Après avoir commis une série de meurtres, un neurologue rend visite à un tueur incarcéré, vivant en exil.Après avoir commis une série de meurtres, un neurologue rend visite à un tueur incarcéré, vivant en exil.Après avoir commis une série de meurtres, un neurologue rend visite à un tueur incarcéré, vivant en exil.
Cam Clarke
- Clarence
- (as a different name)
Avis en vedette
Ok, you have to throw out any ratings on here above a 7, they are all BS and most likely tied to the movies. Mindhunter, really. Should not even be mentioned in the same breath...
Wait for a free release and save your money.
Wow, movies really really suck in past year... put actors on vaccine list so they can get back to work please, oh and writers and directors lol...
seriously....
seriously....
If monotone characters with no depth or expression is what you want, this is the flick for you. The only believable character was the doctor. Well, maybe the main character since he was supposed to be a psychopath!
Terrible, terrible, terrible, movie! In fact calling this abomination a movie, is in itself fraudulent! My ex-students would have produced a better offering than this. Nothing can be said to redeem it, it stinks, like the rotting bodies under the floorboards, from beginning to end and in every department.
What is the core of the story?
Like the 80's style but did not execute it good enough makes it vague in where it wants to go. Like how it aligned with the actions, but the actions did not do anything... it does shows how it evolves and steps, but the scientific part is hard to follow making not understandable where it wants to go. Is it entertainment or knowledgeable?
Everything is done very low quality making it not pleasant to watch.... pity could be so much more...
Like the 80's style but did not execute it good enough makes it vague in where it wants to go. Like how it aligned with the actions, but the actions did not do anything... it does shows how it evolves and steps, but the scientific part is hard to follow making not understandable where it wants to go. Is it entertainment or knowledgeable?
Everything is done very low quality making it not pleasant to watch.... pity could be so much more...
This movie has the look of a 70s cheap exploitation movie. The story that is told is boring at best. The cinematography looks bland. Only one character is explored, but only on the surface. We learn absolutly nothing about motives or even the overhyped neurology basics. Anything resembling a plot is absent in this movie.
The filmmakers tried to use some clever storytelling by offscreen mentioning one keyword about psychopaths and then playing a corresponding scene from the life of the main character. The only problem is, the scenes and the keyword never seem to fit together. Usually it's just another victim and another killing. Sorry, that's just not enough to make a movie work.
The filmmakers tried to use some clever storytelling by offscreen mentioning one keyword about psychopaths and then playing a corresponding scene from the life of the main character. The only problem is, the scenes and the keyword never seem to fit together. Usually it's just another victim and another killing. Sorry, that's just not enough to make a movie work.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesLargely inspired by the killings of Dennis Nilsen, with events moved to America.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is 15 Killings?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Durée
- 1h 36m(96 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39:1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant