The Fourth Musketeer
- 2022
- 1h 25m
ÉVALUATION IMDb
3,3/10
1,5 k
MA NOTE
À la demande de son père, le jeune d'Artagnan voyage de la Gascogne rurale à Paris, où il se retrouve mêlé à un complot sournois entre les mousquetaires du roi et les gardes du cardinal de R... Tout lireÀ la demande de son père, le jeune d'Artagnan voyage de la Gascogne rurale à Paris, où il se retrouve mêlé à un complot sournois entre les mousquetaires du roi et les gardes du cardinal de Richelieu.À la demande de son père, le jeune d'Artagnan voyage de la Gascogne rurale à Paris, où il se retrouve mêlé à un complot sournois entre les mousquetaires du roi et les gardes du cardinal de Richelieu.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
Mollie Hindle-Pérez
- Milady
- (as Mollie Hindle)
Avis en vedette
This movie promised so much but ultimately disappoints.
Very poorly choreographed fight scenes. Bad direction. Average acting.
Its a very slow film that doesn't actually go anywhere. It is nowhere near as good as any single episode of the TV show from 2014 to 2016. These were very well written and directed and had top quality fight scenes. Obviously the director of this movie did no research before creating this mess!
What a waste of a budget and my time!
Very poorly choreographed fight scenes. Bad direction. Average acting.
Its a very slow film that doesn't actually go anywhere. It is nowhere near as good as any single episode of the TV show from 2014 to 2016. These were very well written and directed and had top quality fight scenes. Obviously the director of this movie did no research before creating this mess!
What a waste of a budget and my time!
I watched this because the high rating but quickly found it was a stacked deck. They used every trick in the book to make it look bigger, such as using artistic drawings for the cut scenes, but I still think they made the complete movie with just 4 sets. It doesn't matter because the acting matched the sets, small and uninspired. Finally, the script. It was horrible, just horrible. Do not watch this, ever, find an old movie and be happy.
Production companies are constantly racking their brains as to what they can offer the viewer any time soon. In itself, this is not a problem, I think, as a European who sees high quality in American film. And that is in the convincing scenes of really good actors and, of course, the set design, that is, the scenery itself. They are always realistic portrayals.
Unfortunately, this does not always apply to the genre and the storytelling. Themes like the musketeers were transported very well many years ago. A remake like this is basically an insult. Because one believes to bring the spirit of the times into the given modernity. Which can succeed, if it is transposed to sci-fi level, for example. Light sabers and light swords are not an invention of George Lukas, they existed in comics decades before. That's what someone like me would like to see. The four musketeers in the year 2500.
This movie is not worth the production costs.
Unfortunately, this does not always apply to the genre and the storytelling. Themes like the musketeers were transported very well many years ago. A remake like this is basically an insult. Because one believes to bring the spirit of the times into the given modernity. Which can succeed, if it is transposed to sci-fi level, for example. Light sabers and light swords are not an invention of George Lukas, they existed in comics decades before. That's what someone like me would like to see. The four musketeers in the year 2500.
This movie is not worth the production costs.
Acting is not that great. But some does, it is not painful but could have done much more.
The sound is sometimes done nicely, but also wrongly done.
Pity, they pushed so much information in an unnaturally way that it is pity to see. The script is OK but due to acting it is just lowering the quality of the movie.
The camera work is just B rate and the sound also.
The intro is so much rushed, putting so much information in short time.
It is funny how rapid it goes but also how much potential it has in story.
Like the overall story but the sub elements are pity.
The ending is nice but also predictable and a bit disappointment in the result. The nice thing is how it got round up without being forced.
The sound is sometimes done nicely, but also wrongly done.
Pity, they pushed so much information in an unnaturally way that it is pity to see. The script is OK but due to acting it is just lowering the quality of the movie.
The camera work is just B rate and the sound also.
The intro is so much rushed, putting so much information in short time.
It is funny how rapid it goes but also how much potential it has in story.
Like the overall story but the sub elements are pity.
The ending is nice but also predictable and a bit disappointment in the result. The nice thing is how it got round up without being forced.
So slow and boring. Truncated fight scenes and re tells a story we all know without bringing anything new. Really boring. When it ended it felt like I had watched a preview and the real film was about to begin. Don't waste your time watching it, buying it or renting it.
Le saviez-vous
- GaffesWhen D'Artagnan journeys to Paris in 1625, an illustration of Paris is shown that includes the Porte Saint-Denis triumphal arch. The arch shown in the drawing wasn't built until 1672.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Fourth Musketeer?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Durée
- 1h 25m(85 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant