Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueWhen tech billionaire Slater King meets cocktail waitress Frida at his fundraising gala, he invites her to join him and his friends on a dream vacation on his private island. As strange thin... Tout lireWhen tech billionaire Slater King meets cocktail waitress Frida at his fundraising gala, he invites her to join him and his friends on a dream vacation on his private island. As strange things start to happen, Frida questions her reality.When tech billionaire Slater King meets cocktail waitress Frida at his fundraising gala, he invites her to join him and his friends on a dream vacation on his private island. As strange things start to happen, Frida questions her reality.
- Prix
- 5 victoires et 22 nominations au total
Sommaire
Reviewers say 'Blink Twice' delves into power, manipulation, and female empowerment, reminiscent of 'Get Out' and 'Glass Onion'. The film's sinister island retreat narrative critiques wealth and privilege. Psychological tension and dark humor are highlighted, with praise for Naomi Ackie and Channing Tatum's performances. The ending is divisive, with mixed opinions on its satisfaction. Zoë Kravitz's direction and cinematography are lauded, though script and character development receive criticism. Overall, 'Blink Twice' is an ambitious film with a compelling premise and mixed execution.
Avis en vedette
The end really didn't do it for me.
I really was engaged with this movie for 95% of the ride and then the last couple of moments felt like.... A different story and point entirely.
I am still thinking about it and trying to reconcile in my mind why did they end it that way? It does not seem like the intention or maybe the general message of the rest of the film.
Is the ending supposed to be a statement of society, or a fantasy that we were supposed to be excited about? I don't know. It seemed contrived and trying to be edgy and I just wish something more practical happened with our main characters.
That ending wasn't justice. And it wasn't empowering. It was unsettling.
Reguardles, this film may make you really feel some intense emotions, as you figure out what is going on and I think they executed that very well. Everyone in this acted in a way that really impressed me and showed a lot of intent with just their body language in many scenes. I felt a lot more than I heard, and that was a very immersive experience.
I would have given this movie a 9, if it weren't for that ending. And I hope there one day is some other cut released that has almost anything else happening to these 2 main characters. It seems so out of place and fast, it makes you think it was merely an interchangeable afterthought, to what was a really interesting story and plot (during the majority of the movie) .
I really was engaged with this movie for 95% of the ride and then the last couple of moments felt like.... A different story and point entirely.
I am still thinking about it and trying to reconcile in my mind why did they end it that way? It does not seem like the intention or maybe the general message of the rest of the film.
Is the ending supposed to be a statement of society, or a fantasy that we were supposed to be excited about? I don't know. It seemed contrived and trying to be edgy and I just wish something more practical happened with our main characters.
That ending wasn't justice. And it wasn't empowering. It was unsettling.
Reguardles, this film may make you really feel some intense emotions, as you figure out what is going on and I think they executed that very well. Everyone in this acted in a way that really impressed me and showed a lot of intent with just their body language in many scenes. I felt a lot more than I heard, and that was a very immersive experience.
I would have given this movie a 9, if it weren't for that ending. And I hope there one day is some other cut released that has almost anything else happening to these 2 main characters. It seems so out of place and fast, it makes you think it was merely an interchangeable afterthought, to what was a really interesting story and plot (during the majority of the movie) .
This film was good. Enjoyable but hard not to keep thinking about the "client list" of Epsteins island. Imagine who's on it. This movie gives insight to that.... Anybody and everybody...people are truly sick and this movie does not land far from many truths. See it for yourself. I enjoyed the slower pacing as you watch the story slowly unfold like a blooming flower. I usually don't care for Canning Tatum but he wasn't bad in this. I think Zoe's first effort was solid but hopefully she will continue to hone her craft. Curious to see what she does next. This film isn't perfect but was not a waste of time.
First off, for a first time director, Zoe Kravitz has done very well. The film keeps everything interesting and goes along at a good pace.
Channing Tatum (being on the poster) is the draw for the audience. Especially, one that without him may not ultimately get a look in. He does a very competent job.
The sexual violence - there is a disclaimer at the start. That disclaimer, from what I saw in another review, is apparently a hint at what you should expect and the reviewer seemed disappointed that the sexual violence wasn't more graphic.
To address the issue, I personally didn't need to see that. For a few reasons, primarily this is NOT a film locking your head in position to confront you with the ugly reality of how sexual violence is perpetrated. We can gather that it's not good. We know.
What this film is primarily about psychological thriller. And we have seen films (not necessary addressing the issue at hand) like this across the decades. Pacey thrillers where you want the goody to outwit the evil baddy. And to that end, this does a very good job. It reveals the plot at a reasonable pace.
I don't want to spoilt the plot so I haven't talked about it. The trailer tells you what you need but ideally go into this not knowing anything.
You may even figure out the ending but even then it produces a twist to it all (albeit one that may counter the issues at hand).
This a metaphor for societies' ills with men who abuse women. And as such, we know in real life the awful things that happen. This film is simply packaging that as a thriller and providing a possible way to mitigate these ills even if the final turn is a little...imo....problematic.
You will enjoy this if you after a good night in and looking for a pacey thriller.
It is a lot better than some other thrillers I have seen recently.
If you're after extreme violence and horror, I suspect you will be disappointed.
Think more "Get Out" than say "Irreversible". Both great films, just different levels of violence.
Anyway, personally, I enjoyed it and it wasn't too overlong.
Channing Tatum (being on the poster) is the draw for the audience. Especially, one that without him may not ultimately get a look in. He does a very competent job.
The sexual violence - there is a disclaimer at the start. That disclaimer, from what I saw in another review, is apparently a hint at what you should expect and the reviewer seemed disappointed that the sexual violence wasn't more graphic.
To address the issue, I personally didn't need to see that. For a few reasons, primarily this is NOT a film locking your head in position to confront you with the ugly reality of how sexual violence is perpetrated. We can gather that it's not good. We know.
What this film is primarily about psychological thriller. And we have seen films (not necessary addressing the issue at hand) like this across the decades. Pacey thrillers where you want the goody to outwit the evil baddy. And to that end, this does a very good job. It reveals the plot at a reasonable pace.
I don't want to spoilt the plot so I haven't talked about it. The trailer tells you what you need but ideally go into this not knowing anything.
You may even figure out the ending but even then it produces a twist to it all (albeit one that may counter the issues at hand).
This a metaphor for societies' ills with men who abuse women. And as such, we know in real life the awful things that happen. This film is simply packaging that as a thriller and providing a possible way to mitigate these ills even if the final turn is a little...imo....problematic.
You will enjoy this if you after a good night in and looking for a pacey thriller.
It is a lot better than some other thrillers I have seen recently.
If you're after extreme violence and horror, I suspect you will be disappointed.
Think more "Get Out" than say "Irreversible". Both great films, just different levels of violence.
Anyway, personally, I enjoyed it and it wasn't too overlong.
This is mainly due to:
Adria Arjona is the secret star of the movie - in my opinion. She looks stunning and plays the funniest scenes in the movie.
Basically, there are some "Saltburn" vibes (the rich invite the normal people to a non-stop party time, separated from the rest of the world) and some "Get Out" vibes. (Something seems wrong here).
The soundtrack is also really nice.
An absolutely brilliant choice of music, mainly soul/funk/Disco. Rufus with Chaka Khan, James Brown, and more.
And the movie is funny. It's almost a comedy, even though it's actually a brutal mystery thriller.
I recommend checking out this little gem. Don't listen to the extremely negative reviews. Haters gonna hate.
- the very good actors, who are
Adria Arjona is the secret star of the movie - in my opinion. She looks stunning and plays the funniest scenes in the movie.
- and the story, which keeps you interested in how all of this is going to play out.
Basically, there are some "Saltburn" vibes (the rich invite the normal people to a non-stop party time, separated from the rest of the world) and some "Get Out" vibes. (Something seems wrong here).
The soundtrack is also really nice.
An absolutely brilliant choice of music, mainly soul/funk/Disco. Rufus with Chaka Khan, James Brown, and more.
And the movie is funny. It's almost a comedy, even though it's actually a brutal mystery thriller.
I recommend checking out this little gem. Don't listen to the extremely negative reviews. Haters gonna hate.
Stylish and promising. But fails to deliver. It falls into the emerging niche of "all is not what it seems...twist...white people are bad". Wish is disappointing. The premise has so much potential before trying to engage in some social justice tropes. To the point where the pacing gets thrown off. The first hour is non-eventful and overblown. There's a decent attempt at building an ominous sense of foreboding. But it just fails to deliver in the finale with end result feeling very rushed and underdeveloped.
The film is undoubtedly stylish, beautifully shot with some good performances. But it ultimately falls short.
The film is undoubtedly stylish, beautifully shot with some good performances. But it ultimately falls short.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesZoë Kravitz started writing Blink Twice under the original working title Pussy Island in 2017. Kravitz intended on keeping this title for the film but a negative reception from the MPAA, women, and theaters led to her change it.
- GaffesBoa constrictors aren't venomous so they couldn't have made snake venom liquor from it. The snake was actually a venomous viper.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Late Night with Seth Meyers: Channing Tatum/Sabrina Ionescu (2024)
- Bandes originalesPaid the Cost to Be Boss (The Boss)
Written by Charles Bobbitt, James Brown & Fred Wesley
Performed by James Brown
Courtesy of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Music Inc.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Blink Twice?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Blink Twice
- Lieux de tournage
- Yucatán, Mexique(Location)
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 20 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 23 093 906 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 7 301 894 $ US
- 25 août 2024
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 48 093 906 $ US
- Durée
- 1h 42m(102 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant