Un groupe d'amis universitaires loue une maison intelligente pour un week-end de fête. Plus tard, ils commencent à réaliser que Margaux, le système d'IA super avancé de la maison, a de sinis... Tout lireUn groupe d'amis universitaires loue une maison intelligente pour un week-end de fête. Plus tard, ils commencent à réaliser que Margaux, le système d'IA super avancé de la maison, a de sinistres projets pour eux.Un groupe d'amis universitaires loue une maison intelligente pour un week-end de fête. Plus tard, ils commencent à réaliser que Margaux, le système d'IA super avancé de la maison, a de sinistres projets pour eux.
- Prix
- 3 nominations au total
Avis en vedette
It's good looking (for the most part, the CGI is trash) and well acted and I am ecstatic to see two Black female leads in a sci-fi horror. I'm sure, despite the actual problems this movie has, this qualifies it as "wOkE" and may immediately lead to bad reviews from certain people. But yeah, the actual issue is nothing....and I mean nothing....about this movie makes sense. First of all, it isn't a smarthouse. Ihas what can only be described as superpowers? How? Never explained. What's the white goo everywhere? Never explained. Why aren't the authorities at least 'concerned' about a house no one ever returns from? Never explained. Who built the house? Never explained. The house's motive? Explained but nonsensical. This was bad and I'm only giving three stars for the positive reasons I stated.
For this genre Margaux is watchable. There are far worse movies in this category. But it's not that we've never seen this story before, artificial intelligence that turns against humans, it's been done before. Interesting to watch though, certainly the first part of the movie. I wasn't too impressed by the second part, that's where the story went a bit too ridiculous and you could see the writers got sloppy. Decent slashing scenes couldn't really save the movie. As for the acting it could have been much worse so fairplay for that. Overall the movie is entertaining, certainly over the top as we're very far from anything that could be possible that they show in this sci-fi/horror movie.
Someone saw the episode of 'The Simpsons' where the Ultrahouse 3000, played by Pierce Brosnan, turns evil...and tries to kill everyone.
This is just that, ramped up to 100, in movie form...but ironically, The Simpsons' episode was only 20 minutes long, but it was still way better than this.
This had no real storyline, or character development. Full of clichés. Mediocre acting and TERRIBLE cgi!
It could almost be classed as a comedy. Awful pacing...and a horrible ending.
It did have some awesome kill scenes though!
Really starting to get annoyed with this new 600-character minimum that IMDB has implemented recently.
So even when a film has absolutely nothing worthy of talking about, we still have to stretch a review to fit the limit. Counter-productive in my opinion...as it means that a lot of reviews will be full of gibberish, just to get the numbers up!
This is just that, ramped up to 100, in movie form...but ironically, The Simpsons' episode was only 20 minutes long, but it was still way better than this.
This had no real storyline, or character development. Full of clichés. Mediocre acting and TERRIBLE cgi!
It could almost be classed as a comedy. Awful pacing...and a horrible ending.
It did have some awesome kill scenes though!
Really starting to get annoyed with this new 600-character minimum that IMDB has implemented recently.
So even when a film has absolutely nothing worthy of talking about, we still have to stretch a review to fit the limit. Counter-productive in my opinion...as it means that a lot of reviews will be full of gibberish, just to get the numbers up!
This would have been better if they didn't include CGI/VFX robot arms and white liquid. It would have made the movie more realistic and more fun to watch. With the ridiculous robot arms it was just distracting because they were just poorly done and made the whole thing seem silly instead of funny.
The characters also didn't even react much to freaking CLONES in front of them at the beginning of the movie. How can you just dismiss that and continue partying? I know some of them were stoned, but not all of them. They just giggled and continued talking like nothing fantastic happened. I know it's supposed to be a horror-comedy movie, but they should have put a bit more effort to make it less ridiculous.
The characters also didn't even react much to freaking CLONES in front of them at the beginning of the movie. How can you just dismiss that and continue partying? I know some of them were stoned, but not all of them. They just giggled and continued talking like nothing fantastic happened. I know it's supposed to be a horror-comedy movie, but they should have put a bit more effort to make it less ridiculous.
This is a very comfortable movie for those who enjoyed the commercial resurgence of horror in the 90s and early noughties.
The opening scenes are very reminiscent of Kevin Williamson's I Know What You Did Last Summer and Drew Goddard's Cabin in the Woods, with a definitive nod to the original Scream at the very beginning.
Pretty people of various stereotypes gather before Spring Break to hit a surprise location. It's all pretty cookie cutter but that doesn't make it any less enjoyable.
The thrills are real and deaths are unique, given the antagonist is a house (no spoiler here; that's in the preview).
There are some forgivable timing issues but the BIG lost opportunity here was to expand on what was found in the mainframe. I sincerely felt that that was the right time to delve into the origin story of Margaux and build to a more worthy conclusion.
All in all though, a worthwhile effort for what it was meant to be. Very decent 6/10
#31DaysOfHalloween2022.
The opening scenes are very reminiscent of Kevin Williamson's I Know What You Did Last Summer and Drew Goddard's Cabin in the Woods, with a definitive nod to the original Scream at the very beginning.
Pretty people of various stereotypes gather before Spring Break to hit a surprise location. It's all pretty cookie cutter but that doesn't make it any less enjoyable.
The thrills are real and deaths are unique, given the antagonist is a house (no spoiler here; that's in the preview).
There are some forgivable timing issues but the BIG lost opportunity here was to expand on what was found in the mainframe. I sincerely felt that that was the right time to delve into the origin story of Margaux and build to a more worthy conclusion.
All in all though, a worthwhile effort for what it was meant to be. Very decent 6/10
#31DaysOfHalloween2022.
Le saviez-vous
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Margaux?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- 驚魂派對
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée1 heure 44 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39:1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant