En suivant des indices sur l'origine de l'humanité, une équipe trouve une structure sur une lune lointaine, mais réalise rapidement qu'ils ne sont pas seuls.En suivant des indices sur l'origine de l'humanité, une équipe trouve une structure sur une lune lointaine, mais réalise rapidement qu'ils ne sont pas seuls.En suivant des indices sur l'origine de l'humanité, une équipe trouve une structure sur une lune lointaine, mais réalise rapidement qu'ils ne sont pas seuls.
- Réalisation
- Scénaristes
- Vedettes
- Nommé pour 1 oscar
- 6 victoires et 47 nominations au total
Vladimir 'Furdo' Furdik
- Mercenary 2
- (as Vladimir Furdik)
C.C. Smiff
- Mercenary 3
- (as CC Smiff)
7,0689K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Avis en vedette
"Prometheus" (2012) - A Visually Stunning but Divisive Prequel
Ridley Scott returned to the "Alien" universe with "Prometheus," a prequel that explores the origins of humanity and the xenomorphs. Although it's set in the same universe, "Prometheus" takes a more philosophical and existential approach, raising questions about creation, the nature of life, and humanity's place in the cosmos.
The film follows the crew of the spaceship Prometheus, led by scientists Elizabeth Shaw (Noomi Rapace) and Charlie Holloway (Logan Marshall-Green), as they seek the origins of human life on a distant planet. Michael Fassbender shines as David, an android with his own agenda, delivering a performance that is both chilling and captivating. Charlize Theron and Idris Elba provide solid support, but the character development across the board is uneven, with some crew members feeling underutilized.
Visually, "Prometheus" is breathtaking. The film's production design, cinematography, and special effects are top-notch, creating a rich and immersive world that is both beautiful and terrifying. The alien landscapes, the intricate interiors of the spaceship, and the hauntingly enigmatic Engineers all contribute to the film's grandeur.
However, the film's narrative is where opinions diverge. "Prometheus" poses many intriguing questions but provides few clear answers, leaving some viewers frustrated by the film's ambiguity. The script, written by Jon Spaihts and Damon Lindelof, is filled with big ideas but sometimes lacks coherence and focus, leading to a story that feels disjointed at times.
While "Prometheus" doesn't deliver the intense horror of the original "Alien," it is a thought-provoking and visually stunning film that adds depth to the franchise's mythology. It's a film that aims high, even if it doesn't always hit its mark, and is worth watching for its ambition and the questions it raises about creation and existence.
The film follows the crew of the spaceship Prometheus, led by scientists Elizabeth Shaw (Noomi Rapace) and Charlie Holloway (Logan Marshall-Green), as they seek the origins of human life on a distant planet. Michael Fassbender shines as David, an android with his own agenda, delivering a performance that is both chilling and captivating. Charlize Theron and Idris Elba provide solid support, but the character development across the board is uneven, with some crew members feeling underutilized.
Visually, "Prometheus" is breathtaking. The film's production design, cinematography, and special effects are top-notch, creating a rich and immersive world that is both beautiful and terrifying. The alien landscapes, the intricate interiors of the spaceship, and the hauntingly enigmatic Engineers all contribute to the film's grandeur.
However, the film's narrative is where opinions diverge. "Prometheus" poses many intriguing questions but provides few clear answers, leaving some viewers frustrated by the film's ambiguity. The script, written by Jon Spaihts and Damon Lindelof, is filled with big ideas but sometimes lacks coherence and focus, leading to a story that feels disjointed at times.
While "Prometheus" doesn't deliver the intense horror of the original "Alien," it is a thought-provoking and visually stunning film that adds depth to the franchise's mythology. It's a film that aims high, even if it doesn't always hit its mark, and is worth watching for its ambition and the questions it raises about creation and existence.
Not what I was hoping for
It's good to see that Ridley Scott still has the same vision for stylistic sets and atmospheric lighting.Lots of dripping water and eery shadows as one might expect from the old master. The special effects are impressive, the CGI is great, the technology is plausible for the turn of the next century. But - and I'm afraid it's a big but - the plot is disjointed, the characters two dimensional and the script is, well, not the best. Far too many things happen which simply make no sense at all, or just don't tally with "what we know already" about the Alien universe. Far too many plot mechanisms, bits of tech and even shots and scenes are borrowed from other films - Serenity, independence day, The Mummy, Indiana Jones and the Crystal Skull, Pitch Black, X- Files. I won't go into detail because I can't do that without using spoilers, but try it yourself. Watch the film and see how many ripped off bits you can spot. Spectacular, yes. A great film? No. sadly not.
So much of this movie could have been easily fixed...
Don't get me wrong. It's gorgeous to look at, and I'm definitely going to go and see it again. It's really impressive.
But... It's stuffed with scenes without any payoff. Again and again it sets stuff up and then just... walks away from it.
In at least one unforgivably stupid scene, someone *literally* just walks away from an antagonist and leaves it there. And then doesn't tell anyone about it. Some of it's really effective. There are some scenes that are absolutely gripping. But so much of it doesn't make any sense...
Having said all that I think it's very clear that what I just saw was Prometheus part 1. It's very definitely supposed to have a sequel and I will certainly go to see the sequel. I think both movies taken together might score a 10.
But this movie by itself doesn't.
But... It's stuffed with scenes without any payoff. Again and again it sets stuff up and then just... walks away from it.
In at least one unforgivably stupid scene, someone *literally* just walks away from an antagonist and leaves it there. And then doesn't tell anyone about it. Some of it's really effective. There are some scenes that are absolutely gripping. But so much of it doesn't make any sense...
Having said all that I think it's very clear that what I just saw was Prometheus part 1. It's very definitely supposed to have a sequel and I will certainly go to see the sequel. I think both movies taken together might score a 10.
But this movie by itself doesn't.
Prometheus (2012)
Prometheus seems to have disappointed many viewers. Luckily for me I had no expectations, despite being a Scott film set in the same universe as the Alien franchise. The ship Prometheus goes looking for the beginning of mankind and what created us. It's a rather ambitious idea and the film should be given credit for trying to have some kind of theological and scientific debate. Unfortunately, the script also feels as though it has to give us the scares and frights that we associate with the Alien films. The majority of the film is intriguing but for every positive there is a negative. We get fascinating characters such as David, Vickers, and Janek. But they are mostly pushed aside to focus on the stupid scientist characters. Did the writers not realise how bad their work was? Rapace refuses to let one character take weapons on an expedition because it is a "scientific" mission. I call BS on that. No scientist would be so stupid as to explore a new planet, with no information on said planet, without a bit of protection. Characters decide to do stupid stuff, such as approach viscous looking new species etc. and it is here where the film annoyed me. The set design was beautiful, and I enjoyed the quieter moments the film had to offer, such as David's trying to understand emotions etc. The most interesting ideas the film has are delivered in single lines of dialogue, but are never explored. It's head and shoulders above many science fiction films of late, but it also needs a few sequels to clear things up. Unfortunately, that means it wasn't so great as a stand alone film.
Not in the same league as 'Alien' and 'Aliens', while heavily flawed it was still better than expected
'Alien' is still to this day a tense, shocking suspenseful and frightening masterpiece, one of my favourites of the genre. The bigger and bolder 'Aliens' is one of those rare sequels that is every bit as good as its predecessor. Both are two of my favourite films and the character of Ripley is one of the most iconic female characters in film.
To be honest, there were initial doubts about 'Prometheus'. Ridley Scott, as especially proved with 'Alien', 'Blade Runner' and 'Thelma and Louise' has shown that he has a lot of talent as a director, though his filmography is hit and miss. So that he was back on board as director and that there is a great cast promised much. There were worries however as well, due to some negative reception amongst audiences who criticised the script, story and notorious "plot holes".
Watching 'Prometheus' finally, it was a better film than expected though nowhere near in the same league as 'Alien' and 'Aliens'. That said, it was heavily flawed and there are criticised personally agreed with, though it doesn't deserve the 1/2/10 ratings which indicate that the film had no redeeming qualities at all which is not the case.
'Prometheus' best asset is the visuals. The settings look tremendous, of sheer beauty and with a real eeriness, the cinematography complements it perfectly and often powerfully arresting and the special effects are a feast for the eye. Scott's direction has moments where it is superb, if more in the visuals and spectacle than the narrative.
More than up to the level of the quality of the visuals is the cast. Noomi Rapace is an authoritative lead, and Michael Fassbender is even better in one of his best performances to date. Charlize Theron and Idris Elba also prove how talented they are as performers. Most of the rest are more than up to their level.
While the story is very problematic, it does have its moments. There is some tension, especially in the last act, parts are thought-provoking and there are some thrills. The music is suitably haunting.
However, there is a good deal that doesn't work. The script is often very weak, often rambling, clichéd and not very logical with some stupid decision making. The story does suffer from too many concepts not explored enough, some leaden pacing and at times a lack of cohesiveness.
Characters are also not particularly well-written, they seemed underdeveloped and there are too many of them, the decision making of some are a cause for extreme frustration. Not to mention lapses in logic, ridiculous science and parts that don't make as much sense as ought.
In conclusion, better than expected but heavily flawed and one may question the point of it. 6/10 Bethany Cox
To be honest, there were initial doubts about 'Prometheus'. Ridley Scott, as especially proved with 'Alien', 'Blade Runner' and 'Thelma and Louise' has shown that he has a lot of talent as a director, though his filmography is hit and miss. So that he was back on board as director and that there is a great cast promised much. There were worries however as well, due to some negative reception amongst audiences who criticised the script, story and notorious "plot holes".
Watching 'Prometheus' finally, it was a better film than expected though nowhere near in the same league as 'Alien' and 'Aliens'. That said, it was heavily flawed and there are criticised personally agreed with, though it doesn't deserve the 1/2/10 ratings which indicate that the film had no redeeming qualities at all which is not the case.
'Prometheus' best asset is the visuals. The settings look tremendous, of sheer beauty and with a real eeriness, the cinematography complements it perfectly and often powerfully arresting and the special effects are a feast for the eye. Scott's direction has moments where it is superb, if more in the visuals and spectacle than the narrative.
More than up to the level of the quality of the visuals is the cast. Noomi Rapace is an authoritative lead, and Michael Fassbender is even better in one of his best performances to date. Charlize Theron and Idris Elba also prove how talented they are as performers. Most of the rest are more than up to their level.
While the story is very problematic, it does have its moments. There is some tension, especially in the last act, parts are thought-provoking and there are some thrills. The music is suitably haunting.
However, there is a good deal that doesn't work. The script is often very weak, often rambling, clichéd and not very logical with some stupid decision making. The story does suffer from too many concepts not explored enough, some leaden pacing and at times a lack of cohesiveness.
Characters are also not particularly well-written, they seemed underdeveloped and there are too many of them, the decision making of some are a cause for extreme frustration. Not to mention lapses in logic, ridiculous science and parts that don't make as much sense as ought.
In conclusion, better than expected but heavily flawed and one may question the point of it. 6/10 Bethany Cox
All 'Alien' Movies Ranked by IMDb Rating
All 'Alien' Movies Ranked by IMDb Rating
See how the Alien franchise films rank, according to IMDb user ratings.
Blocage sonore
Prévisualisez la bande originale ici et continuez à écouter sur Amazon Music.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesComposer Marc Streitenfeld had the orchestra play his compositions backwards, and then digitally reversed the compositions for the final film. This made the music sound unusual and unsettling, which he felt was right for the film.
- Gaffes(at around 23 mins) A CO2 concentration of 3% in the atmosphere is still not a lethal amount for human beings. Only after 5% does it become toxic. However, Ford actually states that the CO2 levels are *over* 3%, suggesting that was the minimum amount the preliminary sensors had detected.
- Générique farfeluThere is a statement at the end of the closing credits: "Previous Footage Property of Weyland Corp. Building Better Worlds Since 10.11.12. weylandindustries.com/timeline"
- Autres versionsThe film's 70mm and Digital IMAX 3D release was presented open-matte, at an aspect ratio of 1.90:1, meaning more information was in the frame for the entire film.
- ConnexionsEdited into Sensible Cinema: Prometheus (2016)
- Bandes originalesPrelude for Piano No. 15 in D Flat Major, Op. 28 No. 15
Written by Frédéric Chopin
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Prometeo
- Lieux de tournage
- Dettifoss, Vatnajökull National Park, Iceland(Opening scene at waterfall)
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 130 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 126 477 084 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 51 050 101 $ US
- 10 juin 2012
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 403 354 469 $ US
- Durée
- 2h 4m(124 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant




