Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA man buys a house at a police auction, unaware of the house's horrific secrets of murder and madness, and quickly finds out the hard way that he is not welcome there.A man buys a house at a police auction, unaware of the house's horrific secrets of murder and madness, and quickly finds out the hard way that he is not welcome there.A man buys a house at a police auction, unaware of the house's horrific secrets of murder and madness, and quickly finds out the hard way that he is not welcome there.
- Scénariste
- Vedettes
Photos
Joseph Mazzaferro
- Filmmaker
- (as Anonymous)
Gail Yost
- Emily Yost
- (uncredited)
4,6165
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Avis en vedette
Not the worst, but still pretty bad overall.
It's not the worst found footage film I have ever seen, but overall I didn't like it. It has some nice creepy touches, but I think it wastes a lot of time on nothing when that could have been used to get more of a creepy vibe, have some other small weird things going on.
Especially at the beginning of the film when it showing a whole bunch of the properties, and some green field. It has a lot of found footage shaky camera happening too. Even on the none scary moments.
I did like how the guy did speak and explained a lot, because that did make it a little bit more engaging. I also liked that it had a couple of rewind moments to here's some creepy things that I missed before. But so much shaky cam!!
The background story was intriguing, but I did think they juster wasted too much time to enjoy it. Also it just kind of ends. Which was disappointing.
Especially at the beginning of the film when it showing a whole bunch of the properties, and some green field. It has a lot of found footage shaky camera happening too. Even on the none scary moments.
I did like how the guy did speak and explained a lot, because that did make it a little bit more engaging. I also liked that it had a couple of rewind moments to here's some creepy things that I missed before. But so much shaky cam!!
The background story was intriguing, but I did think they juster wasted too much time to enjoy it. Also it just kind of ends. Which was disappointing.
Horrible lol
What was this? This guy just copy and pasted the bad Ben film... it's almost exactly the same only changing names and the length was "shorter". Smh.. if you wanna watch the Walmart version of bad Ben... 👎🏽
A ripoff of Bad Ben
Not bad, but the ending didn't make any sense. I would like to know more about the back story and why the man did what he did at the end. Being a fan of the Bad Ben series, I had to watch this and see for myself. It's much shorter and has a lot less background story, but it's worth a watch. However, if you haven't seen Bad Ben, I highly recommend you to.
Aren't Movies Meant to Run Over an Hour?
Offered on Amazon Prime as a feature length film this shonk job of 'movie' had plenty of potential to be an unusually quirky and really frightening film, but instead it petered out after 30 minutes of repetitive and unimaginative monologue, unbelievable 'scared breathing' and even less frightening manifestations of a ghost you were pretty much expecting from minute one.
There was a lot of potential in this non movie/short film which the film maker either didn't notice or chose to ignore. Understandably, (but in no way justfiably), it looks like it was made during the initial full blown lockdown period of the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic and as such there was a severe limitation on any production, but there could have been so much more, should the film maker have paced it and simply employed a few more creative elements to build the initially successfully induced tension before prematurely revealing the 'ghost' and silly ending.
It almost had as much potential as was achieved by The Blair Witch Project which relied upon long scenes of nothing but darkness to build its tension, and that was the highest grossing film in history for its comparitive initial outlay to return ratio(!), so that's an indication of how much the makers of this film really missed the boat with what this could have been.
Despite it being picked up by streaming service like the one earlier mentioned and thus aapparently made a ldegitmate 'movie' through their dubious classification regime, of which this wasn't the only deceptively scant, offending offering, instead of the film creating goodwill with its original quirkiness and clever economy of cast and setting, it caused me to feel like I'd been ripped off becase I was expecting a full length feature and not merely a 40 odd minute rush job which the poorly orchestrated travesty of amateur make up artistry saw this thing quickly become when it was brought to its sudden and utterly illogical end, much like a cheap, pulp horror comic storyline where the production team were clearly far more intereted in receiving their day's end paycheue than in any way providing the public with a satisfying story, I regret to say there's not much more to this film than a house supposedly abandoned (and yet the lawns were illogically meticulously maintained and the tinterior clean and tidy after apparently a rotting corpse was left to fester in the bedroom whilst murderous squatters, not noted for their conscientious adherence to exquisite home care regimes abused the space for 12 solid weeks yet left it looking like home help just dusted it) so, between that unbelievable number of elemental failures to convey truth and numerous pieces of clean white string that looked like they had just been cut from a ball of newly purchased twine and inexplicably stuck onto a mirror with a chunk of whatever bodily fluid was most immeditely accessible, just like the short and intriguing title, with this disappointment that's about all you're going to see.
I'm cancelling Amazon Prime in protest at their scurrilous practice of flogging 40 minute bombs as feature films, mainly because I don't believe anyone who elevates themselves on blocks of cash really is above the rest of society's expectations of what they ought to receive when watching a movie nor does this automatically see them inherit the right of arbiter of popular culture with the soverign right to reclassify short films as movies and thereby to ripoff those paying their actual hard earned money for what they don't receive.
There was a lot of potential in this non movie/short film which the film maker either didn't notice or chose to ignore. Understandably, (but in no way justfiably), it looks like it was made during the initial full blown lockdown period of the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic and as such there was a severe limitation on any production, but there could have been so much more, should the film maker have paced it and simply employed a few more creative elements to build the initially successfully induced tension before prematurely revealing the 'ghost' and silly ending.
It almost had as much potential as was achieved by The Blair Witch Project which relied upon long scenes of nothing but darkness to build its tension, and that was the highest grossing film in history for its comparitive initial outlay to return ratio(!), so that's an indication of how much the makers of this film really missed the boat with what this could have been.
Despite it being picked up by streaming service like the one earlier mentioned and thus aapparently made a ldegitmate 'movie' through their dubious classification regime, of which this wasn't the only deceptively scant, offending offering, instead of the film creating goodwill with its original quirkiness and clever economy of cast and setting, it caused me to feel like I'd been ripped off becase I was expecting a full length feature and not merely a 40 odd minute rush job which the poorly orchestrated travesty of amateur make up artistry saw this thing quickly become when it was brought to its sudden and utterly illogical end, much like a cheap, pulp horror comic storyline where the production team were clearly far more intereted in receiving their day's end paycheue than in any way providing the public with a satisfying story, I regret to say there's not much more to this film than a house supposedly abandoned (and yet the lawns were illogically meticulously maintained and the tinterior clean and tidy after apparently a rotting corpse was left to fester in the bedroom whilst murderous squatters, not noted for their conscientious adherence to exquisite home care regimes abused the space for 12 solid weeks yet left it looking like home help just dusted it) so, between that unbelievable number of elemental failures to convey truth and numerous pieces of clean white string that looked like they had just been cut from a ball of newly purchased twine and inexplicably stuck onto a mirror with a chunk of whatever bodily fluid was most immeditely accessible, just like the short and intriguing title, with this disappointment that's about all you're going to see.
I'm cancelling Amazon Prime in protest at their scurrilous practice of flogging 40 minute bombs as feature films, mainly because I don't believe anyone who elevates themselves on blocks of cash really is above the rest of society's expectations of what they ought to receive when watching a movie nor does this automatically see them inherit the right of arbiter of popular culture with the soverign right to reclassify short films as movies and thereby to ripoff those paying their actual hard earned money for what they don't receive.
At least it's better than Bad Ben
Decent short found footage with a very similar concept to Bad Ben, but with someone with at least some acting ability. There's nothing new to see here, but there are couple of well timed jolts. Not the worst way to kill 45 minutes.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe real name of the actor playing Chris Chambers is Joseph Mazzaferro.
- GaffesAt 34 mins when he's on his mobile phone, you can see he hasn't pressed dial, the icon is green, should be red.
- Générique farfeluJoseph Mazzaferro, who plays the protagonist "Filmmaker" character, is credited in the end credits as "Anonymous."
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Durée
- 45m
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant