ÉVALUATION IMDb
4,8/10
1,9 k
MA NOTE
Peter et sa soeur Verity, anxieux, sont emmenés sous terre par une garnison de pangolins en armure.Peter et sa soeur Verity, anxieux, sont emmenés sous terre par une garnison de pangolins en armure.Peter et sa soeur Verity, anxieux, sont emmenés sous terre par une garnison de pangolins en armure.
Avis en vedette
Saved by the Ending, Dragged by the Dialogue
The Secret Kingdom tries so hard to summon that NeverEnding Story magic, but it swings with the earnest desperation of Casey at the bat... and misses just as hard. Like, ball's in the bleachers and Casey's spinning in the dirt.
From the outset, you can tell it wants to be a fantastical childhood quest with heart and depth. What we actually get is a CGI pangolin, magical rock politics, and dialogue so wooden I half-expected termites in the credits.
MVP? Verity. The little sister is the only one with real personality. She's the soul of the movie, even if the script hands her the occasional clunker. The rest of the cast is serviceable, but trapped in archetypes so thin they could be blown away by a sigh.
Runner-up? The kids going on a quest in their pajamas. Genuinely charming. Big Bedknobs and Broomsticks energy, or Arthur Dent in Narnia. It's the only time the movie brushes against whimsy and doesn't pull back in fear.
Production values are fine. Acting's decent. Worldbuilding feels like someone flipped open a fantasy name generator and called it lore. Plot? Bland. Stakes? Artificial. But...
...the ending. Somehow, miraculously, it lands. It made me feel something, and not just rage at wasted potential. It doesn't justify the full runtime, but it salvages the wreckage and sends you out on a grace note instead of a groan.
Final verdict: a film that tries way too hard, stumbles most of the way, but sticks the landing well enough to earn a polite golf clap.
Wouldn't recommend to everyone, but not a total waste either. I would not watch it again.
The Secret Kingdom tries so hard to summon that NeverEnding Story magic, but it swings with the earnest desperation of Casey at the bat... and misses just as hard. Like, ball's in the bleachers and Casey's spinning in the dirt.
From the outset, you can tell it wants to be a fantastical childhood quest with heart and depth. What we actually get is a CGI pangolin, magical rock politics, and dialogue so wooden I half-expected termites in the credits.
MVP? Verity. The little sister is the only one with real personality. She's the soul of the movie, even if the script hands her the occasional clunker. The rest of the cast is serviceable, but trapped in archetypes so thin they could be blown away by a sigh.
Runner-up? The kids going on a quest in their pajamas. Genuinely charming. Big Bedknobs and Broomsticks energy, or Arthur Dent in Narnia. It's the only time the movie brushes against whimsy and doesn't pull back in fear.
Production values are fine. Acting's decent. Worldbuilding feels like someone flipped open a fantasy name generator and called it lore. Plot? Bland. Stakes? Artificial. But...
...the ending. Somehow, miraculously, it lands. It made me feel something, and not just rage at wasted potential. It doesn't justify the full runtime, but it salvages the wreckage and sends you out on a grace note instead of a groan.
Final verdict: a film that tries way too hard, stumbles most of the way, but sticks the landing well enough to earn a polite golf clap.
Wouldn't recommend to everyone, but not a total waste either. I would not watch it again.
I don't know why these low ratings and reviews, it's a good movie for kids and adults
Is the reason for these low ratings that the movie did not contain the agenda of modernity and that it was kids movie that was innocent of everything they wanted to push us for?
The movie is not without flaws, but it was never a bad movie I loved it and recommend watching it Much better than many of the children's films produced by big production companies, which are no longer innocent films Very good film for the family to enjoy, Very good film for the family to enjoy, Very good film for the family to enjoy,
The movie is not without flaws, but it was never a bad movie I loved it and recommend watching it Much better than many of the children's films produced by big production companies, which are no longer innocent films Very good film for the family to enjoy, Very good film for the family to enjoy, Very good film for the family to enjoy,
The CGI is great given its an Australian film and not hollywood.
That said, the acting is bad. Cant really blame the kids though if the direction and editing falters too, which it does hilariously. Not only does the director fail to get his cast to put in some semblance of credibility, the editing dept too fails to get proper cuts in to keep the storyline fluid which inherently, also lacks depth and coherence.
The movie begins without any backstory or events leading up to the present, things start happening and before you know it, you are off riding on some creature's back(dragon?). In the end the story twists into an unexpected psychological tale wholly unrelated to preceding events. Basically its all an incredulous mix mashup of various stories told many times before only this time the director threw in everything into the stew all at once and forgot to stir the pot.
That said, the acting is bad. Cant really blame the kids though if the direction and editing falters too, which it does hilariously. Not only does the director fail to get his cast to put in some semblance of credibility, the editing dept too fails to get proper cuts in to keep the storyline fluid which inherently, also lacks depth and coherence.
The movie begins without any backstory or events leading up to the present, things start happening and before you know it, you are off riding on some creature's back(dragon?). In the end the story twists into an unexpected psychological tale wholly unrelated to preceding events. Basically its all an incredulous mix mashup of various stories told many times before only this time the director threw in everything into the stew all at once and forgot to stir the pot.
The comedy team "The Chaser" once said that we should preface all reviews of Australian films with "For an Australian Movie". Sadly, even with that preface, this movie still isn't good. Primarily, I really struggled with the acting which sounded like a crew from a local theatre group doing their first play. Special mention to the first scene in the curio shop, where the owner manages around 5 different accents in one line of dialogue! Surprisingly, the two child characters were actually some of the better actors. To be fair to the actors however, the script did them no favours with some painfully cheesy dialogue and scenes that were a collection of fantasy "the chosen one" tropes.
However it wasnt all awful, the CGI was solid and it had some sparks of fun especially in the second act of the movie early in the underground. It feels like a movie with significant potential that is never quite reached.
If you are at a loose end for an OK family movie and don't have many alternatives, then give the Secret Kingdom a try.. My kids (7 and 11) definitely enjoyed it more than the adults did.
However it wasnt all awful, the CGI was solid and it had some sparks of fun especially in the second act of the movie early in the underground. It feels like a movie with significant potential that is never quite reached.
If you are at a loose end for an OK family movie and don't have many alternatives, then give the Secret Kingdom a try.. My kids (7 and 11) definitely enjoyed it more than the adults did.
This is a kid's film. The CGI and special effects are good. The story has a fine moral-- about overcoming trauma and fear. It's not too full of itself, it's not silly, and the characters are enjoyable. I especially like the actress who played the sister; she did a fine job. The brother's acting seemed a little off, but he was playing the part of a child who was traumatized. Difficult part to play.
Adults should not watch a children's film and then rate it as if it's supposed to be for adults. This is for children. It's designed to catch and hold the attention of children, and hopefully teach them something in the process. This does so. To rate it 1 star or say it's the worst film ever is ridiculous and fueled more by ego and attitude than balanced reviewing. For the purpose it is intended, the film does well enough.
Adults should not watch a children's film and then rate it as if it's supposed to be for adults. This is for children. It's designed to catch and hold the attention of children, and hopefully teach them something in the process. This does so. To rate it 1 star or say it's the worst film ever is ridiculous and fueled more by ego and attitude than balanced reviewing. For the purpose it is intended, the film does well enough.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe character of Verity-played by Alyla Browne-has a name derived from the Latin word veritas, meaning truth. This fits thematically, as truth-uncovering it, accepting it, and confronting it-is a major focus of the film. Verity isn't just a name; it's a symbolic anchor.
- Citations
The Shroud: I Own You
Peter: No... I Own... *Me*!
- Générique farfeluAt the end of the credits Pling is seen practicing a hymn when he becomes aware the audience is still watching him at looks directly at the camera started they're still watching him
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Secret Kingdom?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 348 019 $ US
- Durée
- 1h 38m(98 min)
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant