Recherchant vengeance et justice, Cole Brandt se rend dans une ville sans foi ni loi, Dead River. Là, il se met au service de la protection d'un saloon et d'une magnifique femme...Recherchant vengeance et justice, Cole Brandt se rend dans une ville sans foi ni loi, Dead River. Là, il se met au service de la protection d'un saloon et d'une magnifique femme...Recherchant vengeance et justice, Cole Brandt se rend dans une ville sans foi ni loi, Dead River. Là, il se met au service de la protection d'un saloon et d'une magnifique femme...
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
Dan Buran
- Tug O'Dell
- (as Daniel Buran)
Veronica Milagros
- Dulce de la Rosa
- (as Veronica Diaz)
Robert Jensen
- Clay Stobbs
- (as Rob Jensen)
Allison O'Malley
- Cassey May
- (as Allison Gordon)
Audrey Ann Gambach
- Josie Belle
- (as Audrey Gambach)
Lou Pimber
- Johnny Brown
- (as Luis Pimber)
Avis en vedette
It was great to see a lower budget movie produced with attention to quality actors, quality costuming, quality sets, and even quality music. Yes the movie has some issues typical of a lower budget. You see sporadic problems with continuity and editing. And a few boo-boos with stunts and lighting. But those are sporadic. There's nothing so glaring to make you want to turn it off. The vision is clear from the beginning and despite a few oopsies it's a decent movie. I only wish the DVD cover floating around on Facebook had been used instead of the retro-art modern looking outlaw. At least you'd know what kind of western you are going to view (action and romance and morals)instead of a martial arts testosterone action only flick.
"If you had been under my command I'd have had you hung. I will never pay you a cent for protection." Travis McCain (Shockley) has taken over the town of Dead River and the people are living in fear. When Cole Brandt (Walker) comes in to town looking for revenge for the murderer of his wife and child he finds someone that needs to be taken care of. This is a movie where the plot and idea is much better then the movie was. While it had some really good scenes and action, it was just much, much to slow moving and hard to get into. The acting was not bad and it was decently made, it was just really tough to get into. If you are a hardcore western fan this till appeal to you, if you like an occasional one it would be better to go find a different one. Overall, not a bad movie just way to slow to fully keep you interested for the entire time. I give it a C-.
Would I watch again? - I barely made it through once. No
Would I watch again? - I barely made it through once. No
OK. Let me explain. This was such a good attempt. Some money's been spent, (not on the script, admittedly). It's been spent on some decent sets, a few actors, some (occasionally decent) cinematography.
And in these days, a straightforward Good-v-Evil western is refreshing, or, rather, SHOULD BE refreshing. And this tries hard. And (sadly) fails.
The storyline is OK, derivative, but modernised, and - well - OK, what can I say, it's just alright.
The acting's OK, pretty good, in parts. The hero, well, he's a hero. We are in NO DOUBT that he's a good guy.
The women are - well, women, really. The strong mother is OK, ('til the end bit, where she mainly screams and doesn't shoot anything), but mainly the women are pretty 2 dimensional, apart from the one who has so much plastic in her lips she looks like she has her mouth on upside down, and she disappears from the story in a really unconvincing way.
Oh, I don't know. I wanted to like this. I watched it to the end, (Parenthood meets Mum's Apple Pie), and I'm not left with an AWFUL taste in my mouth, just a bitter disappointment. It should have been better.
OK. To be honest? If the producer had hired a decent director, it would have been better.
And he also should have spent a few dollars on someone to direct his fight scenes. That last one is pretty bad.
But, OK, I gave it a 6 out of 10. Because it wasn't THAT bad. Just it should have, could have, been far better.
And in these days, a straightforward Good-v-Evil western is refreshing, or, rather, SHOULD BE refreshing. And this tries hard. And (sadly) fails.
The storyline is OK, derivative, but modernised, and - well - OK, what can I say, it's just alright.
The acting's OK, pretty good, in parts. The hero, well, he's a hero. We are in NO DOUBT that he's a good guy.
The women are - well, women, really. The strong mother is OK, ('til the end bit, where she mainly screams and doesn't shoot anything), but mainly the women are pretty 2 dimensional, apart from the one who has so much plastic in her lips she looks like she has her mouth on upside down, and she disappears from the story in a really unconvincing way.
Oh, I don't know. I wanted to like this. I watched it to the end, (Parenthood meets Mum's Apple Pie), and I'm not left with an AWFUL taste in my mouth, just a bitter disappointment. It should have been better.
OK. To be honest? If the producer had hired a decent director, it would have been better.
And he also should have spent a few dollars on someone to direct his fight scenes. That last one is pretty bad.
But, OK, I gave it a 6 out of 10. Because it wasn't THAT bad. Just it should have, could have, been far better.
For a western its the typical bad guys tear up a town and the good guy rides in to save the day. The town seems pretty small with only about 20 people in all but they seem to keep getting bad guys to pop up from everywhere. The editing is terrible, there's parts of the film where the fight scenes speed up and skip frames. The sets are nice and really believable, the one thing that isn't believable is the female "bad girl" named lulca or something like that. She has so much plastic surgery it makes her look out of place in the movie. Her lips are swelled and to big, she constantly looks like shes frowning. All in all it was fun to watch and helped pass the time, would I watch it again? would i recommend it to anyone? probably not.
Sometimes I read negative reviews on IMDB and AMAZON and wonder what planet some of the reviewers are on.
Not every film can have a budget of millions so it is not always fair to compare smaller indie films like this with the likes of the remake of The Magnificent Seven. But this is a cracking good western and if you like good action and fine performances in the old tradition of the western then this is for you.
I can tell you from personal experience that negative reviews without any positivity in them simply shows a lack of understanding.
We need more westerns like this to keep the genre alive and kicking!
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe movie set location is in Gammons Gulch, Arizona, in a specially constructed Western-style town for tourists and commercial enterprises. The saloon was newly built for the movie.
- GaffesWhen Travis McCain enters The Majestic Saloon at the beginning, he gives his gun up to Newman Hicks. A few seconds later, as he is walking up to Thomas Morgan's table, the gun can be seen in McCain's holster.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Gundown?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Durée1 heure 37 minutes
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant