ÉVALUATION IMDb
4,1/10
1,7 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueTwo estranged "good" vampire sisters work together to rescue their long-lost sister from a group of "bad" vampires who turned them, and killed their parents.Two estranged "good" vampire sisters work together to rescue their long-lost sister from a group of "bad" vampires who turned them, and killed their parents.Two estranged "good" vampire sisters work together to rescue their long-lost sister from a group of "bad" vampires who turned them, and killed their parents.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
Avis en vedette
The acting isn't the best and it's cheaply made but it is what it is, overall it's moderately entertaining and passes the time, can't ask for much more really from a low budget film.
Start with a new mythos for vampires without any explanation of this. Highlight the "sexy" female vampire trope. Add in poorly choreographed and executed "wu shu (?)" Martial arts. Somehow take lame daddy joke style but twist it into girl power ideas. Add all the obvious plot twists that have been beaten to death in just about every vampire movie. Then end with the idea that more is to come (Please No!).
I gave this movie a three as the likeability if the three sisters was decent enough that I actually watched the entire film. But otherwise there isn't much joy in watching the film. It just sits heavy with its lameness.
I gave this movie a three as the likeability if the three sisters was decent enough that I actually watched the entire film. But otherwise there isn't much joy in watching the film. It just sits heavy with its lameness.
Nothing I hate worse then blood drenched bodies after a feeding. The human body doesn't have that much blood in it. So, if there is tons of blood everywhere and on everyone, very little of it was consumed by the vampire. Any vampire that can't drink more blood than they waste doesn't deserve to 'live.' I have a list of movies I will never watch again because the vampires waste more blood than they consume.
I gave this a 5 because it was entertaining, even though it was pretty bad. I won't recommend anyone who is as picky as I am, about vampires who are too stupid to drink blood without making a mess, watch this movie. Unless you're bored and need something to do. Or you're a writer needing to use it as fodder for what not to do. Maybe figure out how to make it better.
I gave this a 5 because it was entertaining, even though it was pretty bad. I won't recommend anyone who is as picky as I am, about vampires who are too stupid to drink blood without making a mess, watch this movie. Unless you're bored and need something to do. Or you're a writer needing to use it as fodder for what not to do. Maybe figure out how to make it better.
This movie had one of most generic dialogues and story line as bland as a single slice of bread and water. You will find yourself wondering how is it even possible to make something so lame for most part of the movie.
That being said it is so terrible that at times actually becomes entertaining and if vampire movies are your thing you still might enjoy it in it's own grotesque way much like music made with broken and out of tune instruments or art made out of garbage.
But myself I can't in good conscience rate it more than 1/10 as this is the most one dimensional and badly written film I know.
That being said it is so terrible that at times actually becomes entertaining and if vampire movies are your thing you still might enjoy it in it's own grotesque way much like music made with broken and out of tune instruments or art made out of garbage.
But myself I can't in good conscience rate it more than 1/10 as this is the most one dimensional and badly written film I know.
Some things in life just don't mix. And two of those things are horror and comedy. This tries, and fails on both levels.
The wooden stakes are actually less wooden than the acting. Apart from the fish who out acted everyone in the cast. Some people say that the original Buffy the Vampire Slayer film was bad, but this makes it look positively Shakespearean!
I'm desperately trying to think of one good thing about this film. But when the best part of watching it was the end credits starting, it's fairly obvious that there's nothing good about it.
Unless you like films with bad acting, a weak script, a complete lack of direction, and losing around 90 minutes of precious life, you should probably avoid this film at all costs!
The most frightening thing about this film is that films this bad tend to become franchises. And we all know what that means..... 😱
The wooden stakes are actually less wooden than the acting. Apart from the fish who out acted everyone in the cast. Some people say that the original Buffy the Vampire Slayer film was bad, but this makes it look positively Shakespearean!
I'm desperately trying to think of one good thing about this film. But when the best part of watching it was the end credits starting, it's fairly obvious that there's nothing good about it.
Unless you like films with bad acting, a weak script, a complete lack of direction, and losing around 90 minutes of precious life, you should probably avoid this film at all costs!
The most frightening thing about this film is that films this bad tend to become franchises. And we all know what that means..... 😱
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesWhen Bullseye opens his weapons wall, the Scythe of Buffy the Vampire Slayer (1997) in Season 7 is displayed prominently among the assorted weapons.
- GaffesWhen Bullseye first sees the sisters, he can identify them as vampires by their heat signature, but Marcus is standing with them and Bullseye doesn't identify him as a vampire.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is V for Vengeance?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 69 420 $ US (estimation)
- Durée
- 1h 26m(86 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39:1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant