Abigail

Granted, I had never heard about this 2023 horror movie titled "Abigail" prior to sitting down to watch it here in 2025. So I didn't really know what I was in for. But the fact that it was a horror movie was sufficient for me to sit down and check it out, as I do love all things horror.

I have to say that I found the narrative to be rather slow paced, mundane and generally not a particularly entertaining one. So writer Gunnar Garrett didn't exactly impress me with his script for this movie.

The acting performances in the movie were good. I was not familiar with a single actor or actress on the cast list, but they had a good cast ensemble in the movie.

"Abigail" is not a movie that makes use of any noteworthy special effects.

If you enjoy horror movies, then this is hardly a movie that I would recommend you to waste 88 minutes on watching. Nor is "Abigail" a movie that I will ever return to watch a second time, as it was a struggle sitting through it the first time around.

The best thing about the movie was actually the cover.

My rating of director Melissa Vitello's 2023 movie "Abigail" lands on a three out of ten stars. And how "Abigail" managed to snag a 5.3 rating here on IMDb, in this very moment as I am reviewing it, is simply beyond my comprehension.

Another "genius" craft of a female director, and of course, such directors have male characters or scoundrels, or psychopaths, or traumatized boys, and female characters are all strong and independent. I want to ask you, those who shoot such feminist and incompetent nonsense: "Who taught you this?" Unoriginal, irrelevant, assembled from templates and cliches: he went a kilometer away in need and left a girl; a difficult teenager from a dysfunctional family is insulted by peers and his mother, and it all looks so shabby, and this is only in the first 15 minutes. The amateur production, the boring camerawork, the disgusting light that shines everywhere, all this is just repulsive with its unprofessiveness. I don't want to blame the actors, they play normally, but here's the directorial task that the actors perform - I haven't seen such a primitive for a long time. Who are all these people who are praising this movie? Did they even watch this movie? Or do they stamp their reviews without looking? Why are you doing this, do you really not care, or do you take the viewer for an imbecile? Or are you engaged in infoshamanism, instilling false meanings, for entertainment?

I couldn't stand this absurdity, I didn't watch this mediocre movie trash.

Kenny's Movie Review

"Abigail" (2023)

Available tomorrow On Demand

I'd like to thank Dark Star pictures for providing me a screener link for review

In 1976 a troubled teen befriends her bullied neighbor, seeking revenge on his tormentors, but her obsession turns deadly.

This movie is really good and intense, the film stars Ava Cantrell as "Abigail" and Tren Reed-Brown as "Lucas" as 2 troubled teens in Alabama where the local bullies pick on "Lucas" and Abigail befriends him and helps him overcome the bullies.

The relationship between Abigail and her Mom played by Hermione Lynch is a strange dynamic that really is odd and strange, but the real story here Ava Cantrell as "Abigail" she gives a amazing performance a real breakthrough performance

I really enjoyed this film and the performances were truly incredible

4 Whoppers out of 5 Whoppers 🍔🍔🍔🍔

Highly recommend this movie

Like to thank Dark Star Pictures for providing me the screener for review.

A mother & daughter from California move to a semi-rural area near Huntsville, Alabama, where the teen girl (Ava Cantrell) befriends a black misfit (Tren Reed-Brown). Havoc ensues.

"Abigail" (2023) is part coming-of-age drama and part thriller/slasher. It explores the same interesting themes as Nicolas Cage's "The Old Way" from eleven months prior, although that's a Western. It's comparable to "White Rabbit" (2013) and "The Rage: Carrie 2," just not as entertaining or rewarding. I'd say it's almost on par with "Devil's Island" from two years earlier; however, if you hated that one, you'll hate this even more.

The bottom line is that it's a technically well-made indie and worth checking out for those interested. Petite Ava Cantrell is a highlight and I respect a production that has the confidence to take its time (which others might interpret as boring).

Is what the girl does in the story unbelievable, as some complain? Not if you know the tree from which the fruit fell and she trains in her personal time (even if it's not shown). Filmmakers aren't obligated to spell everything out; they respect the viewer to put the pieces together.

It runs 1 hour, 28 minutes, and was shot in Oakdale, California, which is 31 miles southeast of Stockton in the middle of the Central Valley (more specifically, the northeast part of San Joaquin Valley).

GRADE: B-

Not the amazing breakout these other reviewers claim. Makes me wonder which Abigail movie they were watching. A dull waste of time. Serious lack of character development and misses the mark again and again. It seems like they had a a good set up but lost it in the weak dialogue and the cliche of an adult acting like a teen.

Cantrell has a few moments but overall not believable as the disturbed teen. Brown gives a decent performance but feels as if the director left it all up to him. The sets are a weak attempt at period but at least they did get the wardrobe right.

Key to a good horror is making the crazy believable for even just a moment. Unfortunately this film lost us on the opening drive with flat dialogue and no energy. I don't want to spoil the totally predictable ending but the Father element is just silly. Please don't attempt a sequel.