Le déroulement d'une convention d'astronomie Junior Stargazer est spectaculairement perturbé par des événements qui changent le monde.Le déroulement d'une convention d'astronomie Junior Stargazer est spectaculairement perturbé par des événements qui changent le monde.Le déroulement d'une convention d'astronomie Junior Stargazer est spectaculairement perturbé par des événements qui changent le monde.
- Réalisation
- Scénaristes
- Vedettes
- Prix
- 4 victoires et 86 nominations au total
Steve Park
- Roger Cho
- (as Stephen Park)
6,4140.4K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Avis en vedette
Visually Beautiful & Well-Crafted. Story Ranges From Fine, To Semi-Frustrating, & Slightly Pretentious.
Those who thought this was a "boring" film, should not be criticized for thinking this. Asteroid City is a visual wonder and treat of world building. Wes Anderson's productions are easily well-known for their impressive artistic visual structure and camera work. No disappointment in any of these categories. Featuring a massive array of talent which included a cast of 4 Oscar winners and 9 Oscar nominees, all giving solid theatrical-style performances. The setting is an absolute delight, and ranks as one of the top production designs in any Wes Anderson film. All the characters are carefully pieced, selected, and framed. All building up to a finale which I considered a pretentious, underwhelming, and slightly dissatisfying. It's hard to not see this particular story as Wes Anderson being unsure about which direction to go in. This was easily a story Anderson wrote/worked on while stuck in quarantine during COVID. The themes of loss, uncertainty, entrapment, search for answers, childhood into adulthood are all well-received and present. However, once the themes completely over take the narrative and substance, that's when the movie starts to disappoint. All these themes could've fit well into a story which resulted in a fun gimmicky alien invasion story, just like in "Mars Attacks!" which the film even makes a hidden reference to. Or a narrative which leads into alien abduction. Something....anything. Any conflict better than simply, "they're all stuck in quarantine". Another problem with Asteroid City is the story's massive number of characters. I love a story which gives every little character a unique presence to the story. Problem is, there are enjoying scenes with these characters, but when the movie ends I was still pondering if these scenes were needed. They added little to the narrative, took time away from the main conflict, and resulted in a unbalanced flow of the narrative. A successful balance of adults and children in the narrative was achieved far better in Moonrise Kingdom than in Anderson's effort this time. While the character payoffs do make sense, some of the key payoffs feel shallow than unsatisfying. The payoffs you would easily imagine the film going in simply do not happen. Asteroid City is easily one of my favorite world buildings in a Wes Anderson film. I was hooked within the opening minutes, and yet it felt unused to its full potential. Shame too, because this could've easily have been a great film.
There is enjoyment to be found throughout Asteroid City, but in the end the descriptive words used regarding the narrative would have to include, "underwhelming" and "cheated".
There is enjoyment to be found throughout Asteroid City, but in the end the descriptive words used regarding the narrative would have to include, "underwhelming" and "cheated".
Pretty film. Indigestible plot
People were laughing in the quaint historic theater I watched this film in. But I was not. I laughed one time, when you watch it you'll know the time.
The striking thing about these last couple of Wes Anderson movies is how they're becoming a parody of themselves. I can appreciate film as art vs film as entertainment. This takes entertainment disguised as art and commercializes it to a degree I find distasteful.
It was a pretty film. I loved the colors. I can respect it's aesthetic and that's where all the stars came from. I also love Schwartzmann.
The way the story was told as some kind of slowly unfolding meta-melodrama of a play within a film managed to completely chop the film into indigestible pieces. Ive rarely been that disinterested in the plot of a film.
Last thought. What on earth makes all of these famous actors want to be in these films??? Is it money? Is it the desire to see your own face with some pretty symmetrical colors in the background? Wes Anderson hasn't made a good film in years. We can continue to respect him from afar for doing something unique. Far enough away we don't have to watch....
The striking thing about these last couple of Wes Anderson movies is how they're becoming a parody of themselves. I can appreciate film as art vs film as entertainment. This takes entertainment disguised as art and commercializes it to a degree I find distasteful.
It was a pretty film. I loved the colors. I can respect it's aesthetic and that's where all the stars came from. I also love Schwartzmann.
The way the story was told as some kind of slowly unfolding meta-melodrama of a play within a film managed to completely chop the film into indigestible pieces. Ive rarely been that disinterested in the plot of a film.
Last thought. What on earth makes all of these famous actors want to be in these films??? Is it money? Is it the desire to see your own face with some pretty symmetrical colors in the background? Wes Anderson hasn't made a good film in years. We can continue to respect him from afar for doing something unique. Far enough away we don't have to watch....
A very odd Wes Anderson film
There were two perspectives I noted while watching it.
1.) It is commentary on the state of cinema. A movie within a movie where the production of the "blockbuster" makes no sense. But as the actors in the film slowly question why they are even making it, they realize its ok if the film they're making is fun. Life sometimes has no rationale, it's just something we experience. Trying to find meaning in something so ridiculous is the point of Asteroid City.
2.) It is commentary on the 2020 Covid Pandemic. Asteroid City bears witness to a life-changing event and is forced into quarantine. Characters try to find meaning to all of it but life has a funny way of making no sense. Eventually, the quarantine lifts and life resumes. What was once a traumatic event feels like yesterday's news.
In a literal sense, it's a movie about a stage-play. Asteroid City is the play, and the black and white stuff is real-life. When the playwright dies unexpectedly, the actors are left confused because they never found out what the point of the play was. A sense of loss both literally and metaphorically.
It's very much about the struggle to make sense of an absurd world, and the different ways people cope with that. It's a VERY existentialist film, and IMHO steeped in the philosophy of Camus and Sartre.
1.) It is commentary on the state of cinema. A movie within a movie where the production of the "blockbuster" makes no sense. But as the actors in the film slowly question why they are even making it, they realize its ok if the film they're making is fun. Life sometimes has no rationale, it's just something we experience. Trying to find meaning in something so ridiculous is the point of Asteroid City.
2.) It is commentary on the 2020 Covid Pandemic. Asteroid City bears witness to a life-changing event and is forced into quarantine. Characters try to find meaning to all of it but life has a funny way of making no sense. Eventually, the quarantine lifts and life resumes. What was once a traumatic event feels like yesterday's news.
In a literal sense, it's a movie about a stage-play. Asteroid City is the play, and the black and white stuff is real-life. When the playwright dies unexpectedly, the actors are left confused because they never found out what the point of the play was. A sense of loss both literally and metaphorically.
It's very much about the struggle to make sense of an absurd world, and the different ways people cope with that. It's a VERY existentialist film, and IMHO steeped in the philosophy of Camus and Sartre.
Visually beautiful, but weak narrative lacks heart
As much as I love the artistic visuals and whimsical charm of a Wes Anderson film, this one was mildly disappointing. There were long speeches that didn't land with humor, weird pacing issues, and a nested framing device of a TV broadcast, the play, and its real-world creators that didn't do anything for me. Maybe it would take a repeat viewing, because the intention behind this was confusing, and it overshadowed the fine little moments that were scattered throughout the movie. As with The French Dispatch, the cast is jam-packed with stars, but unnecessarily so, as many seemed underused, and it felt like there were too many characters. This one needed simplification, a better story, and more heart.
This cast doesn't deserve this script
Wes Anderson drummed up a magnificent cast. At least ten of them could carry a triple A movie by themselves. Unfortunately, Wes forgot that a good movie needs a good plot as well.
The visuals are outstanding, almost every shot is also an award winning photo. The acting is superb. The setting is magnificent and almost everything about this movie is perfect.
Everything but the plot. If you like humor, you'll like this film. If you come for the visuals, you'll love this film. If you're into acting, you'll have an excellent time. But if you want to be engaged? Look elsewhere.
Dear Wes, your dialogues are hilarious and witty. Your plots lack substance. Work on your plots.
The visuals are outstanding, almost every shot is also an award winning photo. The acting is superb. The setting is magnificent and almost everything about this movie is perfect.
Everything but the plot. If you like humor, you'll like this film. If you come for the visuals, you'll love this film. If you're into acting, you'll have an excellent time. But if you want to be engaged? Look elsewhere.
Dear Wes, your dialogues are hilarious and witty. Your plots lack substance. Work on your plots.
Wes Anderson Films as Ranked by IMDb Rating
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesJason Schwartzman used the incomplete on-ramp freeway as a place to relax on set in between takes. "I would go up there all the time and sit up there. (...) Don't tell anyone. It's my secret spot. My secret spot in Asteroid City. It's kind of a hidden gem."
- GaffesThe newspaper shows a photo of the alien with a shadow, as if taken with a flashbulb, but Augie did not use a flash.
- Citations
Augie Steenbeck: I still don't understand the play.
Schubert Green: Doesn't matter. Just keep telling the story.
- Générique farfeluAt the very end of the end credits, over a black screen a voice whispers, "Wicked."
- Autres versionsTheatrically, the film is presented entirely within a 2.39:1 frame; the corresponding academy ratio 1.37:1 scenes are windowboxed within that frame. The Blu-Ray, DVD, and streaming version presents everything within a 1.78:1 framing, letterboxing the 2.39:1 segments and pillarboxing the 1.37:1 segments. The opening Focus Features and Indian Paintbrush logos are presented in full 1.78:1.
- Bandes originalesLast Train to San Fernando
Written by Sylvester DeVere, Randolph Padmore, Kenneth St. Bernard
Performed by Johnny Duncan and the Blue Grass Boys
Courtesy of Columbia Records Nashville
By arrangement with Sony Music Entertainment
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
24 Frames From Wes Anderson Films
24 Frames From Wes Anderson Films
Explore the memorable career of Wes Anderson through 24 stills from his movies.
- How long is Asteroid City?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 25 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 28 153 025 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 853 382 $ US
- 18 juin 2023
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 53 857 743 $ US
- Durée
- 1h 45m(105 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant




