7 Lives

Watched this film last night on love film Not a film to get excited about but worth a watch Seeing this a Danny dyer film straight to DVD like most he produces these days was big fan of his early films human traffic football factory etc and few Recents malice in wounderland I liked pretty much everything else he's done toilet So back to this one for a low budget b movie weren't bad Acting thought was good from each character plot was hard to understand he gets head kicked in changes from the attacked to attacker then from that body to a tramp and so on but never really answered any thing I found entertaining deffo till end but was no classic different role for Mr dyer yes but he a one trick pony who's never going to win many races

I watched this movie yesterday. Not a bad movie at all.

After the first 10 minutes or so, it catches your attention. In fact, you'll be asking yourself 'what is going on?' throughout most of the movie. It is a little confusing, perhaps watching it a second or a third time would answer a few questions. But I think (and most viewers too) I won't spend more time with, it is worth watching once, not more.

Different characters repeat the same phrases in different occasions, I couldn't help but compare this to 'Cloud Atlas', only in a different (much lower) level. Perhaps this adds some interest to the story, I think this makes it a little more confusing. See for yourself.

Overall, '7 Lives' is not a masterpiece, far from it, but it is watchable - if you have 99 minutes to spend.

Danny Dyer is getting worse by the minute. He was never an Al Pachino or Denzel Washington, but he was in some decent British movies back in the day that suited his personality/accent. Now he is trying act like he can "act" and staring in films with a budget of like £2.50 does not help either.

This film was bad, really bad and half way through I was starting to feel like someone had slipped something into my drink as I had no clue what was going on or where I was. The 3.3 rating it has is ridiculous, it's more like 1.3 and that's only because it gives you a reason to join IMDb and write a review.

I had heard that this was awful, but nothing could prepare me for what I was about to view. I thought at least it could be "So bad it's good" but alas, no, it's "So bad it's bad" It just seems that part-way through the production they either gave up or didn't know where to take it. The story was peppered with plot holes and an abundance of terrible acting apart from performances from Tom Goodman-Hill, Martin Compston and Craig Conway.

I'm not going to ramble on about this film as I think I've wasted too much time on it already.

Avoid at all costs!!!

Found the film reasonably entertaining, DD didn't do a bad job, in all fairness. No classic, but certainly watchable.