Rebel Moon - Partie 1: Enfant du feu
Titre original : Rebel Moon - Part One: A Child of Fire
Une jeune femme cherche des guerriers d'autres planètes pour combattre les armées tyranniques qui terrorisent sa paisible colonie.Une jeune femme cherche des guerriers d'autres planètes pour combattre les armées tyranniques qui terrorisent sa paisible colonie.Une jeune femme cherche des guerriers d'autres planètes pour combattre les armées tyranniques qui terrorisent sa paisible colonie.
- Prix
- 2 victoires et 4 nominations au total
Anthony Hopkins
- Jimmy
- (voice)
Ingvar Sigurdsson
- Hagen
- (as Ingvar Sigurðsson)
Elise Duffy
- Milius
- (as E. Duffy)
Avis en vedette
Like many others I was hoping for something good and a bit different and felt a bit let down. I found it lost itself in connection, there just seemed to be something missing however I now know what was missing and what was missing was literally half the movie. I decided to watch the directors cut out of curiosity as I felt it may have added what I felt was missing and wow just like magic it all seemed so much better and made a lot more sense almost like it was an entirely different movie with some character and story background. I think the short version was an attempt at trying to cater to a commercial audience but in reality the long version should have just been the original. Much better 7-6 stars for the editors cut but only 4-4 for the original. Although it's much better, still lacking something.
Watching this film, it felt like it was created by committee and written for an audience that the director thinks is not particularly clever.
There were so many elements in this that seemed like they had been added because someone thought "hey wouldn't it be cool if there was a... *cool flying bird you can ride* or *a bar scene that looks like the one in Star Wars*
The script also needed some work. The parts of the story were just thrown in as backstory or someone explaining the bleeding obvious. A little more respect shown for the audience would have allowed us to know some of that through watching, understanding or less didactic dialogue.
On the plus side, it looks great. Visually there is always great depth and detail. I enjoyed it enough to want to see the next one, although I suspect my guesses about major plot developments will be correct.
There were so many elements in this that seemed like they had been added because someone thought "hey wouldn't it be cool if there was a... *cool flying bird you can ride* or *a bar scene that looks like the one in Star Wars*
The script also needed some work. The parts of the story were just thrown in as backstory or someone explaining the bleeding obvious. A little more respect shown for the audience would have allowed us to know some of that through watching, understanding or less didactic dialogue.
On the plus side, it looks great. Visually there is always great depth and detail. I enjoyed it enough to want to see the next one, although I suspect my guesses about major plot developments will be correct.
Hello,
Like evreyone who reads this (sorry i'm french and yes I hated Raygun), finally we have Zach Snyder. I saw his first cut and was unimpressed (hated the first version, too disney like for me).
But, his director's cut, the decription and details of the characters has finally caught up to me. I mean, we did not have any ulteriors or superiors motives for any characters and it was a pain in the neck. But with the director's cut, finally we can relate. Regarding the "violent" scene, finally we left Disney and went for a more "gore" approach (everyone has its limit). Personnaly, it wasn't gore enough knowing Snyder past work. However, the character evolution was spot on. Basically, watch the director's cut, it is so much better than the original one.
Like evreyone who reads this (sorry i'm french and yes I hated Raygun), finally we have Zach Snyder. I saw his first cut and was unimpressed (hated the first version, too disney like for me).
But, his director's cut, the decription and details of the characters has finally caught up to me. I mean, we did not have any ulteriors or superiors motives for any characters and it was a pain in the neck. But with the director's cut, finally we can relate. Regarding the "violent" scene, finally we left Disney and went for a more "gore" approach (everyone has its limit). Personnaly, it wasn't gore enough knowing Snyder past work. However, the character evolution was spot on. Basically, watch the director's cut, it is so much better than the original one.
I wanted this to be good so badly. Like really badly.
Other than the world design and effects, there really isn't much else to salvage from it.
In true Snyder style we've got lens flare and slow motion, but this time he's dialled it up over the top.
Some of the action scenes are absolutely ruined from way too much diving in and out of slow motion.
The biggest disappointment is the writing.
The first 70% of the film is absolutely a waste of time and not needed.
You don't find out most of the characters actual relevance until the back end of the film.
Everything before that is a mixture of utterly pointless painfully boring scenes done for the sole purpose of filler.
Looks great, but that's all.
Other than the world design and effects, there really isn't much else to salvage from it.
In true Snyder style we've got lens flare and slow motion, but this time he's dialled it up over the top.
Some of the action scenes are absolutely ruined from way too much diving in and out of slow motion.
The biggest disappointment is the writing.
The first 70% of the film is absolutely a waste of time and not needed.
You don't find out most of the characters actual relevance until the back end of the film.
Everything before that is a mixture of utterly pointless painfully boring scenes done for the sole purpose of filler.
Looks great, but that's all.
It is all over the place. No character connection. Vulgar scenes to force emotions. Weird cheap cocktail of Star Wars and Dune. Felt like fan-made university project with a multi-million budget that was only spend on slow motion CGI scenes. I doubt that the extended edition will have more movie magic since this one already fails in every sense.
Not even the world-building or the design felt worth watching since it felt like the characters were in costumes rather than authentic dresses. No scene composition gave the feeling of a profound world with deep history.
Too many unoriginal ideas that were thrown together with the hope of "Let's hope it will be the next movie success".
I wouldn't say that the actors were weak, rather the error or lack of writers in the writing process of the movie show how important dialogue, character building arcs and real emotional value are in movies rather than gross tasteless blood baths, torture, explosions and one-dimensional characters.
Not even the world-building or the design felt worth watching since it felt like the characters were in costumes rather than authentic dresses. No scene composition gave the feeling of a profound world with deep history.
Too many unoriginal ideas that were thrown together with the hope of "Let's hope it will be the next movie success".
I wouldn't say that the actors were weak, rather the error or lack of writers in the writing process of the movie show how important dialogue, character building arcs and real emotional value are in movies rather than gross tasteless blood baths, torture, explosions and one-dimensional characters.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesZack Snyder first conceived this as a Star Wars movie, and pitched it to Lucasfilm shortly after it was bought by Disney in 2012, but it never got off the ground.
- GaffesThe shape of the floating platform on Gondival [at 1:52:00] changes depending on where it is viewed from. When Noble lands on it, and later Kora (and all shots from above, and of their fight) it is octagonal, or eight-sided - i.e. five edges are often in the shot, two of which are parallel; but in all the shots from underneath (as when Kora falls over the edge) it is shown as hexagonal, or six-sided; however it cannot be both.
- Autres versionsOn August 2nd, 2024, Netflix released an R-rated director's cut of the film, titled Rebel Moon - Part One: Chalice of Blood. This version runs for 205 minutes (3h 25m) and features more violence, language and sexuality which were removed from A Child of Fire.
- Bandes originalesThunderous
Written and Performed by Diego Stocco
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Rebel Moon - Part One: A Child of Fire
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 90 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Durée2 heures 13 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant