Martin
- 2024
- 2h 27m
ÉVALUATION IMDb
2,2/10
36 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA journey of a man discovering himself, finding love and fighting for his motherland. Can he hold the fort on all three gates?A journey of a man discovering himself, finding love and fighting for his motherland. Can he hold the fort on all three gates?A journey of a man discovering himself, finding love and fighting for his motherland. Can he hold the fort on all three gates?
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Prix
- 2 nominations au total
Sommaire
Reviewers say 'Martin' faces criticism for its convoluted plot, poorly executed action sequences, and lackluster character development. The incoherent narrative, weak dialogue, and over-the-top action scenes are highlighted as major flaws. Technical aspects like CGI, sound design, and editing are frequently faulted. Pacing issues, either too slow or too rushed, further detract from the experience. Despite some praise for certain action sequences and performances, the overall consensus is that 'Martin' fails to offer a cohesive and enjoyable cinematic experience.
Avis en vedette
Absolute garbage. The film opens with an intriguing premise but quickly devolves into over-the-top action sequences and convoluted twists that many critics found difficult to follow. While Sarja's action performance is praised, especially in the high-octane fight scenes, the film's poor CGI, weak dialogue, and lackluster character development detract from its appeal. Critics have pointed out that despite the heavy budget and ambitious scope, the movie feels disjointed, with style overshadowing substance. The supporting cast, including Vaibhavi Shandilya and Anveshi Jain, is underutilized, and the romantic subplot feels tacked on. Technical aspects like the background score by Ravi Basrur have also been criticized for failing to enhance the film's dramatic moments. Don't waste your time and energy, now days indian is all about Pakistan is bad and india is good.
(Everything in this review is based on personal choice it's not a representation of the pure art made by makers,ie: don't sue me) If you don't know how bad it is let me just say ( give the tickets money to charity and use those 3 hours to think about your life.if the makers are bullying the review YouTubers you should know that they don't have good content and after watching this movie I think the makers need to find a new profession like selling fruits or vegetables or even buying scraps. The CGI was worse than my nephews favourite game minecraft and most importantly why was a dog being fed with mans lips.
Unnecessary intense scenes. Heavy background music now and then will make us get headache.
Direction is focused too much on boasting lead actor than focusing on story and message it was to deliver.
Not to blame the lead male and female characters for their over acting but the director himself for it.
He executes many scenes influenced by KGF/Kabja.
Very small story which could be delivered in good way is stretched with illogical scenes and unwanted scenes and finally everyone is lost. Director tried to make it look like Hollywood movie but completely end up delivering movie that look unoriginal and it's neither Indian nor western.
Direction is focused too much on boasting lead actor than focusing on story and message it was to deliver.
Not to blame the lead male and female characters for their over acting but the director himself for it.
He executes many scenes influenced by KGF/Kabja.
Very small story which could be delivered in good way is stretched with illogical scenes and unwanted scenes and finally everyone is lost. Director tried to make it look like Hollywood movie but completely end up delivering movie that look unoriginal and it's neither Indian nor western.
I have never seen such a worst movie like this in my entire life..
Story was decent that's it and there is nothing one positive point in this movie..
Direction - worst
Acting - cringe and artificial
Bgm - headache
Songs - extra headache
Lyrics - too bad
Dailogues - no words
VFX - Cartoon
Action choreography - routine
Cinematography - ok
Costumes - big salute to designer
The Hero Druva sarja Ds Boos is the main negative to movie, his performance cringe and so artificial..
And The director - completely failed to execute the story, kabza 100 times better than this, the brand AP Arjun Dodda namaskara🙏
The *2024* release of *Martin* is not a direct remake of George A. Romero's 1977 psychological horror but rather a restoration and re-release that has drawn attention in recent years. Over the decades, Romero's *Martin* has gained considerable recognition, with some critics and fans considering it a cult classic for its unconventional take on vampirism. Due to this, a 4K restoration of the original was announced to bring the film back to audiences, preserving its place in horror history.
As the 2024 version aims to preserve the essence of the original, it focuses on enhancing the quality of Romero's work, offering modern audiences a clearer and more vivid presentation of the gritty, disturbing world Martin inhabits. The restoration uses the original 16mm camera negative to bring the colors, cinematography, and atmosphere back to life while maintaining the film's raw, low-budget aesthetic, which is part of its appeal.
Romero's *Martin* stands out for its realistic and grounded approach to horror, diverging from more popular and romanticized interpretations of vampires. In a horror landscape that often relies on supernatural elements, Martin's story offers a psychological angle, leaving audiences to question whether he is a vampire at all or simply mentally ill. By 2024, this concept resonates even more with contemporary viewers, given the increased focus on mental health and its intersection with horror.
The story remains the same: Martin, a young man who believes he is an 84-year-old vampire, moves to Pittsburgh to live with his superstitious cousin Cuda, who sees him as a Nosferatu-like monster. The tension between Martin's modern skepticism and Cuda's old-world belief system is central to the film's drama. The visual restoration enhances this dynamic, sharpening the contrasts between Martin's bleak urban surroundings and the dreamlike black-and-white flashbacks that allude to his delusions of vampirism.
In the 2024 version, this restoration effort is paired with bonus content that delves deeper into Romero's creative process and the film's enduring legacy. Many fans of Romero's work will appreciate the effort to bring back one of his lesser-known films, offering a new generation the chance to experience *Martin* as close to the director's original vision as possible. This re-release also serves as an exploration of how the film's themes of alienation, violence, and identity remain relevant in today's society.
The restored *Martin* brings a unique experience for viewers seeking a blend of psychological tension and horror without the typical tropes.
As the 2024 version aims to preserve the essence of the original, it focuses on enhancing the quality of Romero's work, offering modern audiences a clearer and more vivid presentation of the gritty, disturbing world Martin inhabits. The restoration uses the original 16mm camera negative to bring the colors, cinematography, and atmosphere back to life while maintaining the film's raw, low-budget aesthetic, which is part of its appeal.
Romero's *Martin* stands out for its realistic and grounded approach to horror, diverging from more popular and romanticized interpretations of vampires. In a horror landscape that often relies on supernatural elements, Martin's story offers a psychological angle, leaving audiences to question whether he is a vampire at all or simply mentally ill. By 2024, this concept resonates even more with contemporary viewers, given the increased focus on mental health and its intersection with horror.
The story remains the same: Martin, a young man who believes he is an 84-year-old vampire, moves to Pittsburgh to live with his superstitious cousin Cuda, who sees him as a Nosferatu-like monster. The tension between Martin's modern skepticism and Cuda's old-world belief system is central to the film's drama. The visual restoration enhances this dynamic, sharpening the contrasts between Martin's bleak urban surroundings and the dreamlike black-and-white flashbacks that allude to his delusions of vampirism.
In the 2024 version, this restoration effort is paired with bonus content that delves deeper into Romero's creative process and the film's enduring legacy. Many fans of Romero's work will appreciate the effort to bring back one of his lesser-known films, offering a new generation the chance to experience *Martin* as close to the director's original vision as possible. This re-release also serves as an exploration of how the film's themes of alienation, violence, and identity remain relevant in today's society.
The restored *Martin* brings a unique experience for viewers seeking a blend of psychological tension and horror without the typical tropes.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Martin?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Durée
- 2h 27m(147 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39:1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant