De nombreuses années après la «guerre de soixante minutes», les villes survivent à une Terre maintenant désolée en se déplaçant sur des roues géantes attaquant et dévorant des villes plus pe... Tout lireDe nombreuses années après la «guerre de soixante minutes», les villes survivent à une Terre maintenant désolée en se déplaçant sur des roues géantes attaquant et dévorant des villes plus petites pour reconstituer leurs ressources.De nombreuses années après la «guerre de soixante minutes», les villes survivent à une Terre maintenant désolée en se déplaçant sur des roues géantes attaquant et dévorant des villes plus petites pour reconstituer leurs ressources.
- Réalisation
- Scénaristes
- Vedettes
- Prix
- 3 victoires et 2 nominations au total
- Nils Lindstrom
- (as Leifur Sigurdarson)
Avis en vedette
Boy is this a mixed bag!
Mortal Engines looks pretty good. The house-machines look awesome, especially the big ones. We are treated to some fine shots. Grandiose stuff. That's cool. The action is alright, nothing too special, but at times it's quite exciting. There is one fight scene though and I gotta say: someone did NOT get the memo that we don't use a million cuts any more. But there isn't that much fighting anyway, so it's not a big problem. The action that's on a bigger scale is much better. The effects look good, except from some greenscreen stuff that will not age well. (remember that one scene in King Kong? Jeeesh)
This movie really is a mixed bag. On one side it's got some creative, original ideas, on the other some overused clishees. For every creative element, there's a cringy line or two.
The characters are okay, can't say I liked anyone to a very big extent..Although Hugo Weaving does have some charisma. What's with that Tom guy? Sorry, but I just didn't like his face. Reminded me of a ventriloquist dummy, or something. Dunno.
Mortal Engines does have a cool atmosphere about it that I liked. But it is a little long, and there is especially one plot element that fell totally flat, although it was supposed to be very moving. It wasn't.
All in all a decent movie, sure to entertain at least some people.
Not bad, but awful if you've read the book.
The nuanced villain has become almost comic book, despite Hugo Weaving's best efforts and the changes to make the Star Wars like ending took the tragedy from the finale. Hester seems hollow and her affection for Tom seems forced. Tom doesn't get to be our unwitting hero, with all his bravery that breaks down Hester removed and the tragic end is turned into an explosive pyrotechnic fest. Even Shrike's story is broken for no good reason, just to make Valentine even more evil and Tom less heroic. What a shame.
So, if you've not read the book, give it a go - there are far worse films - if you have, beware.
Have some potential but boring & predictable.
Zero empathy for characters, wasted talent of Hugo Weaving - the only reason why I want to watch this movie. Although the first scene of the movie looks promising.
Another thing that I hate about this movie, there's some line in this movie like "I don't want to tell you." then they looking at each other, and then "5 years ago..." and I'm like.. w-what.. the hell...
While visually entertaining, missing purpose
The story itself has some flaws, but overall enjoyable film
Cons: -Villain/Antagonist motivation is weak and also its backstory -Supporting characters are flat -Unnecessary sub plots
Score: -2.5/5 Chili Peppers
Verdict:
- The story itself has some flaws, it has a weak world building. It's antagonist has weak qualities of a good villain where you could hate him in the entire film. The movie also suffers from the lack of good backstory for the supporting characters and some of its protagonist motivation. Some subplots are not needed in the film , it just make the film longer and dragging.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe original novel mentioned plastic idols of Walt Disney's Mickey and Pluto, "the animal-headed gods of lost America" in the London History Museum. This film, being made by Universal, instead has plastic idols of Détestable moi (2010)'s Minions.
- GaffesWhen Hester and Tom are rescued by the old couple in the centipede-like craft, they share a small room. Hester, while lying on her back, shares her sad life story. A tear rolls down her cheek, but, given the horizontal position she's in, this would be impossible. The tear should roll pass the side of her face.
- Citations
Shrike: I can remake you, just as I was remade.
Hester Shaw: You're going to kill me?
Shrike: For a little while.
- Générique farfeluThe Universal logo shows the Sixty Minute War occurring across the Earth.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Midnight Screenings: Mortal Engines (2018)
Meilleurs choix
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 100 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 15 951 040 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 7 559 850 $ US
- 16 déc. 2018
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 83 869 818 $ US
- Durée
- 2h 8m(128 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1




