Après avoir commis une série de meurtres, un neurologue rend visite à un tueur incarcéré, vivant en exil.Après avoir commis une série de meurtres, un neurologue rend visite à un tueur incarcéré, vivant en exil.Après avoir commis une série de meurtres, un neurologue rend visite à un tueur incarcéré, vivant en exil.
Cameron Storm Clarke
- Clarence
- (as Cameron Stormclarke)
Avis en vedette
What is the core of the story?
Like the 80's style but did not execute it good enough makes it vague in where it wants to go. Like how it aligned with the actions, but the actions did not do anything... it does shows how it evolves and steps, but the scientific part is hard to follow making not understandable where it wants to go. Is it entertainment or knowledgeable?
Everything is done very low quality making it not pleasant to watch.... pity could be so much more...
Like the 80's style but did not execute it good enough makes it vague in where it wants to go. Like how it aligned with the actions, but the actions did not do anything... it does shows how it evolves and steps, but the scientific part is hard to follow making not understandable where it wants to go. Is it entertainment or knowledgeable?
Everything is done very low quality making it not pleasant to watch.... pity could be so much more...
This movie has the look of a 70s cheap exploitation movie. The story that is told is boring at best. The cinematography looks bland. Only one character is explored, but only on the surface. We learn absolutly nothing about motives or even the overhyped neurology basics. Anything resembling a plot is absent in this movie.
The filmmakers tried to use some clever storytelling by offscreen mentioning one keyword about psychopaths and then playing a corresponding scene from the life of the main character. The only problem is, the scenes and the keyword never seem to fit together. Usually it's just another victim and another killing. Sorry, that's just not enough to make a movie work.
The filmmakers tried to use some clever storytelling by offscreen mentioning one keyword about psychopaths and then playing a corresponding scene from the life of the main character. The only problem is, the scenes and the keyword never seem to fit together. Usually it's just another victim and another killing. Sorry, that's just not enough to make a movie work.
When you wish the title was " 3 killings " .....this will send you to sleep , boring and repetitive come to mind,..... but maybe voyeurism just not my cup of tea .
This is is a well made movie, but the acting is not very good at all. The casting choices were a little strange as well, as in the main character and his brother, unless one or both of them were adopted they didn't seem like they were related at all. Some scenes that were supossed to be scary or at least serious, elicited laughter, for example, the second bath tub scene with the main character and his first victim. The story needed some tune ups, it's apparently based on a real life geraman serial killer so I'd think there must be ways to add some suspense or scary aspects to the story. Overall, I think if there had been more money spent on making this movie, for better actors, better sets, etc, it could have been better.
Ok, you have to throw out any ratings on here above a 7, they are all BS and most likely tied to the movies. Mindhunter, really. Should not even be mentioned in the same breath...
Wait for a free release and save your money.
Wow, movies really really suck in past year... put actors on vaccine list so they can get back to work please, oh and writers and directors lol...
seriously....
seriously....
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesLargely inspired by the killings of Dennis Nilsen, with events moved to America.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is 15 Killings?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Durée1 heure 36 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39:1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant