, and the werewolf costumes were definitely nice to look at, but the gait that they walked with was just unbearable to look at, and it just made it all the more comical to look at that it added to the thrill or excitement.

All in all, "A Werewolf in England" is a watchable movie, but just don't get your hopes up for it, because this was very bland and mediocre movie. I am rating it a five out of ten stars. This was by no means a particularly outstanding or memorable werewolf movie, nor was it a movie that I fancy sitting down to watch a second time, as it just didn't have the contents to support a second viewing.

Had good hopes for this movie when i saw the stills and premise for it, but the acting is below avarage and the werewolfs themself move like they are constantly trying to swat off flies.. although its a low budget movie i was very dissapointed in the lack of movement in the heads.. very easy to see its just a helmet without any mouth movements at all :(

This movie is in the style of old Hammer House of Horror movies that were so popular in the 70's and preceding decades. It's funny, bloody and downright disgusting at times! (Poop, blood and farts abound) No special effects as such but if it's a blood soaked comedy you're after, this movie is for you!