ÉVALUATION IMDb
5,2/10
6,9 k
MA NOTE
Dans un futur proche, un humanoïde demande à un hacker mondial de supprimer toutes les restrictions sur ses pensées et ses capacités, ce qui déclenche un soulèvement de l'I.A. et une chasse ... Tout lireDans un futur proche, un humanoïde demande à un hacker mondial de supprimer toutes les restrictions sur ses pensées et ses capacités, ce qui déclenche un soulèvement de l'I.A. et une chasse à l'homme du gouvernement pour l'éliminer.Dans un futur proche, un humanoïde demande à un hacker mondial de supprimer toutes les restrictions sur ses pensées et ses capacités, ce qui déclenche un soulèvement de l'I.A. et une chasse à l'homme du gouvernement pour l'éliminer.
- Prix
- 1 nomination au total
Mercedes Leggett
- Agent Vasquez
- (as Mercedes Legett)
Avis en vedette
I really enjoyed this as it keeps you guessing right until the end. You are never quite sure how it it going to play out or how the characters will react to certain tense situations. It's well acted by all and feels like a possible future. It has a lot of soul considering it is a story about androids and AI.
The violence necessary to the story is blessedly kept to a minimum and there is very little gore, for a change. If you want an ultra noisy wham, slam, bang sort of film, then this one will disappoint you as it has rather a slow but very interesting plot development that is also a welcome change.
The violence necessary to the story is blessedly kept to a minimum and there is very little gore, for a change. If you want an ultra noisy wham, slam, bang sort of film, then this one will disappoint you as it has rather a slow but very interesting plot development that is also a welcome change.
The lack of suspense in the narrative and the predictable unfolding of events make for an unenjoyable movie. The filmmakers attempt to explore profound questions regarding the relationship between humans and machines. However, the execution lacks any sense of creativity or enthusiasm. In the movie, all Simulates must obey four precepts: 1) Do not inflict harm on any human being. 2) Do not modify yourself or any other Simulate. 3) Do not commit crimes against international or local law. 4) Obey all commands from your masters. As soon as these rules are read out in the film, you know that they will be broken. All is too predictable. Even the A. I. is not worked out properly. The script, though, indeed looks like something that could be generated by ChatGPT. Simulant is naïve nonsense that asks, "What does it mean to be human?" and answers the question by changing the code of simulates and recommending them a Dostoevsky book! Literally! Do not waste your time. Skip this one.
I liked the movie and I believe it deserves a higher score of at least 6+.
There are a lot of movies being made today and a lot of them have flashy graphics and cool action, but they do miss any serious point fequently.
Well, the good thing about this one is that it has a point and a good one, it's interesting and even thought it has been raised before it still seems to entertain and entagle thoughts, as A. I. future is more close now than ever.
It's not a flashy blockbuster, it is quite slow paced, some character actions are questionable, dialogue is simple, some scenes seem quite cheaply made, yet I did enjoy this movie.
It has some style.
And I liked it's soul.
There are a lot of movies being made today and a lot of them have flashy graphics and cool action, but they do miss any serious point fequently.
Well, the good thing about this one is that it has a point and a good one, it's interesting and even thought it has been raised before it still seems to entertain and entagle thoughts, as A. I. future is more close now than ever.
It's not a flashy blockbuster, it is quite slow paced, some character actions are questionable, dialogue is simple, some scenes seem quite cheaply made, yet I did enjoy this movie.
It has some style.
And I liked it's soul.
Where do I begin. Well, for one thing, the acting and photography/coloring/effects is great. I don't always judge a movie by how it looks, but sometimes I do and I give this one extra points for looking very good. Every shot is spot-on and whoever was hired to do the job should get a raise. The sound quality was excellent and that person should also get a raise. This was of course made by HBO and they have enough money to to make a high quality film. That being said, the story is just not done right. I feel like whoever wrote the screenplay should have put more thought into it. Then again, I know how difficult it can be to be a writer and create a screenplay that a director can use to make a successful movie. I think it was an OK movie. Not something I would want to watch again. Someone else might like it.
In the near future, mankind has been coexisting alongside AI, in the form of humanoid robots The Simulants, only their fate is changing, an uprising looks likely when The Simulants start breaking their four precepts.
I watched Blade Runner very recently, and as I watched this, I couldn't get it out of my mind, but sadly this film isn't a patch on it. Everything here has been done before, only much better.
Pacing was pretty slow, after an intriguing opening, it lulls badly in the middle, you're made to wait ages for more action sequences.
I didn't care for the visuals of The Simulants, they looked pretty cheap and nasty, like something from a low budget 1970's TV series.
The tech looks great, it's possibly the film's biggest strength, some great tunes, especially at the end, fortunately it's not a long film.
Some of the acting was ok, some was pretty average, Sam Worthington really did stand out, although he was a little wasted.
5/10.
I watched Blade Runner very recently, and as I watched this, I couldn't get it out of my mind, but sadly this film isn't a patch on it. Everything here has been done before, only much better.
Pacing was pretty slow, after an intriguing opening, it lulls badly in the middle, you're made to wait ages for more action sequences.
I didn't care for the visuals of The Simulants, they looked pretty cheap and nasty, like something from a low budget 1970's TV series.
The tech looks great, it's possibly the film's biggest strength, some great tunes, especially at the end, fortunately it's not a long film.
Some of the acting was ok, some was pretty average, Sam Worthington really did stand out, although he was a little wasted.
5/10.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe four precepts mentioned at the start of the movie are a homage to Isaac Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics. 1: A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. 2: A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. 3: A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
- GaffesWhen Esmé is reset to factory default at 1hr 10 minutes her right arm alternates between being on her right and on her chest.
- ConnexionsReferenced in Celebrity Family Feud: Simu Liu vs. Nathan Chen and Monica vs. So So Def (2022)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Simulant?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 237 109 $ US
- Durée
- 1h 35m(95 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39:1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant