Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA woman's obsessive search for her missing sister leads her into a terrifying mystery at the hands of an unknown evil.A woman's obsessive search for her missing sister leads her into a terrifying mystery at the hands of an unknown evil.A woman's obsessive search for her missing sister leads her into a terrifying mystery at the hands of an unknown evil.
- Réalisation
- Scénaristes
- Vedettes
Sloane Burkett
- Young Riley
- (as Sloane Harlow Burkett)
5,57.3K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Avis en vedette
Disappointingly Rote
I don't care for Chris Stuckman's YouTube presence or for most of those influencer folks because rarely do they set their subjective bias aside when talking about movies, but I was immediately intrigued by his feature film debut because Mike Flanagan is an EP and the indie circuit buzz was exciting. Having finally seen it, it's not an impressive film.
The first half is thoroughly captivating as we're pulled into a bizarre mystery that defies reason, but the second half is just a hodgepodge of horror cliches and missteps. It's worth a look for hardcore horror fans, but otherwise, Shelby Oaks isn't a must-see in any regard.
The first half is thoroughly captivating as we're pulled into a bizarre mystery that defies reason, but the second half is just a hodgepodge of horror cliches and missteps. It's worth a look for hardcore horror fans, but otherwise, Shelby Oaks isn't a must-see in any regard.
Nice try but nope
This review is following a screening from Fantasia Festival and I realize that this is a first feature film and Chris seems like a nice guy but this was amateur hour.
I'll start with the positives, the cinematography was excellent and the lead actress was for the most part pretty credible. This film also had a promising prologue, although mostly riffing on Blair witch projects premise. Finally Keith David classed the joint up in a small role.
On the negative side, the relationship with the husband and lead was beyond poorly written, with a poorly acted argument sticking out in my memory. I was stunned when I was advised the husband is a working actor with many credits to his name.
The worst sin is that it's a horror film that just isn't scary, relying on cheap jumpscares and poor cgi dogs. The third act and ending also leave much to be desired where the audience was audibly laughing at what I would think were serious moments. The abysmal ending left me ambivalent rather than shocked as I imagine Chris intended. The biggest ruse is that this has been picked up for distribution, I can't see an average audience unfamiliar with Chris' YouTube career connecting with this film.
I'll start with the positives, the cinematography was excellent and the lead actress was for the most part pretty credible. This film also had a promising prologue, although mostly riffing on Blair witch projects premise. Finally Keith David classed the joint up in a small role.
On the negative side, the relationship with the husband and lead was beyond poorly written, with a poorly acted argument sticking out in my memory. I was stunned when I was advised the husband is a working actor with many credits to his name.
The worst sin is that it's a horror film that just isn't scary, relying on cheap jumpscares and poor cgi dogs. The third act and ending also leave much to be desired where the audience was audibly laughing at what I would think were serious moments. The abysmal ending left me ambivalent rather than shocked as I imagine Chris intended. The biggest ruse is that this has been picked up for distribution, I can't see an average audience unfamiliar with Chris' YouTube career connecting with this film.
This movie is a dud
I went to see Shelby Oaks on 10/24/25, which was the first day of its theatrical run. I was alone at my screening.
I went because I love horror. The movie's premise reads like something you'd read for any random horror movie on the Tubi app: a woman goes missing while she investigates the paranormal, and her sister tries to find her. It's an extremely basic, cliched, un-original premise for a horror. But I was fine with it because, again, I like horror (I even enjoy those Tubi original horror flicks even!)
But in the end, I hated this movie
There are so many issues that I can rattle off -- the first, which might be most conspicious, is that the lead actress is way too old for the role; she looks more like a distressed mother than a sister. She and her missing sister Riley look nothing alike. They do not pass as sisters
In addition - the movie has an awkward construction. It starts off in a documentary fashion, as if it were a found-footage film. Then when the main character Mia goes out to look for the missing sister, the documentary/found-footage perspective goes away entirely. This jump in presentation, from found-footage to conventional, is simply weird and puzzling; and I'm not sure what the point is. The movie could have easily been made as one or the other. It could've been told as a complete found-footage or a conventional movie.
Some of the plot details don't work. The girl had been missing for 12 years, and in spite of all the police work and publicity, nobody else could spot the details that Mia does when she watches her sister's old videos ... the character Mia has a husband who serves no purpose in the movie (infact, I actually think they should have scrapped his character entirely to give the sense that Mia had nobody else but her sister) ... when Mia goes out into the woods to look for her sister, she bizarrely goes out by herself. What happened to the documentary crew? That Mia is alone means that she wanders about in silence, which becomes a drag. Having someone to talk to might've made these scenes a bit more lively. I found myself yawning and getting restless during that part ... the movie's ending is unsatisfying
The only positive is that some scenes are visually well-done, and there's even one really creepy scene involving a photo album. But they're not enough to make up for the film's many shortcomings
3.5/10.
I went because I love horror. The movie's premise reads like something you'd read for any random horror movie on the Tubi app: a woman goes missing while she investigates the paranormal, and her sister tries to find her. It's an extremely basic, cliched, un-original premise for a horror. But I was fine with it because, again, I like horror (I even enjoy those Tubi original horror flicks even!)
But in the end, I hated this movie
There are so many issues that I can rattle off -- the first, which might be most conspicious, is that the lead actress is way too old for the role; she looks more like a distressed mother than a sister. She and her missing sister Riley look nothing alike. They do not pass as sisters
In addition - the movie has an awkward construction. It starts off in a documentary fashion, as if it were a found-footage film. Then when the main character Mia goes out to look for the missing sister, the documentary/found-footage perspective goes away entirely. This jump in presentation, from found-footage to conventional, is simply weird and puzzling; and I'm not sure what the point is. The movie could have easily been made as one or the other. It could've been told as a complete found-footage or a conventional movie.
Some of the plot details don't work. The girl had been missing for 12 years, and in spite of all the police work and publicity, nobody else could spot the details that Mia does when she watches her sister's old videos ... the character Mia has a husband who serves no purpose in the movie (infact, I actually think they should have scrapped his character entirely to give the sense that Mia had nobody else but her sister) ... when Mia goes out into the woods to look for her sister, she bizarrely goes out by herself. What happened to the documentary crew? That Mia is alone means that she wanders about in silence, which becomes a drag. Having someone to talk to might've made these scenes a bit more lively. I found myself yawning and getting restless during that part ... the movie's ending is unsatisfying
The only positive is that some scenes are visually well-done, and there's even one really creepy scene involving a photo album. But they're not enough to make up for the film's many shortcomings
3.5/10.
Ambitious but disappointing
Now before I begin, I want to say I enjoyed Chris Stuckmann's critic videos and works in the past. Having seen his reviews and talks about his upbringings in the vile Jehovah Witnesses cult was interesting. He seems like a chill person. Now for his first debut feature film, there are some good aspects, yet also not so great aspects.
Starters, the atmosphere and presentation is pretty good. With the tones of supernatural, mystery, found footage style and blended with paranoia themes, it helps add layers of tension within the setting and concept. Alongside with some solid special effects, production designs and camera work, there are some genuinely good moments of creepy sequences, atmospheres within the setting, and the colors too. Stuckmann's direction is decent, as he was able to capture the essence of the themes and balances pretty well. Alright admittedly, there are some direction chops that didn't land very well.
The performances are pretty solid. Camille Sullivan was really good, alongside with the rest of the cast members too. Unfortunately, the writing and execution causes the movie to prevent it from being good. First of all, the story and concept is good and the writing does offer some unique and fun horror ideas. But the issues is that it feels like Stuckmann struggles to blend the writing perfectly with what he wants to present. Because of that, the writing demonstrates a lot of horror cliches that are predictable and moments that feel messy. Which makes the characters of the movie hard to believe in nor engage.
Alongside with some annoying jump scares, the dialogue does feel wonky. As if the dialogue feels like something of a student film project does. On the effects, there are some good animal and blood effects, including sound designs. And the pacing is pretty solid.
At the end, I'm happy Chris Stuckmann is able to finally make his movie. He has talent for sure and I do like to see where he leads next. But, he really needs to get a better writer.
Starters, the atmosphere and presentation is pretty good. With the tones of supernatural, mystery, found footage style and blended with paranoia themes, it helps add layers of tension within the setting and concept. Alongside with some solid special effects, production designs and camera work, there are some genuinely good moments of creepy sequences, atmospheres within the setting, and the colors too. Stuckmann's direction is decent, as he was able to capture the essence of the themes and balances pretty well. Alright admittedly, there are some direction chops that didn't land very well.
The performances are pretty solid. Camille Sullivan was really good, alongside with the rest of the cast members too. Unfortunately, the writing and execution causes the movie to prevent it from being good. First of all, the story and concept is good and the writing does offer some unique and fun horror ideas. But the issues is that it feels like Stuckmann struggles to blend the writing perfectly with what he wants to present. Because of that, the writing demonstrates a lot of horror cliches that are predictable and moments that feel messy. Which makes the characters of the movie hard to believe in nor engage.
Alongside with some annoying jump scares, the dialogue does feel wonky. As if the dialogue feels like something of a student film project does. On the effects, there are some good animal and blood effects, including sound designs. And the pacing is pretty solid.
At the end, I'm happy Chris Stuckmann is able to finally make his movie. He has talent for sure and I do like to see where he leads next. But, he really needs to get a better writer.
Horror Trop
A film made to be watched at home. Many dark moments that allowed for the theater guide lighting to wash out the screen. Slow start that take found footage and then turns into a mystery movie only to end with a boring twist and unsatisfying ending. The only real thing that could save this movie is if the home video sleuths are able to frame by frame hidden clues throughout the film otherwise, don't waste your time. C horror film.
The Best New and Upcoming Horror
The Best New and Upcoming Horror
Sinister sequels, eerie indies, and blockbuster boo-fests — here are the most exciting horror movies and shows to add to your Watchlist.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe Kickstarter campaign for this film reached its initial funding goal of $250,000 within 24 hours. The initial stretchgoals (up to $600,000) were reached with 1,5 weeks of the campaign remaining, which prompted in the addition of further stretchgoals (up to $1,000,000) - which were also reached before the end of the campaign. When the campaign finished after one month, a total sum of $1,390,845 was pledged by 14,720 supporters - making it the most funded horror film on Kickstarter.
- Bandes originales'The Paranormal Paranoids' Theme
Written and Performed by Aaron J. Morton
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Shelby Oaks?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Shelby Oaks
- Lieux de tournage
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 1 400 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 4 500 051 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 2 346 918 $ US
- 26 oct. 2025
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 6 051 389 $ US
- Durée
- 1h 31m(91 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant







