ÉVALUATION IMDb
5,6/10
15 k
MA NOTE
Un journaliste américain et son caméraman se retrouvent pris au milieu des feux croisés des armées russe et géorgienne, lors du conflit qui les a opposés, cinq jours durant, en août 2008.Un journaliste américain et son caméraman se retrouvent pris au milieu des feux croisés des armées russe et géorgienne, lors du conflit qui les a opposés, cinq jours durant, en août 2008.Un journaliste américain et son caméraman se retrouvent pris au milieu des feux croisés des armées russe et géorgienne, lors du conflit qui les a opposés, cinq jours durant, en août 2008.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
Rade Serbedzija
- Col. Alexandr Demidov
- (as Rade Sherbedgia)
Ana Imnadze
- Sofi Meddevi
- (as Ani Imnadze)
Kenneth Cranham
- Michael Stilton
- (as Ken Cranham)
Avis en vedette
Its not propaganda, its sad that russians hate themselfs that much that they give 1 star to the truth, like chernobyl. 1 Stars becouse they bealive that russian propaganda.
"We came here to cover a war, if we don't get a story this will all unfold unseen." This is an emotional and sometimes tense movie about reporters in Georgia during the war with Russia. Thomas Anders (Friend) is an American journalist sent to document the growing tension between the two countries. When war breaks out it is up to him to report and get the truth out. This is a movie that is pretty moving and tense, but also very slow. A mix between battle scenes and the reporters dodging bullets trying to stay alive long enough to get the story out to the rest of the world. If you like movies like the "Bang-Bang Club" this will very much appeal to you. I did enjoy this movie, but it seemed like it was just not quite as good as it could have been. The cast was great and it was a very good movie, but it had the possibility of being better. I'm not sure what it needed though. Overall, a good movie that could have been better. I give it a B-.
*Also try - Bang Bang Club
*Also try - Bang Bang Club
but a primitive story is too much of one-sided pro-Georgian propaganda.
Good Georgians, bad Russians and nothing in the middle.
Well, AFAIK Georgian government sponsored production so it wasn't for free.
Don't try to learn the history of the conflict after that.
Cold War is back. Seems like Rembo from the 80s but lacks Silvester to save the day.
On the other hand it doesn't look like a typical B-movie it could be considering it's screenplay.
Director's work is good, acting is not too bad. Special effects is nice too excluding cheap gasoline explosions.
Worth watching anyway.
Good Georgians, bad Russians and nothing in the middle.
Well, AFAIK Georgian government sponsored production so it wasn't for free.
Don't try to learn the history of the conflict after that.
Cold War is back. Seems like Rembo from the 80s but lacks Silvester to save the day.
On the other hand it doesn't look like a typical B-movie it could be considering it's screenplay.
Director's work is good, acting is not too bad. Special effects is nice too excluding cheap gasoline explosions.
Worth watching anyway.
Based on fact, I'm not familiar with the actual events, and therefore cannot comment on the film's accuracy on the matter.
Regardless, despite mostly negative reviews from critics, I enjoyed '5 Days of War'. I found it very exciting from an entertainment perspective. The film's action sequences are visually stunning. To add to this, the cinematography and photography are also really good.
Rupert Friend stars as a reporter, who lost his girlfriend on a previous mission. Moving on, he is once again on a mission to find the perfect story. Val Kilmer stars as his informant, Dutchman. Along for the ride is his friend and cameraman, Sebastian (Richard Coyle). There's a hint at a love interest here in the form of Tatia (Emmanuelle Chriqui), which - fortunately - never develops. The result is a film that is fast-paced, concentrating only on the events around the war.
I didn't find Andy Garcia believable as President Mikheil Saakashvili - not his accent, nor his performance. I think this was the only element about the movie I didn't like. The film illustrates the danger reporters face for the sake of a story, and also shows the horrors and brutalities of war. There are a few disturbing scenes. Considering the actual war in Georgia on which the movie is based, its unbelievable to think only five days caused so much death, destruction and mayhem...
I've watched '5 Days of War' a few times already and enjoy it every time.
Would I watch it again? Yes.
Regardless, despite mostly negative reviews from critics, I enjoyed '5 Days of War'. I found it very exciting from an entertainment perspective. The film's action sequences are visually stunning. To add to this, the cinematography and photography are also really good.
Rupert Friend stars as a reporter, who lost his girlfriend on a previous mission. Moving on, he is once again on a mission to find the perfect story. Val Kilmer stars as his informant, Dutchman. Along for the ride is his friend and cameraman, Sebastian (Richard Coyle). There's a hint at a love interest here in the form of Tatia (Emmanuelle Chriqui), which - fortunately - never develops. The result is a film that is fast-paced, concentrating only on the events around the war.
I didn't find Andy Garcia believable as President Mikheil Saakashvili - not his accent, nor his performance. I think this was the only element about the movie I didn't like. The film illustrates the danger reporters face for the sake of a story, and also shows the horrors and brutalities of war. There are a few disturbing scenes. Considering the actual war in Georgia on which the movie is based, its unbelievable to think only five days caused so much death, destruction and mayhem...
I've watched '5 Days of War' a few times already and enjoy it every time.
Would I watch it again? Yes.
It's kind of unsettling reading some indignant reviews written in 2011 by people who described this movie as "shameful anti-Russian propaganda".
Fast forward to this wretched June 2022, after over 100 days of Russians waging war against Ukraine and you know that the Russians did everything showed in the movie and some more.
Apart from showing the aggressive, merciless attitude of the Russian and the tragic results, especially tragic when you hear the people interviewed at the end, the plot must necessarily focus on a small story, otherwise it would have been a documentary.
Rupert Friend is Thomas, the tough and silent war reporter caught in the Georgian-Russian conflict with his operator Sebastian and some locals, among which a pretty young girls named Tatia. Those who watched Homeland probably remember the attack launched by mistake against a group reunited for a wedding and here we have a re-run along the same lines that sets the plot in motion, which is perhaps not too wise.
Other defects of the script are the silly chess game between Thomas and a Russian commander and the usual evil and brutal antagonist bent on his personal revenge, which in the chaotic scenario of the movie seems very far fetched.
Apart from some over sentimental touch, the movie is more than ever a chilly reminder of disaster that may strike at any moment. Perhaps not the best war movie but realistic enough.
Fast forward to this wretched June 2022, after over 100 days of Russians waging war against Ukraine and you know that the Russians did everything showed in the movie and some more.
Apart from showing the aggressive, merciless attitude of the Russian and the tragic results, especially tragic when you hear the people interviewed at the end, the plot must necessarily focus on a small story, otherwise it would have been a documentary.
Rupert Friend is Thomas, the tough and silent war reporter caught in the Georgian-Russian conflict with his operator Sebastian and some locals, among which a pretty young girls named Tatia. Those who watched Homeland probably remember the attack launched by mistake against a group reunited for a wedding and here we have a re-run along the same lines that sets the plot in motion, which is perhaps not too wise.
Other defects of the script are the silly chess game between Thomas and a Russian commander and the usual evil and brutal antagonist bent on his personal revenge, which in the chaotic scenario of the movie seems very far fetched.
Apart from some over sentimental touch, the movie is more than ever a chilly reminder of disaster that may strike at any moment. Perhaps not the best war movie but realistic enough.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe Georgian military supplied ground force, armored vehicles, weapons and helicopters for use in the film. This allowed many battle scenes and crowd formations to be staged without the need to expand or supplement them digitally.
- GaffesNews announcer quotes Vladimir Putin that "the loss Georgia was a major geopolitical tragedy of the twentieth century" (apparently meaning the South Ossetian War 1991-'92). Putin has never said that. In fact, in 2005, he referred to collapse of the Soviet Union the main geopolitical tragedy of the twentieth century.
- Autres versionsIn Polish release, music from ending credits was replaced by fragments of Lech Kaczynski's speech from Tbilisi in 2008. Additionally, Polish version was dedicated to Kaczynski.
- ConnexionsReferences American Idol: The Search for a Superstar (2002)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is 5 Days of War?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- 5 Días de Guerra
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 12 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 17 479 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 6 254 $ US
- 21 août 2011
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 316 944 $ US
- Durée
- 1h 53m(113 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant