The Bombing of Pan Am 103

It's been said this has strayed from the train of events somewhat, and may even have factual inaccuracies. Maybe so. However, I feel it has captured the essence of this awful tragedy - with a strong cast, well-written screenplay and thoughtful direction. I would like to know what the people of Lockerbie thought of it, as well as those (still with us) who were involved in the aftermath of the disaster - police, FBI, forensic experts and other professionals - as well as families of the victims. Arguably it might bring back memories which many would best not wish to have resurrected, but these views would surely be authentic.

The Bombing of Pan Am 103, broadcast by the BBC in spring 2025, is a gripping and respectful dramatisation of one of the most tragic and far-reaching acts of terrorism in modern history. While the series is fictionalised, it remains rooted in fact, offering a detailed and emotionally resonant account of the investigation that followed the downing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, in December 1988.

The series wisely centres on the joint effort between the Scottish police-who had jurisdiction over the crime-and the American law enforcement and intelligence agencies. Rather than sensationalise, the drama methodically follows the slow, painstaking process of piecing together a complex international puzzle from fragments of evidence scattered across miles of Scottish countryside. From wreckage analysis to diplomatic wrangling, the story never loses sight of the monumental challenge investigators faced in identifying those responsible.

Amid the procedural elements, The Bombing of Pan Am 103 thoughtfully weaves in human stories that bring heart to the investigation. Characters like Steven Flannigan and Moira Shearer provide windows into the lived trauma, grief, and resolve that shaped the response to the bombing. The script gives room for emotional truth without detracting from the seriousness of the investigative narrative.

The drama also honours the long struggle to bring the perpetrators to justice, a battle that spanned from 1988 to 2001 and, remarkably, has only seen two men brought to trial. That ongoing sense of partial closure is handled with care, never overstated but always present.

Kathryn Thurman's advocacy for a more compassionate, people-focused disaster response is a welcome thematic thread, underlining the birth of a new model in dealing with such large-scale trauma-where empathy is just as critical as efficiency. The relationships that form between the people of Lockerbie, the victims' families, and those from the various agencies involved lend an unexpected warmth to the story, revealing a quiet solidarity forged in the aftermath of unspeakable loss.

The most haunting and powerful moment comes at the end, with a display of all 270 names of those killed-three solemn columns of 90 names each. It's a stark reminder of the scale of this tragedy and a fitting tribute that underscores the series' message: that behind every headline, there are hundreds of stories, families, and lives forever altered.

A respectful, humanised portrayal of a global tragedy, The Bombing of Pan Am 103 succeeds as both a compelling drama and an important memorial.

Well done to the bbc, they honestly suprised me so much with how well this series was, I couldn't wait to watch the next episode and the one after that. The acting was also superb , a huge round of applause to the director and how he successfully managed the series making it more than just a tv show.

Why is this filmed in the dark?

This BBC version works hard to be different from the ITV version shown 4 months earlier. This version takes a different perspective, that of the investigation, which has drawn criticism from other reviewers. This may not mean much to those not in the UK, so look for the Lockerbie drama with Colin Firth.

It's hard to not compare the two especially as they are broadcast so close together. Both highlight how poor security was and leaves questions hanging.

It's a solid docudrama, let down by poor production and awful accents by some usually great actors. And sadly that's all that really matters.

This is what the BBC does so well. Not over dramatised, but based on good research and faithful to the events.

I've given 7/10 until I see more but with just episode 1, I am blown away by the preparation, scene setting, extras, props.

Initially disappointed with the representation of 1988 like it was the 60s or 70s! I remember that year and the UK was much more power dressing and double breasted jackets... Though maybe not in Lockerbie, tbf.

Acting and script is a bit patchy, but there are some great actors to carry this off, albeit with some sketchy US accents.

Lastly, to reflect on the event itself. What a dreadful thing to do. So much terror, and for what. The btards. It's a testament to this tragedy that we are reconstructing it nearly 40 years later.